Urodynamic Assessment of the Lower Urinary Tract: Water vs. Air

February 11, 2022 updated by: University of Zurich

Assessment of the Lower Urinary Tract: Consistency, Features and Artifacts of Invasive Urodynamic Assessments - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of water-perfused (WP) and air-charged (AC) catheters for invasive urodynamic investigation (UDI) regarding consistency, features and artifacts.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

UDI is the gold standard to assess refractory lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), i.e. to detect and specify lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). Therefore, UDI findings lead to diagnosis and decision-making for further non-invasive and invasive therapies. For UDI pressure recordings, the use of WP catheters is recommended by the International Continence Society (ICS).

Currently AC catheters have been marked for pressure recording as an alternative to WP catheters. However, the number of comparative studies is very limited. Nevertheless, since release, AC catheters have gained popularity due to their omnidirectional detection of pressure, and claimed reduction in movement artefacts (due to weight-less air column vs weighted water column), lack of external reference level, and ease of set-up/use. Still, there is debate whether AC catheters are an acceptable alternative to fluid-filled lines for measuring intravesical and intra-abdominal pressure in UDI. Based on the available literature, an appropriate conclusion, whether both systems can be used as equivalents and interchangeably, cannot be drawn.

In this study we compare both systems regarding consistency, features and artifacts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

490

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zürich, Switzerland
        • Universitätsklinik Balgrist

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients with LUTD
  • Age: minimum 18 years
  • Informed consent
  • Competent German language skills

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding (see chapter 3.6.)
  • Symptomatic UTI
  • Individuals especially in need of protection
  • No informed consent
  • Patients incapable to follow the trial, e.g. because of language problems, psychiatric disorders, dementia and so on.
  • Earlier participation in this clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Air-charged measurement system
UDI (same session repeat filling cystometry and pressure flow study) according to "Good Urodynamic Practice" recommended by the ICS but using an air-charged instead of a water-filled measurement system.
Urodynamic investigation using an air-charged measurement system
Urodynamic investigation using a water-perfused measurement system
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Water-perfused measurement system
UDI (same session repeat filling cystometry and pressure flow study) according to "Good Urodynamic Practice" recommended by the ICS.
Urodynamic investigation using an air-charged measurement system
Urodynamic investigation using a water-perfused measurement system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Artefact susceptibility of the measurement systems
Time Frame: During the urodynamic investigation
Number of Artifacts impairing the quality/interpretability of the urodynamic examination
During the urodynamic investigation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective perception of pain and discomfort (on a visual analog scale) between the measurement systems
Time Frame: During the urodynamic investigation
Perception of pain and discomfort on a visual analog scale (presented as a 100-mm horizontal line on which the patient's pain and discomfort intensity is represented by a point between the extremes of "no pain/discomfort at all" and "worst pain/discomfort imaginable (from 0 to 10))
During the urodynamic investigation
Incidence of side effects: number and intensity/severity (mild/moderate/severe) of AEs and SAE for the following categories during and for 7 days after the urodynamic investigation using an air-charged vs. water-perfused measurement system
Time Frame: Once during urodynamic investigation and 7 days thereafter
Infection - Urinary Tract Infection (UTI); severe or sudden increase in pain; severe or sudden increase in spasticity; autonomic dysreflexia; urgent (unexpected) transfer/admittance to an acute care facility
Once during urodynamic investigation and 7 days thereafter
Difference in volumetric during urodynamic investigation using an air-charged vs. water-perfused measurement system
Time Frame: During the urodynamic investigation
Cystometric capacity [mL], volume at first DO [mL], voided volume [mL] and post void residual [mL] as assessed by urodynamic measurement
During the urodynamic investigation
Difference in Compliance [mL/cmH2O] during urodynamic investigation using an air-charged vs. water-perfused measurement system
Time Frame: During the urodynamic investigation
During the urodynamic investigation
Difference in Pressure changes during urodynamic investigation using an air-charged vs. water-perfused measurement system
Time Frame: During the urodynamic investigation
Maximum DO amplitude [cmH2O], detrusor leak-point pressure [cmH2O], maximum detrusor pressure [cmH2O] during storage phase, maximum detrusor pressure [cmH2O] during voiding phase, detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate [cmH2O]
During the urodynamic investigation
Difference in in maximum flow rate [mL/s] during urodynamic investigation using an air-charged vs. water-perfused measurement system
Time Frame: During the urodynamic investigation
During the urodynamic investigation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 11, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Urodynamic investigation

Subscribe