Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Versus Standard Speech Therapy Versus Control in Hypophonia Rehabilitation in MS

July 24, 2019 updated by: Davide Cattaneo, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Versus Standard Speech and Language Therapy Versus Control in Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of the study is to identify the most effective method of intervention to reduce hypophonia in PwMS (Patient With Multiple Sclerosis), as a way to optimize the speech-therapy treatment based on scientific evidence. In the previous AB study, we aimed to verify the efficacy of LSVT LOUD® in PwSM: in the present study we will compare different treatment in a larger sample.

Half of the participants will follow the LSVT Loud program, the other half will follow usual care rehabilitation programs.

The results of these groups will be compared with an historical cohort of no treatment patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The descriptive studies showed that voice problems, in particular hypophonia, are present in 45% to 91% of patients with multiple sclerosis and may constitute a limitation in social life participation. Although voice, speech and communication are significant aspects for the biopsychosocialwell-being and life quality, only 2% of the PwMS had received any speech therapy and, at the same time, few studies assessed the effects of speech treatment for PwMS.

In according to the taxonomy of voice therapy, the conventional treatment may include direct interventions such as vocal function and modification of respiratory function.

The LSVT LOUD® treatment is a standardized, research-based speech treatment protocol with established efficacy for Idiopathic Parkinson Disease (IPD) and is well described in a large number of studies. Subsequently, further studies supported the efficacy of LSVT LOUD® in voice rehabilitation in various neurological diseases, including Multiple Sclerosis. In the study of Sapir et al., only two women were treated with LSVT LOUD® and the authors concluded that intensive phonatory-respiratory treatment can produce clinically significant and long-term improvement in vocal function in PwMS. These findings are consistent with suggestion that intensive training can improve function in those parts of the body that are prone to fatigue and that vocal training probably minimizes disuse atrophy and increases muscle strength and coordination.

The content and dose of the SLT (Speech Language Therapy) of dysphonia in MS is poorly defined within the published literature and we did not find any meta-analyzes or guidelines that suggest instructions for therapists.

The purpose of this project is to identify the most effective method of intervention to reduce hypophonia in PwMS, as a way to optimize the speech-therapy treatment based on scientific evidence. The data in literature suggest that LSVT LOUD® may be functional for these aims, although there isn't broad-based study with PwSM.

Fourty Persons with Multiple Sclerosis will be randomly allocated to an experimental group (Lee Silverman Voice Treatment - LSVT LOUD® method) or to a control group following usual care rehabilitation programs.

Also an historical cohort of untreated patients was considered (voice assessment: baseline, after 4 weeks, FU-Follow Up at 6/12 months).

Data collection in both groups will be performed at baseline, after 4 weeks of treatment and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU). In order to evaluate the perceptual impact of the treatment, GIRBAS and VHI will be proposed.

The acoustic variables will be recorded with the software PRAAT: SPL (Sound Pressure Level) of a sustained /ah/, SPL of functional sentences, maximum phonation time, SPL of 1 minute monologue. In addition, the following values were taken in the minute of spontaneous speech: Jitter, shimmer, fundamental frequency, maximum frequency and minimum frequency. The type of MS, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) , demographic data, disease duration, presence of postural and respiratory problems, presence of depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II - BDI II) , pharmacological treatment and cognitive status (Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests) will be considered.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Fondazione Don Gnocchi Irccs
        • Contact:
          • Davide Cattaneo, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis according with McDonald's criteria;
  • absence of relaps in the last month;
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) > 21 score for a better understanding and adherence to the execution of the proposed exercises;
  • hypophonia (conversation < 60 dB SPL- distance was kept equal at about 15 cm);
  • ability to understand the aims of the study and acceptance to sign an informed consent;
  • acceptance of the intensity of the treatment;
  • ability to understand the Italian language.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other neurological disorders;
  • visual/hearing impairments hindering the rehabilitation program;
  • clinical history of laryngeal cancer, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, head and neck trauma or endotracheal intubation;
  • relapse or sudden changes in their MS symptoms within the previous 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lee Silverman Voice Therapy
LSVT LOUD® is a therapy program which requires four sessions per week for 4 weeks by a speech and language therapists with a certification in Lee Silverman Voice Therapy. Each session lasted 50-60 min.
LSVT LOUD® comprises maximum effort non-speech and speech drills. The non-speech drills include the production of 15 sustained 'ah' phonation at high volume and pitch glides (5 repetitions moving from modal pitch to high pitch and 15 repetitions moving from modal pitch and going down on production of sustained 'ah'). The speech drills utilize a hierarchy of speech tasks moving from single words through phrases and onto conversational speech to generalize
Active Comparator: Conventional Treatment
The content and dose of standard SLT is poorly defined within the published literature. For this reason, the standard therapy intervention will encompass all SLT techniques that are not LSVT®. Treatment will be individualized and may include any of the following: exercises targeting respiration, phonation, articulation, behavioral strategies to reduce prosodic abnormality

