- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04048382
Developing a Patient Navigation Intervention for PrEP Continuum of Care Among Young Latino MSM (PrEParate)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Reducing the number of new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections is one of the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and an objective of Healthy People 2020. Men who have sex with men (MSM) are the most at risk group for contracting HIV in the U.S., comprising 67% of the total new HIV diagnoses in 2014. The HIV epidemic impacts some groups of MSM disproportionately, with Latino MSM comprising 25.1% of new HIV infections among MSM between the ages of 13 and 29 years. Moreover, between 2010 and 2014, incidence of HIV increased 13% among Latino MSM, while all other racial/ethnic MSM groups showed stable or decreasing trends, underscoring the vulnerability of HIV infection among Latino MSM.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a medication taken daily to reduce risk of becoming infected with HIV, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012, and has demonstrated strong efficacy. When taken consistently, PrEP has been shown to reduce new incidence of HIV by 92%. Despite the promise of PrEP to transform HIV prevention, there remain significant barriers to PrEP use among those who would benefit the most, including low awareness, knowledge, medical mistrust, perceived high costs, lack of access, language barriers, low health literacy, and stigma. In a recent study conducted among 600 MSM between the ages of 18 and 29 years in Southern California, Latino MSM reported the lowest levels of use at 6.6%, compared to 9.8% and 13.9% for Black and White participants, respectively. Although Latino MSM reported the lowest use of PrEP, they also reported the greatest willingness to use PrEP compared to White and Black MSM. This discrepancy in willingness versus actual PrEP use among Latino MSM emphasizes the need to intervene to address barriers among this population.
There are a number of different steps that individuals must take to initiate, regularly adhere to, and persist in taking PrEP, with each step in this cascade associated with its own unique barriers. One approach that has been used to address multiple barriers to adhering to recommended health care is patient navigation (PN). PN has been successfully utilized to facilitate access to healthcare among other Latino populations and peer PN may be an ideal intervention to aid in PrEP uptake among Latino MSM by assisting individuals in overcoming barriers to obtaining and using PrEP. To our knowledge, no known PN programs for PrEP have been developed or pilot tested specifically for Latino MSM.
The proposed study will engage young Latino MSM, a population at substantial risk for HIV infection, to pilot-test a peer PN intervention designed to improve engagement and retention in PrEP care. The peer PN intervention will be pilot-tested by comparing it to receipt of usual medical care (UC) plus written information. Individuals randomized to PN will receive the services of a peer patient navigator who will collaborate with the patient, his partner(s), health care professionals, and support service professionals to improve awareness of PrEP, facilitate engagement and retention in PrEP care, and provide strategies for adherence to PrEP. PN will be compared to UC at a 3 and 6-month follow-ups to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the PN intervention, and the preliminary impact of the PN intervention on engagement in PrEP-related care and PrEP adherence. In response to RFA-MH-17-361 "Improving the HIV PrEP Cascade-R34," the investigators propose:
To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of the patient navigation intervention by comparing it to usual care to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact. The investigators plan to randomize 60 young Latino MSM participants to either the PN or UC condition and follow participants for 6 months. It is expected that the pilot test will provide information about the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study methods, in preparation for a future full-scale efficacy trial. In addition, the pilot test will evaluate its preliminary impact on 7 PrEP cascade-related outcomes (i.e., scheduled and attended PrEP consultation; PrEP prescription received; PrEP prescription filled; PrEP initiated; self-reported PrEP adherence; and PrEP follow-up medical appointment attended).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92182
- San Diego State University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 to 29 years
- Identifies as male
- Identifies as gay/bisexual or reports having sex with men in past 12 months
- Identifies as Latino/Hispanic
- Self-reports being HIV-uninfected
- Resides in San Diego County, California
- Speaks English or Spanish
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Willing to receive PrEP-related health care at FHCSD
- Reports at least one HIV risk factor as informed by CDC guidelines
10a. MSM are at elevated risk for HIV (as per CDC) if they report one of the following:
- an HIV-infected sexual partner
- diagnosis of a bacterial STI within the past 12 months
- engaging in condomless anal sex with a non-monogamous partner in the past 12 months
- engaging in commercial sex work in the past 12 months
- injection of illicit drugs and sharing of injection equipment in the past 12 months
- engaging in drug treatment for injection drug use in the past 12 months.
Exclusion criteria:
1. HIV-infected
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Patient Navigation (PN)
This intervention consists of standardized health educational materials and manualized sessions that can be implemented based on a participant's stage in the PrEP continuum.
The intervention will utilize bilingual peer lay navigators and also consist of barrier reduction strategies to assist individuals with implementing HIV prevention, including the use of PrEP.
|
Spanish-English bilingual peer lay navigators hired by Family Health Centers of San Diego will provide the PN intervention during the study, trained using manuals developed in formative research and via the Patient Navigation Research Program training approach.
