Freestyle Prosthesis for Aortic Root-replacement With and Without Hemiarch Replacement

August 23, 2019 updated by: Alicja Zientara, Triemli Hospital

Freestyle Prosthesis for Aortic Root-replacement With and Without Hemiarch Replacement in Various Pathologies: A Retrospective Analysis

The Freestyle® prosthesis (Medtronic plc, Dublin, Ireland) is a biological, porcine aortic root implanted in various combinations and techniques since the 1990s. The main indication for the choice of this prosthesis is a combined pathology with degenerated aortic valve and additional dilatation of the root often involving the ascending aorta.

The Freestyle® prosthesis is also used in cases of dissection of the ascending aorta with the involvement of the aortic valve, which opens the debate on how far the ascending aorta should be replaced for a sustainable solution with calculable low periprocedural risk. Considering a lower intraoperative risk in the life-threatening situation, an extended resection of the aorta can be avoided and only the aortic root replaced with a piece of ascending aorta. On the contrary, focusing on improved long-term outcome, the technique of total arch replacement in aortic dissection was developed in emergency situations with acceptable results, which, however, were often reproducible only in large, experienced centers.

Apart from the abovementioned options, the technique of proximal arch replacement can provide a tension-free anastomosis. The intention of hemiarch replacement is the attachment of the prosthesis to an aneurysm-free portion of the aortic arch helping to protect against further anastomotic aneurysms and spare the patient complex reoperation or interventional procedures in the future. As a possible drawback of the technique, especially in emergency situations, the potentially prolonged duration of surgery and the need of selective brain perfusion via axillary or carotid artery are discussed increasing the risk of stroke and further major events, which could not be reflected in current literature. However, there is still no convincing evidence of a long-term benefit in terms of re-operation and survival after hemiarch replacement.

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the mid-term outcome of the biological Freestyle® prosthesis in combination with operations on the ascending aorta and the aortic arch with regard to prosthetic performance, reoperations, stroke and death.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

278

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8063
        • Triemli Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

From September 2007 till March 2017, we performed 278 aortic root replacements with the Freestyle prosthesis at a single centre in Switzerland. Two groups were identified based on the additional replacement of the hemiarch resulting in 119 patients (HA) and 159 patients without an additional hemiarch replacement (non-HA). Patients with additional valve and coronary artery procedures were included as well. Out of the non-HA group, 7 patients were cannulated through the femoral artery and excluded for further analysis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients after implantation of a biological Medtronic Freestyle root prosthesis in the time frame from November 2007 till April 2017
  • elective, urgent and emergency operations on ascending aneurysms, aortic dissections, endocarditis and aortic root pathologies
  • combination of other procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, operations on mitral and tricuspid valve, ablations)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refused patient consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hemiarch
Patients with Freestyle aortic root implantation receiving a hemiarch replacement by open anastomosis technique with axillary cannulation and antegrade cerebral perfusion
Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis. Some patients receive additional hemiarch replacement performing an open anastomosis to the aortic arch under antegrade cerebral perfusion through axillary artery. Comparison with patients, who were cannulated and perfused systemically
Non-Hemiarch
Patients with Freestyle aortic root implantation without hemiarch replacement with normal systemic perfusion
Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis. Some patients receive additional hemiarch replacement performing an open anastomosis to the aortic arch under antegrade cerebral perfusion through axillary artery. Comparison with patients, who were cannulated and perfused systemically

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after initial operation
In-hospital mortality
30 days after initial operation
Major and minor in-hospital complications
Time Frame: 30 days after initial operation
stroke, myocardial infarction, re-operation, pacemaker implantation
30 days after initial operation
Valve performance
Time Frame: earliest to longest follow up (longest follow up period of 10 years)
Mean valve gradient of the implanted root prosthesis
earliest to longest follow up (longest follow up period of 10 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alicja Zientara, MD, Triemli Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endocarditis

Clinical Trials on Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis with and without hemiarch replacement

Subscribe