speech rehabilitation protocol comprehend:

  • Respiratory and phonatory exercises: exercises to increase diaphragmatic and respiratory functions, exercises to increase expiration time using natural expiration or sibilant, exercise to increase phonation time by pronouncing the vocal /a/, exercise to reduce oral stiffness.
  • Articulation and prosody exercises: repetition or reading lists of possibly long and complex words that start with or contain consonants groups. Read aloud texts, sentences or words, making sure to articulate and pronounce the words well without diminishing or increasing the rhythm of speech, with the correct punctuation and intonation. If necessary, ask patients to hyperarticulate, accelerate or slow down, or exaggerate intonation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in intensity (dB) of 3 sustained /ah/
Time Frame: at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
All subjects were requested to sustain the vowel /ah/ as long as possible at a comfortable frequency and maximum intensity level. Specific task was given: "Please and say /ah/. Make it strong and steady, and sustain it for as long as you can".
at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
Change in intensity measured in decibel (dB) of three functional sentences
Time Frame: at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
all speakers were requested to produce three functional sentences at a comfortable frequency and maximum intensity level. The sentences were the same for all subjects. Specific tasks, identical for each individual, was given: "Please take a deep breath and repeat each sentences with effort voice".
at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
Change in intensity in conversation measured in decibel (dB)
Time Frame: at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
A speech sample of approximately one minute of spontaneous conversation was recorded and measured in dB in order to analyze speech intensity. Specific tasks, identical for each individual, was given: "Please speak for at least a minute".
at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Maximum Phonation Time (MPT) of three sustained /ah/ (sec.)
Time Frame: at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
All subjects were requested to sustain the vowel /ah/ as long as possible at a comfortable frequency and maximum intensity level. Specific tasks, identical for each individual, was given: "Please and say /ah/. Make it strong and steady, and sustain it for as long as you can".
at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
Change in Vocal Handicap Index
Time Frame: at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is a self-assessed standardized 30-point questionnaire, which includes items on the impact of the voice disorder on daily life. The questionnaire is divided into three subscales covering functional, emotional and physical aspect of voice disorders. Each answer is graded 0 to 4 depending on the frequency of the difficulty: 0 no difficulties, 1 almost never, 2 sometimes, 3 almost always, 4 always.
at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
Change in GIRBAS
Time Frame: at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)
Tool used to quantify perceptual evaluation of the voice quality. The scale evaluates in particular 5 aspects of voice: Grade, Instability, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain. Voice quality was assessed by a trained speech therapist, using a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 regular, 1 mildly pronounced, 2 moderate, 3 very pronounced.
at baseline, at 4 weeks (after the completion of 16 training sessions) and after 6-12 months up to the end of the rehabilitation program (FU)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Maria Carrozza, PhD, Fondazione Don C. Gnocchi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Lee Silverman Voice Therapy

3
Subscribe