Services will generally focus on: 1) overcoming community, health system, interpersonal, and individual barriers to accessing PrEP-related healthcare; 2) increasing each patient's knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy for initiating and adhering to PrEP; 3) improving communication between the patient and healthcare team through appointment scheduling and reminders; and 4) sexual risk reduction counseling.
|
|
Other: Usual Care (UC)
Participants in this condition will receive the CDC's 2-page PrEP Information Sheet in the participant's preferred language (either English or Spanish).
|
The booklet given is a 2-page booklet including the following information: 1) overview of PrEP; 2) eligibility for PrEP; 3) efficacy of PrEP; 4) safety of PrEP; and 5) obtaining, initiating, and adhering to PrEP.
Participants will also be provided with both verbal and written information regarding available sexual health and HIV prevention services, including PrEP, at Family Health Centers of San Diego (FHCSD).
Comprehensive HIV-prevention healthcare, including PrEP, is available to study participants at FHCSD at no or minimal cost.
If a UC participant is diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection, including HIV, treatment and follow-up will be coordinated by FHCSD staff as per usual care procedures.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants That Scheduled an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Participants will be asked if they have scheduled an appointment for PrEP consultation on a follow up questionnaire.
It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
|
3 months
|
|
Percent of Participants That Attended an Appointment for PrEP Consultation.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Participants will be asked if they have attended an appointment for PrEP consultation on a follow up questionnaire.
It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
|
3 months
|
|
Percent of Participants That Received a PrEP Prescription.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Participants will be asked if they have received a PrEP prescription on a follow up questionnaire.
It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
|
3 months
|
|
Percent of Participants That Filled Their PrEP Prescription.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Participants will be asked if they have filled their PrEP prescription on a follow up questionnaire.
It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
|
3 months
|
|
Percent of Participants That Initiated PrEP Use.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Participants will be asked to self-report their PrEP initiation on a follow up questionnaire.
|
3 months
|
|
Percent of Participants That Adhered to PrEP Over the Past Seven Days for Participants That Initiated PrEP
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Participants will be asked to self-report their PrEP use over the past seven days on a follow up questionnaire.
|
3 months
|
|
Percent of Participants That Attended PrEP Follow-up Appointment.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Participants will be asked if they have attended a PrEP follow-up appointment on a follow up questionnaire.
It will be confirmed by reviewing their medical records.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aaron J Blashill, PhD, San Diego State University
- Principal Investigator: Kristen Wells, PhD, San Diego State University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, Goicochea P, Casapia M, Guanira-Carranza JV, Ramirez-Cardich ME, Montoya-Herrera O, Fernandez T, Veloso VG, Buchbinder SP, Chariyalertsak S, Schechter M, Bekker LG, Mayer KH, Kallas EG, Amico KR, Mulligan K, Bushman LR, Hance RJ, Ganoza C, Defechereux P, Postle B, Wang F, McConnell JJ, Zheng JH, Lee J, Rooney JF, Jaffe HS, Martinez AI, Burns DN, Glidden DV; iPrEx Study Team. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2587-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
- Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, Buchbinder S, Lama JR, Guanira JV, McMahan V, Bushman LR, Casapia M, Montoya-Herrera O, Veloso VG, Mayer KH, Chariyalertsak S, Schechter M, Bekker LG, Kallas EG, Grant RM; iPrEx Study Team. Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med. 2012 Sep 12;4(151):151ra125. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004006.
- Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
- Smith DK, Van Handel M, Wolitski RJ, Stryker JE, Hall HI, Prejean J, Koenig LJ, Valleroy LA. Vital Signs: Estimated Percentages and Numbers of Adults with Indications for Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Acquisition--United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Nov 27;64(46):1291-5. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6446a4.
- Calhoun EA, Whitley EM, Esparza A, Ness E, Greene A, Garcia R, Valverde PA. A national patient navigator training program. Health Promot Pract. 2010 Mar;11(2):205-15. doi: 10.1177/1524839908323521. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
- Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC, Post D, Wells KJ, McKoy JM, Battaglia T, Simon MA, Kilbourn K; Patient Navigation Research Program Group. Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Psychooncology. 2012 Sep;21(9):986-92. doi: 10.1002/pon.2002. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
- Katz ML, Young GS, Reiter PL, Battaglia TA, Wells KJ, Sanders M, Simon M, Dudley DJ, Patierno SR, Paskett ED. Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care. Womens Health Issues. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):e155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.010.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2014. HIV Surveillance Report. 2015;26:1-123.
- Pulsipher CA MJ, Plant A, Curtis P, Holloway IW, Leibowitz AA. Addressing PrEP Dispartities Among Young Gay and Bisexual Men in California. California HIV/AIDS Research Program, 2016 September. Report No.
- Golub SA, Gamarel KE, Rendina HJ, Surace A, Lelutiu-Weinberger CL. From efficacy to effectiveness: facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013 Apr;27(4):248-54. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0419.
