Clinical Trial Readiness Network FSHD France: Prospective 24 Months MRI Study (ReSOLVE_France)

February 8, 2024 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

The overall aim of this study is to hasten drug development for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Recent breakthroughs in FSHD research have identified the primary disease mechanism as the aberrant expression of a normally silenced gene, DUX4, resulting in a toxic gain-of-function. This disease mechanism is particularly amenable to knock-down of DUX4 using epigenetic strategies or RNA therapies, as well as to other interventions targeting the downstream effects of DUX4 expression. There are many drug companies actively working towards disease-targeted therapies, and two clinical trials either under way now, or planned to start in early Fall 2016. However, meetings with industry, advocacy groups, and FSHD researchers have identified several gaps in the clinical trial arsenal, and clinical trial planning as a major goal for the community. Consequently, there is an urgent need to establish the tools necessary for the conduct of currently planned and expected therapeutic trials in FSHD.

To this end, the researchers propose to develop two novel clinical outcome assessments (COA), a composite functional outcome measure (FSH-COM) and skeletal muscle biomarker, electrical impedance myography (EIM). In addition there is broad consensus a better understanding of the relationship of genetic and demographic features to disease progression will be necessary for enumerating eligibility criteria.

The specific aims are to: 1. Determine the multi-site validity of the COAs, 2. Compare the responsiveness of new COAs to other FSHD outcomes and determine the minimal clinically meaningful changes, and 3. establish FSHD cohort characteristics useful for determining clinical trial eligibility criteria. To achieve these aims, the Nice University Hospital is conducting a monocentric, prospective, 18 month study on 30 subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Hauts De France
      • Lille, Hauts De France, France, 59000
        • CHRU de Lille
    • Ile De France
      • Paris, Ile De France, France, 75013
        • Myology institute Association
    • Provence Alpes Cote d'Azur
      • Nice, Provence Alpes Cote d'Azur, France, 06000
        • Chu de Nice

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Genetically confirmed FSHD1 or clinical diagnosis of FSHD with characteristic findings on exam and an affected parent or offspring 63
  • Age 18-75 years
  • Symptomatic limb weakness
  • Patient able to walk alone or with a walking aid.
  • Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) score ≥ 4 for one of the lower limb muscles
  • Patient affiliated to the social security system
  • Patient giving written consent after written and oral information.
  • If taking over the counter supplements willing to remain consistent with supplement regimen throughout the course of the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cardiac or respiratory dysfunction (deemed clinically unstable, or would interfere with safe testing in the opinion of the Investigator)
  • Orthopedic conditions that preclude safe testing of muscle function
  • Regular use of available muscle anabolic/catabolic agents such as corticosteroids, oral testosterone or derivatives, or oral beta agonists
  • Use of an experimental drug in an FSHD clinical trial within the past 30 days
  • Pregnancy.
  • Contraindication for muscle MRI
  • Any major comorbidity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
Monitoring of commonly used and news COA in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validate FSHD-COM in French as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
The FSHD-COM is an 18-item evaluator-administered instrument comprised of individually validated functional motor tasks. The body regions represented match areas of importance identified by patients and include: leg function; shoulder and arm function; trunk function, hand function; and balance. Each item is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 representing unaffected/normal performance, and the divisions based on healthy population normative values, or the relative degree of ability to perform the functional task. The total scale has 72 points, with larger weight given to the two most frequently patient-cited areas of functional motor concern - leg function and shoulder and arm function.
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate optimized Timed Up and Go Test (optimized TUG) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Balance and mobility in patients able to walk at most 30 meters will be assessed using the optimized Timed Up and Go test (TUG). The optimized TUG test measures, in seconds, the time taken by patient to sit up from a lying down position (1st time interval); stand up from the mat (approximate height of 46 cm, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the mat, sit down (2nd time interval); and lie down to return to starting position (3rd time interval).
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the Motor Function Measure-32 (MFM-32) from Baseline to 12, 18 and 24 months
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months

Within MFM-32, 32 terms will be evaluated to describe patient's motor functions and grouped into 3 sub-scores at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months:

