NOVOsyn® for Trocar Incision After Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy (NOVOTILAC)

September 26, 2023 updated by: Aesculap AG

Randomized, Multi-center, Double Blinded, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Incidence of Complications in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Appendectomy Using Novosyn® CHD Versus Novosyn® Suture Material to Close Trocar Wound

The aim of this study is to evaluate if the application of a Chlorhexidine coated suture (Novosyn® CHD) will reduce the colonization of bacteria in comparison to an uncoated suture (Novosyn®) used for the closure of trocar wounds in laparoscopic surgery (appendectomy and cholecystectomy).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The bacteriostatic and bactericidal effect of Novosyn® CHD will be assessed by the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in each suture group until 30 days postoperatively. The frequency of infections (SSI: A1 and A2) is considered as a suitable parameter for the assessment of efficacy. It is expected that the use of the Novosyn® CHD suture will reduce the occurrence of infections (SSI: A1 and A2) 30 days postoperatively compared to Novosyn suture (primary objective). SSI will be classified according to the Centre of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), therefore the time point for assessment of SSI as set to 30 days postoperatively.

Furthermore, short-term and long-term complications, the handling of the suture material, length of postoperative hospital stay, costs, pain, quality of life, time to return to work, hernia rate including umbilical hernias and the cosmetic outcome will also be assessed as secondary objectives.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

316

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Leonberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 71229
        • Klinikverbund Südwest Krankenhaus Leonberg Alllgemeinchirurgie
      • Schwäbisch Hall, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 74523
        • Diakonie Klinikum gGmbH Schwäbisch Hall
      • Badalona, Spain, 08916
        • Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol General and Digestive Surgery
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08006
        • General Surgery Department Hospital Plató

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

A population undergoing a primary emergency or early elective (24h - 7 days) laparoscopic appendectomy or a primary emergency or early elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy using either Novosyn® CHD or Novosyn® suture for fascia and skin closure of trocar wounds.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing a primary emergency or early elective (24h - 7 days) laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy.
  • Written informed consent
  • Age≥ 18 years
  • Not incapacitated patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open surgery for appendectomy or cholecystectomy
  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine
  • Intraoperatively conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery
  • Patients taking medical consumption that might affect wound healing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Novosyn® CHD
A population undergoing a primary emergency or early elective (24h - 7 days) laparoscopic appendectomy or a primary emergency or early elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy using Novosyn® CHD suture for fascia and skin closure of trocar wounds.
Experimental
Novosyn®
A population undergoing a primary emergency or early elective (24h - 7 days) laparoscopic appendectomy or a primary emergency or early elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy using either Novosyn® suture for fascia and skin closure of trocar wounds.
Comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical Site Infection
Time Frame: until 30 days + 10 days after surgery
Incidence of postoperative surgical site infections, SSI (A1: Superficial incisional site infections and A2: Deep incisional surgical site infections) (efficacy parameter) Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is defined according to the definition of the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
until 30 days + 10 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of Wound Dehiscence
Time Frame: until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Incidence of wound dehiscence (skin) at different postoperative examinations
until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Reoperation Rate
Time Frame: until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Incidence of reoperation rate at different postoperative times
until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Mortality Rate
Time Frame: until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days, and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Incidence of mortality rate at different postoperative times
until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days, and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Postoperative Complications during the postoperative Course
Time Frame: until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days, 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Rates of postoperative complications such as bleeding, tissue reaction, abscess, perforation, bile leaks, biliary peritonitis, ileus, stenosis, fistula at different postoperative points in time
until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days, 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Suture Removal due to Wound Problems during the postoperative Course
Time Frame: until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days, and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Rate of suture removal due to wound problems (infection, dehiscence, residual material requiring removal) at different defined postoperative points in time
until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days, and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: until discharge (ca. 10 days postop)
Defined as the time period from day of operation until day of discharge (efficacy parameter).
until discharge (ca. 10 days postop)
Postoperative Surgical Site Infections
Time Frame: 1 year ±2 months post-op
Incidence of postoperative surgical site infections
1 year ±2 months post-op
Rate of Conversion to open surgery
Time Frame: intraoperatively
Number of interventions where operation technique has to be converted to open surgery intraoperatively
intraoperatively
Time to return to work
Time Frame: up to 1 year ±2 months
Defined as the duration (days) from day of surgery until the day when the patient was able to work. Employment status of the patient will also be reported.
up to 1 year ±2 months
Course of Pain: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: preoperatively, at day of discharge (ca. 10 days postop), at 30 days +10 days and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
This parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal pain". The values are compared over postoperative period.
preoperatively, at day of discharge (ca. 10 days postop), at 30 days +10 days and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Course of Cosmetic result
Time Frame: 30 days +10 days, 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Overall patient and observer satisfaction with the scar using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Cosmetic result and the scar will be evaluated by the patient and the physician. Patient will rate the cosmetic outcome in six categories (Pain, Itching, Color of scar, Stiffness of scar, thickness and irregularity of scar) on a 1 to 10 points scale each. The physician will use the Observer component, rating vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief and pliability of the scar on a 1 to 10 points scale each. The categories are added to a total POSAS score of 11 (minimum) to 110 points (maximum)
30 days +10 days, 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Course of Overall patient and observer satisfaction with the scar: Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Time Frame: 30 days +10 day, 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Overall patient and observer satisfaction with the scar using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Cosmetic result and the scar will be evaluated by the patient and the physician. Patient will rate the cosmetic outcome in six categories (Pain, Itching, Color of scar, Stiffness of scar, thickness and irregularity of scar) on a 1 to 10 points scale each. The physician will use the Observer component, rating vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief and pliability of the scar on a 1 to 10 points scale each. The categories are added to a total POSAS score of 11 (minimum) to 110 points (maximum)
30 days +10 day, 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Comparison of wound appearance
Time Frame: discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Photographic documentation of the wounds for assessment
discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days and 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Comparison of handling parameters of the suture materials
Time Frame: intraoperatively
Comparison of the handling features of the suture materials in eight different categories (ease of passage of the suture, first throw knot holding, knot tie down smoothness, knot security, surgical hand, memory effect, lack of frying and the overall handling) by rating each category on a 5 point scale (excellent, very good, good, satisfied, poor); no overall score is calculated, the categories are compared separately
intraoperatively
Course of Health Status
Time Frame: 30 days +10 days after surgery, 1 year ±2 months after surgery
EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health status developed by EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. EQ-5D is designed for self-completion by respondents and it takes only a few minutes to complete. Instructions to respondents are included in the questionnaire. EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - descriptive system and the EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondents self rated health on a 20 cm vertical , visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled "the best health you can imagine" and " the worst health you can imagine"
30 days +10 days after surgery, 1 year ±2 months after surgery
Hernia Rate / Umbilical Hernia Rate
Time Frame: until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days, 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Hernia rate including umbilical hernia postoperatively verified by ultra-sound examination compared at different postoperative points in time
until discharge (ca. 10 days postop), 30 days +10 days, 1 year ±2 months postoperatively
Costs (economics)
Time Frame: 1 year ±2 months
Assessment of costs will be calculated on postoperative complication (SSI) in both suture groups (efficient parameter).
1 year ±2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Markus Golling, Prof. Dr., Diakonie Klinikum gGmbH Schwäbisch Hall

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 24, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on Novosyn® CHD for fascia and skin closure

3
Subscribe