Warm-up Efficiency by Body Warmer Versus Standard Procedure in Severely Traumatized Patients (THERMOTRAUMA)

May 31, 2022 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Evaluation of Warm-up Efficiency by Body Warmer Versus Standard Procedure in Severely Traumatized Patients During Pre-hospital Medical Management

Study of adult patients with severe all-cause trauma having a body temperature less than 36°Celsius (C) that is managed by a Mobile Emergency Service team and oriented towards a Vital Emergency Room.

Currently two devices are used to warm patients during their care at the scene of an accident: a survival blanket and heating in the emergency vehicle. Despite these two devices many patients arrive in hypothermia (body temperature less than 36°C) in emergency departments. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a body warmer associated with standard warming devices on the correction of hypothermia compared to the standard procedure in severely traumatized patients with hypothermia .

It is a national multicentric study with 14 participating Mobile Emergency Service centers and hopefully will include 612 patients.

The study will be carried out according to a pattern of 28 successive periods of one week each during the winter period (October to April), for a total duration of 7 months. 14 action periods ON (warming standard procedure + body warmer) and 14 control periods OFF (warming standard procedure) will be run in random order for each center.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • SAMU 69 - SMUR - Hôpital Edouard Herriot

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major patient with all-cause trauma Grade A or B
  • Patient with a trans-tympanic body temperature of less than 36°Celsius (C) at primary management by terrestrial or heliport Mobile Emergency Service team.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient initially supported by a pre-hospital medical team who does not participate in the study,
  • Patient with cardiopulmonary arrest at initial pre-hospital medical team management,
  • Patient with bilateral otorrhagia (due to the non-feasibility of trans tympanic temperature),
  • Patient with inguinal crease or subclavicular fossa injury,
  • Patient with severe burn (Burnt Body Surface> 20%),
  • Patient deprived of liberty including patients with an electronic bracelet.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ON (standard warming process + body warmer)
Patients included during the ON periods will constitute the experimental group. Warming will be provided by the body warmer in addition to the standard warming procedure (survival blanket and heating in the emergency vehicle).
The body warmer will be wrapped in a waterproof treatment field to avoid the risk of burns, 2 body warmer will be applied on the inguinal crease and 2 on the subclavicular fossa.
Sham Comparator: OFF / Control group (standard warming process )
Patients included during the OFF periods will constitute the control group. Warming will be provided by the standard warming procedure : survival blanket and heating in the emergency vehicle.
Warming only according to the standard procedure : survival blanket and heating in the emergency vehicle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with a temperature > 36°C when the patient arrived in the Vital Emergency
Time Frame: 4 hours
Body temperature will be measured in trans-tympanic when the patient arrived in the Vital Emergency Room.
4 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in body temperature between initial treatment by the Mobile Emergency Service team and arrival at Vital Emergency Room.
Time Frame: 4 hours
Body temperature will be measured in trans-tympanic every 15 minutes between initial treatment by the pre-hospital medical team and arrival at emergency room.
4 hours
Proportion of patients with coagulopathy on arrival at the emergency room.
Time Frame: 4 hours
Coagulopathy refers to disorders of blood coagulation whether they are pathological thrombosis or haemorrhagic syndromes. The coagulopathy criteria appear early and their measurements are systematically carried on admission to the emergency room.
4 hours
Proportion of patients with acidosis on arrival at the emergency room.
Time Frame: 4 hours
Acidosis is a disorder of the acid-base balance of the body corresponding to an increase in the concentration of acid in plasma and interstitial fluids. It can be metabolic or respiratory. In the case of a state of shock, lactic acid occurs in situations where the tissues of the body are poorly irrigated and lack oxygen.
4 hours
Evaluation of mortality
Time Frame: 72 hours
Proportion of deaths at one month (72h after admission to emergency room).
72 hours
Evaluation of mortality (deaths before admission )
Time Frame: 72 hours
Proportion of deaths before admission to emergency room.
72 hours
Evaluation of mortality (cardio respiratory arrest)
Time Frame: 72 hours
Proportion of cardio respiratory arrest before admission to emergency room.
72 hours
Loss of heat due to a drop of temperature
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
First degree burn
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Patient feels cold
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Delphine HUGENSCHMITT, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 69HCL19_0033
  • 2019-A01163-54 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypothermia

Clinical Trials on Body warmer

3
Subscribe