D1: standing position and transfer D2: axial and proximal motor function D3: distal motor function The MFM-32 ratings rely on the use of a 4-point Likert scale based on the subject's maximal abilities without assistance (0: cannot initiate the task or maintain the starting position; 1: performs the task partially; 2: performs the task incompletely or imperfectly; 3: performs the task fully and normally.)

at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Severity Scores (CSS) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
A limited physical exam and strength testing will be used to derive a FSHD clinical severity score. The severity score ranks weakness in the face, shoulders, arms, distal, and proximal lower extremities on a 10 point scale.
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Severity Scores (FCS) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
A limited physical exam and strength testing will be used to derive a FSHD clinical severity score. The severity score ranks weakness in the face, shoulders, arms, distal, and proximal lower extremities on a 15 point scale.
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Change of the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) from Baseline to 12, 18 and 24 months
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
The Manual Muscle Testing is a modified Medical Research Council 13-point and is used with standardized positions for each grade and each muscle following the recommendations of the FSH-DY Group. Shoulder abduction and flexion, elbow flexion and extension, wrist flexion and extension, fingers flexion and extension, hip flexion and abd/adduction, knee flexion and extension, ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion strength will be measured bilaterally
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Quantitative Muscle Assessment is performed using a fixed myometry testing system, with a force transducer attached by an inelastic strap to a metal frame.
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate the fall and exercice questionnaire as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
A fall and exercise questionnaire will assess average monthly falls and near falls, and average weekly amount of exercise. A fall assessment will be completed weekly for 3 months after the first visit. Subjects will be asked to respond to a call every week, for 12 consecutive weeks, that asks about any falls they have had over the past week.
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate the work questionnaire as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
The work questionnaire is a standard questionnaire asking about the effect of FSHD on work/occupation.
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-57 (PROMIS57) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 18 and 24 months
The PROMIS57 is an instrument developed by the NIH PROMIS initiative. It generates scores for physical function, and the impact of physical limitations on daily life.
at baseline, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Upper Extremity Functional Index 15 (UEFI15) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 18 and 24 months
The Upper Extremity Functional Index 15 (UEFI15) is a validated patient reported measure for adults with upper extremity dysfunction. This index measures upper extremity dysfunction. 20 questions are combined into a total score, the score is transformed into a normalized score with 80 representing normal, and lower scores representing increasing disability.
at baseline, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Facial Disability Index (FDI) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 18 and 24 months
The Facial Disability Index (FDI) is a short 5 items questionnaire which assesses the physical impact of facial weakness. The five questions are summed into total score which transformed onto a percentage scale, with 100 representing normal, and lower scores representing increasing disability.
at baseline, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
IOPI is a means to quantify lip, tongue, and buccal strength using a validated tool with published ranges for normative data for lingual measurements.
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate Muscle Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 12 and 24 months
Muscle MRI studies will be performed on a 1.5 Tesla equipment at baseline,12 and 24 months
at baseline, 12 and 24 months
Change of the respiratory function (sitting and bedside spirometry) from Baseline to 12, 18 and months
Time Frame: at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Sitting and bedside spirometry allow to obtain forced vital capacity and forced respiratory volume in 1 second, two standardized outcomes commonly used to evaluate respiratory function in clinical follow up and clinical trials.
at baseline, 12, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 18 and 24 months
The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) is a 17 question, self-report inventory, which was developed to measure symptomatic severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia as reported by the affected patient. The questionnaire uses a 100mm long visual analogue scale (VAS) for all but one question.
at baseline, 18 and 24 months
Validate the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) as COA
Time Frame: at baseline, 18 and 24 months
The Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) is a questionnaire which assesses overall breathing discomfort, sensory qualities, and emotional responses in laboratory and clinical settings. The MDP assesses dyspnea during a specific time or a particular activity (focus period) and is designed to examine individual items that are theoretically aligned with separate mechanisms.
at baseline, 18 and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 16, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 16, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscular Dystrophy

Clinical Trials on Validation of new COA for FSHD patients

3
Subscribe