RElevance of UltraSonography for Assessing Salivary Gland Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) (REUSSI-SSc)

April 4, 2022 updated by: Rennes University Hospital
As fibrosis of salivary glands is supposed to be the main mechanism involved in Systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated sicca syndrome, Ultrasonography , biopsy and measuring gland elasticity (by ARFI (Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse)) in SSc patients could also constitute a relevant method to assess the potential alterations of echostructure of major salivary glands and the fibrosis of Salivary Glands in this disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune chronic disorder characterised by vascular hyper-reactivity and fibrosis of the skin as well as internal organs. Intimal hyperplasia, endothelial dysfunction and occlusive vasculopathy are the underlying basis of these chronic vascular damages. The expression of the vasculopathy especially includes Raynaud phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DUs), gastro-intestinal involvement and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Sicca syndrome is clinically characterised by dryness of the eyes (xerophthalmia) and mouth (xerostomia). The prevalence of sicca symptoms is up to 70% in prospective series of SSc patients. Sicca syndrome is supposed to be primarily related to glandular fibrosis. The prevalence of primary Sjögren Syndrome (pSS) among SSc patients, as defined by the American-European Consensus Group criteria is around 15%. Sicca syndrome is therefore a frequent feature in SSc and constitutes an important cause of quality of life's impairment in SSc If studies have already evaluated clinical and histological alterations of minor salivary glands secondary to sicca syndrome in SSc , only few studies used the recent ACR(American College of Rheumatology) 2013 classification criteria for SSc to select patients. SGUS(Salivary Gland UltraSonography) evaluation in SSc has never been assessed to date. Potential alterations of MSG (Major Salivary Gland) echostructure in SSc have never been described to date. The performances and reliability of SGUS to assessed MSG involvement in SSc are still to be determined. As fibrosis of salivary glands is supposed to be the main mechanism involved in SSc-associated sicca syndrome, measuring salivary-gland elasticity using ARFI-ultrasonography in SSc patients could also constitute a relevant method to assess the fibrosis of MSG in this disease. A cross-sectional pilot study is therefore needed to explore these relevant questions about sicca syndrome in SSc.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brest, France, 29000
        • CHU Brest Service de Rhumatologie
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • Chu Rennes
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • CHU Tours, Service de médecine interne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over eighteen years old;
  • Fulfilling 2013 ACR classification criteria for Systemic sclerosis (Van den Hoogen et al. 2013);
  • 60 patients with subjective sicca symptoms reported by a standardised questionnaire (Vitali C et al. 2002);
  • 15 patients without sicca symptoms;
  • Who has signed an informed consent
  • Benefiting from a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment: current (or in the past 6 months) immunosuppressive treatment by rituximab or cyclophosphamide (representing less than 5% of SSc patients in the investigator's centres);
  • Current (or in the past 6 months) treatment with drugs with anti-cholinergic properties (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and anti-histaminic inhibitors (hydroxyzine));
  • Current treatment with antiplatelet aggregates
  • Anti-vitamin K treatment (increasing risk of bleeding during minor salivary gland biopsy); and oral anti-coagulant
  • Known abnormal coagulation (prolonged aPPT(activated partial thromboplastin time) and / or PT (Prothrombin time ( <70%)), or known thrombocytopenia (<150,000 platelets / mm3)
  • Known secondary sicca symptoms : history of head-and-neck radiotherapy, hepatitis C infection, AIDS, sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, graft-vs-host disease and IgG4(Isotype's immunoGlobulin G4)-related disease;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding mothers;
  • Known intolerance/allergy to xylocain injection;
  • Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship, or supervision), inability to consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients reporting subjective sicca symptoms
HAQ(Health Assessment Questionnaire) Score, bilateral schirmer 's test, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, blood sample for immunologic evaluation
Minor salivary gland biopsy with injection of lidocain
Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse on Major Salivary Glands
Ultrasonography of Major Salivary Glands
Experimental: Patients without subjective sicca symptoms
HAQ(Health Assessment Questionnaire) score, bilateral schirmer 's test, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, blood sample for immunologic evaluation
Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse on Major Salivary Glands
Ultrasonography of Major Salivary Glands

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands
Time Frame: up to six months (at evaluation visit)

Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands based on Salaffi's composite score.

each MSG will be scored as followed:

  • grade 0 = normal homogeneous glands;
  • grade 1 = Homogenous borders, slightly heterogeneous parenchyma,
  • grade 2 = Homogenous borders, multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring < 2 mm,
  • grade 3 = multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring 2-6 mm or irregular borders or invisible posterior part of the gland;
  • grade 4 = unstructured glandular parenchyma with multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring >6 mm or calcifications with echogenic bands.

In each patient, 4 grades can be obtained (1 grade per gland);

the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-16) will be the Salaffi's score.

A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 16 the worse

up to six months (at evaluation visit)
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands
Time Frame: up to six months (at evaluation visit)
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands based on bilateral ARFI(Acoustic radiation force Impulse) elastometry
up to six months (at evaluation visit)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Variants of the Salaffi score
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)

Scores of Hocevar,based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.

Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 12 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-48) will be the Hocevar's score. A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 48 the worse.

up to six months (evaluation visit)
Variants of the Salaffi score
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)

Scores of Milic,based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.

Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 3 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-12) will be the Milic's score. A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 12 the worse.

up to six months (evaluation visit)
Variants of the Salaffi score
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)

Scores Jousse-Joulin / Cornec constituting , based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.

Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 4 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-16) will be the Jousse-Joulin/Cornec's score.

A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 16 the worse.

up to six months (evaluation visit)
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)

Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with standardized histological characterization of the Chisholm score.

Chisholm'score will evaluate the number of lymphocytic foci/4mm2 grade 1 : none or slight, grade 2 : less than 50 lymphocytes and histocytes, grade 3 : one focus with at least 50 lymphocytes, grade 4 : More than one focus with at least 50 lymphocytes,

Grade 1 has the best outcome, grade 4 the worse.

up to six months (evaluation visit)
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)

Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with standardized characterization of the focus score.

Focus score : the number of mononuclear cell infiltrates containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,

Focus score 0 = no mononuclear cell infiltrate containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,

Focus score =1 or >1 : one or more mononuclear cell infiltrates containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,

Focus score 0 has the best outcome Focus score =1 or >1 has the worse outcome

up to six months (evaluation visit)
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)
Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with evaluation of fibrosis assessed from F1 to F4
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren according to salivary flow test
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren according to Schirmer test.
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)
forms of the disease
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)
duration of evolution of the disease
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)
visceral damage : Presence or absence of pulmonary involvement on CT scan, Presence or absence of pulmonary arterial hypertension on echocardiography.
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
Time Frame: up to six months (evaluation visit)

immunological data : Positivity of : Anti SSA(Anti Sjögren Syndrom A) antibodies,Anti SSb(Anti Sjögren syndrom B) antibodies,Anti Topoisomerase antibodies, Anti Centromere antibodies, Anti RNA polymerase III antibodies

Using Indirect ImmunoFluorescence (IFI) ( as binary parameter (positive or negative)

up to six months (evaluation visit)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick JEGO, MD, University Hospital of Rennes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 35RC18_9905

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Minor Salivary gland Biopsy

3
Subscribe