Role of IVUS in Management of Iliocaval Obstruction

May 8, 2020 updated by: Sahar Hamdi Ali Abdel-kader, Assiut University

Role of Intravascular Ultrasound(IVUS) in Management of Acute and Chronic Iliocaval Obstruction

To assess the role of IVUS in

  1. Providing diagnostic important data as: luminal diameters, cross-sectional area, assessment of potential thrombus volume which enables optimal choice of appropriate angioplasty technique, endovascular device guidance, and their impact on procedural technical success and patency rates.
  2. comparing diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with multiplanar venography and CT venography for iliocaval obstruction.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Acute and chronic venous disorders of the lower extremities affect millions of people and cause substantial disability. Surgeons and pathologists identified the presence of 'spur-like' abnormalities of the left common iliac vein, these abnormalities were hypothesized to result from compression and/or irritation from the adjacent crossing right common iliac artery. In the 1990s, physicians, starting to perform catheter-directed thrombolysis to treat extensive deep vein thrombosis (DVT), observed that about 50% of patients had an iliac vein stenosis.Treatment is aimed at ameliorating the symptoms and, whenever possible, at correcting the underlying abnormality. Graduated compression is the cornerstone of modern therapy. Deep system disease is often refractory to treatment, but superficial system disease can usually be treated by ablating the refluxing vessels. Effective venous return from the lower extremities requires the interaction of the heart, a pressure gradient, the peripheral muscle pumps of the leg, and competent venous valves. In the absence of pathology, this system functions to reduce venous pressure from approximately 100 mm Hg to a mean of 22 mm Hg within a few steps.

Nonthrombotic venous compression patients with left common iliac vein compression can present in the 2nd or 3rd decade of life and are more common in women. Patients can have limb pain, limb swelling, ipsilateral chronic venous insufficiency, lipodermatosclerosis, recurrent superficial venous thrombophlebitis, and venous claudication.

Thrombotic iliofemoral venous compression with a predisposing anatomic configuration with a prothrombotic physiological state can present with acute pain and swelling of the left lower extremity consistent with an acute iliofemoral DVT mostly phlegmasia cerulea dolens . In the acute phase, patients with a patent foramen ovale can also present with a pulmonary embolism, cryptogenic stroke, with or without pulmonary embolism, or systemic arterial embolism.

The abnormalities in venous physiology associated with chronic venous disease, and their quantification by diagnostic tests, are also considerably more complex than for PAD. With CVD one must gauge the effects of obstruction and/or reflux in a vascular bed uniquely designed to return venous blood to the heart against gravity with the aid of a peripheral muscle pump and in phase with respiratory mechanics.

Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is initial diagnostic test. The criteria include: poststenotic turbulence, as indicated by a mosaic velocity profile, abnormal Doppler signal at the area of stenosis, continuous flow with the Valsalva maneuver, and sluggish with no spontaneous flow and poor augmentation and no respiratory phasicity. But there is limitations as obesity ,casts, dressings, open wounds, Patients with severe edema/swelling and limited patient mobility.

Cross-sectional imaging includes computed tomographic venography (CTV) with venous phase contrast or magnetic resonance venography (MRV).

Catheter-based phlebography traditionally is considered to be the most definitive technique for the evaluation of venous obstruction, supplemented with direct pressure measurements across an area of perceived stenosis in order to determine whether a pressure gradient exists.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) uses a catheter-based ultrasound probe that enables high-resolution evaluation of the vein wall and internal venous architecture in 360. IVUS is more sensitive than phlebography for the detection and characterization of iliac vein pathology. This would be expected since IVUS gives a 360 image versus a single plane image shown by standard phlebograms. Intravascular ultrasound also identifies intraluminal trabeculations, septations, webs, and wall thickening, which can be minimized or missed on standard phlebography, plus reduced radiation exposure in contrast to other modalities.

IVUS is better in evaluating lesion morphology, accurate assessment of luminal dimensions, transmural lesion characteristics. Delineation by IVUS of the spatial distribution of the lesion in a concentric or eccentric pattern and the presence of a soft (fibrous) or hard (calcified) plaque may influence the choice of endovascular therapy as well as predict the risk of immediate or late complications (ie, perforation, thrombosis, restenosis). Evaluation of lesion volume before and after the procedure by IVUS provides a quantitative method to estimate the amount of lesion debulking or displacement and a reference point from which to assess the lesion recurrence/restenosis. IVUS also fulfills many of the necessary requirements of a guidance system for endovascular procedures, namely precise delivery and positioning of stents within target lesions. IVUS is particularly helpful in assessing the relationship of the ostia of branch vessels to the lesion that can be used as landmarks during procedures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71511
        • Recruiting
        • Assiut University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

subjects with with acute or chronic iliocaval obstruction CEAP classification 3-6.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1-acute iliocaval obstruction 2-chronic iliocaval obstruction with CEAP clinical class 3-6 3- acute on top of chronic iliocaval obstruction with CEAP clinical class 3-6 4-symptomatic acute femoro-iliocaval occlusion who underwent successful thrombolysis

Exclusion Criteria:

1 - concomitant peripheral arterial disease in the affected limb. 2-life expectancy less than 5 years. 3- pregnancy 4- malignancy 5-raised renal chemistry 6-pelvic fibrosis 7- contraindication to anti-coagulation therapy. 8-congenital venous malformations 9-Not providing informed consent 10-Any concurrent disease as heart failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage diameter change in iliocaval segment
Time Frame: baseline
Compare the percentage diameter reduction measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and venography and interventional venogram
baseline
Percentage area change in iliocaval segment
Time Frame: baseline
Compare the percentage area reduction measured by IVUS and the calculated percentage area reduction measured by venography and interventional venogram
baseline
technical success of the preformed procedure of endovascular intervention
Time Frame: baseline
patency of the treated vessel segment with\20 % residual stenosis and without dissection or extravasation.
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Patency of the performed procedure
Time Frame: baseline
uninterrupted vessel patency with no procedure performed on the treated segment.
baseline
Secondary Patency of the performed procedure
Time Frame: baseline
whenever maintenance of patency required secondary intervention at the target lesion.
baseline
Assisted Primary Patency of the performed procedure
Time Frame: baseline
cases in which a revision of the revascularization method is applied before vessel occlusion occurs as prophylactic interventions.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: moustafa saad khalil, professor, Assiut University
  • Study Chair: hesham aboelyoun, lecturer, Assiut University
  • Study Chair: ahmed hassan bakr, A.professor, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Iliocaval Compression Syndrome

Clinical Trials on intravascular ultrasound

Subscribe