- Bauermeister JA, Meanley S, Pingel E, Soler JH, Harper GW. PrEP awareness and perceived barriers among single young men who have sex with men. Curr HIV Res. 2013 Oct;11(7):520-7. doi: 10.2174/1570162x12666140129100411.
- Ayala G, Makofane K, Santos GM, Beck J, Do TD, Hebert P, Wilson PA, Pyun T, Arreola S. Access to Basic HIV-Related Services and PrEP Acceptability among Men Who Have sex with Men Worldwide: Barriers, Facilitators, and Implications for Combination Prevention. J Sex Transm Dis. 2013;2013:953123. doi: 10.1155/2013/953123. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
- Lui A, Colfax G, Cohen S, Bacon O, Kolber M, Amico K, et al., editors. The spectrum of engagement in HIV prevention: Proposal for a PrEP cascade. 7th International conference on HIV treatment and prevention adherence; 2012; Miami Beach, Florida.
- Braschi CD, Sly JR, Singh S, Villagra C, Jandorf L. Increasing colonoscopy screening for Latino Americans through a patient navigation model: a randomized clinical trial. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014 Oct;16(5):934-40. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9848-y.
- Enard KR, Nevarez L, Hernandez M, Hovick SR, Moguel MR, Hajek RA, Blinka CE, Jones LA, Torres-Vigil I. Patient navigation to increase colorectal cancer screening among Latino Medicare enrollees: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Sep;26(9):1351-9. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0620-6. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
- Wilson FA, Villarreal R, Stimpson JP, Pagan JA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a colonoscopy screening navigator program designed for Hispanic men. J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):260-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0718-7.
- Medsharing I. Randomizer for Clinical Trial. Fontenay Sous Bois, France: Medsharing, Inc.; 2016.
- Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernandez ME. Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach. Third ed. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass; 2011
- Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK. The UCSF Client Satisfaction Scales: I. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. In: Maruish ME, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 3. 3rd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004
- McKenna SP, Doward LC. The translation and cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):89-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.08203.x. No abstract available.
- Swaine-Verdier A, Doward LC, Hagell P, Thorsen H, McKenna SP. Adapting quality of life instruments. Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7 Suppl 1:S27-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.7s107.x.
- Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
- Knodel J. The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. 1. London: Sage Publications; 1993. p. 35-50.
- Inc. SI. SAS software version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2013.
- Blashill AJ, Gordon JR, Rojas SA, Ramers CB, Lin CD, Carrizosa CM, Nogg KA, Lamb KM, Lucido NC, Jones IJ, Rivera D, Cobian Aguilar RA, Brady JP, Fuentes M, Wells KJ. Pilot randomised controlled trial of a patient navigation intervention to enhance engagement in the PrEP continuum among young Latino MSM: a protocol paper. BMJ Open. 2021 May 26;11(5):e040955. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040955.
Helpful Links
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and Gay and Bisexual Men 2018 [February 2, 2019].
- Family Health Centers of San Diego. LGBT services 2015 [cited 2019 February 22].
- United States Census Bureau. QuickFacts: San Diego County, California; California 2019 [April 13, 2019].
- Newport F, Gates G. San Francisco Metro Area Ranks Highest in LGBT Percentage 2015 [cited 2016 June 1].
- US Public Health Service. Preexposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2014 Clinical Practice Guideline 2014 [cited 2017 January 5].
- Family Health Centers of San Diego. Welcome to gay men's health service 2015 [February 11, 2019].
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Infections
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- Immune System Diseases
- Slow Virus Diseases
- HIV Infections
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Other Study ID Numbers
- HS-2017-0187
- 1R34MH114699-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Completed
-
University of Massachusetts, BostonCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityJanssen Services, LLCCompleted
-
ViiV HealthcareJohns Hopkins University; Pfizer; Vanderbilt University; University of North Carolina...Completed
-
Medical College of WisconsinCompleted
-
Emory UniversityCompleted
-
Rhode Island HospitalUnknown
-
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, IrelandCompleted
-
Lampiris, Harry W., M.D.AbbottUnknown
Clinical Trials on Patient Navigation
-
University of Colorado, DenverDenver Health and Hospital Authority; Rocky Mountain Human Services; El Grupo...Completed
-
University of UtahUniversity of PittsburghCompletedPregnancy Related | Pregnancy, High Risk | Opioid-Related DisordersUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalAmerican Cancer Society, Inc.CompletedTobacco Use | Lung Cancer | HomelessnessUnited States
-
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion...Global Cancer InstituteCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompleted
-
Emory UniversityCompletedEnd-Stage Renal DiseaseUnited States
-
The Netherlands Cancer InstituteUnknown
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedColorectal CancerUnited States
-
Boston Medical CenterCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaMedical University of Lodz; Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain; Universitat... and other collaboratorsRecruitingCancerAustria, Greece, Poland, Spain