Early Versus Deferred Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation (TIAMAR)

November 20, 2023 updated by: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Early Versus Deferred Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis Combined With Mitral Regurgitation: a Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the present study is to investigate safety and efficacy of early versus deferred aortic valve replacement in patients with moderate aortic stenosis combined with moderate mitral regurgitation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In more than one-half of all patients with valvular heart disease, more than a single valve is involved. Valvular aortic stenosis coexists with significant mitral valve disease in up to one-third of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease provide recommendations for isolated valvular lesions; data to guide timing of intervention in patients with multivalvular disease is however scarce. Currently, patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) in combination with mitral regurgitation have an indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR) only if the concomitant mitral regurgitation meets an indication for surgery. However, the hemodynamic stress of combined valvular lesions is greater than its individual components, and patients may benefit from early intervention.

Furthermore, the presence of multivalvular heart disease complicates the assessment of individual valvular lesions. In patients with combined AS and mitral regurgitation (MR), increased left ventricular pressure exacerbates the mitral regurgitant volume. Conversely, decreased forward flow across the aortic valve underestimates the severity of aortic stenosis when assessed by a pressure gradient.

Standard cut-off values inadequately reflect the hemodynamic stress in concomitant aortic and mitral valve disease, and recommendations for the timing of valvular replacement fail to account for the complex interplay of multiple valvular lesions.

Timing of intervention in patients with combined AS and MR is therefore challenging and evidence on the optimal timing of intervention is scarce.

Thus, the objective of the present study is to investigate safety and efficacy of early versus deferred aortic valve replacement in patients with moderate aortic stenosis combined with at least moderate mitral regurgitation.

Patients with combined aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation will be screened for eligibility. If eligible and informed consent is provided, patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to early (within 3 months) or deferred aortic valve replacement (with or without mitral valve intervention).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Recruiting
        • Insel Gruppe AG, Inselspital Bern
        • Contact:
          • Thomas Pilgrim, Prof
      • Geneva, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Geneva (HUG)
        • Contact:
          • Stephane Noble, Prof
      • Zürich, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Heart Clinic Hirslanden
        • Contact:
          • Peter Wenaweser, Prof

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Moderate native aortic stenosis defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.5 cm2 and >1.0 cm2 and transvalvular mean gradient ≥20 mmHg and <40 mmHg.
  • Primary or secondary mitral regurgitation (at least moderate) defined by effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) ≥20 mm2 or regurgitant volume ≥30 ml
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy <1 year irrespective of valvular heart disease
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <30% or LVESD >70mm
  • Echocardiographic evidence of severe right ventricular dysfunction
  • Untreated clinically significant CAD requiring revascularisation
  • Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation
  • Severe tricuspid valve disease requiring intervention
  • Symptomatic patients with severe primary MR who are operable and not high risk
  • Patients with severe secondary MR who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and who are judged appropriate for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair or surgery by the Heart Team
  • Transcatheter or surgical treatment of valvular and/or coronary artery disease within 90 days prior to randomization
  • COPD with home oxygen therapy
  • Estimated or measured systolic PAP >70 mmHg
  • Stroke within 30 days prior to the randomization
  • Inability to provide written informed consent
  • Participation in another cardiovascular trial before reaching the primary endpoint.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement
Early transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement with or without transcatheter or surgical mitral valve repair/replacement.
Early transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement with or without transcatheter or surgical mitral valve repair/replacement.
Other: Control Intervention
Deferred treatment, with intervention once AVA is ≤1.0 cm2 or if concomitant mitral regurgitation meets an indication for intervention.
Deferred transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement with or without transcatheter or surgical mitral valve repair/replacement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome will be a composite of all-cause death, stroke, and unplanned hospitalization for heart failure related to valvular heart disease at 2 years.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause death
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of all-cause death within study participation
5 years
Cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with Cardiovascular death within study participation
5 years
Neurologic events
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with stroke, symptomatic hypoxic-ischaemic injury, TIA and evaluation
5 years
Hospitalization for heart failure
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients who need hospitalization for heart failure within study participation and evaluation
5 years
New-onset atrial fibrillation
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation within study participation and evaluation
5 years
Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with atrioventricular conductance disturbance requiring the implantation of a permanent pacemaker
5 years
Aortic or mitral valve re-intervention
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with Aortic or mitral valve re-intervention within study participation and evaluation
5 years
NYHA functional class
Time Frame: 5 years
Measurement of NYHA functional class within study participation
5 years
Days alive out of hospital (DAOH)
Time Frame: 5 years
Calculation of days alive out of hospital (DAOH) within study participation
5 years
The evaluation Health-related quality of life assessment by means of the KCCQ 12 questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 years
Record the health-related quality of life assessment by means of the KCCQ 12 questionnaire within study participation
5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major vascular complications (VARC-3)
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with major vascular complications within the study population and evaluation
5 years
Cardiac structural complications (major, minor) (VARC-3)
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with cardiac structural complications within the study population and evaluation
5 years
Cerebrovascular events (disabling and non-disabling stroke, and TIA) (VARC-3)
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with Cerebrovascular events (disabling and non-disabling stroke, and TIA) (VARC-3) within the study population and evaluation
5 years
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with Myocardial infarction within the study population and evaluation
5 years
Acute kidney injury (VARC-3)
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with acute kidney injury (VARC-3) within the study population and evaluation
5 years
Access-related non-vascular major complications (VARC-3)
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients with access-related non-vascular major complications (VARC-3) within the study population and evaluation
5 years
Bleeding type 3-5 (VARC-3)
Time Frame: 5 years
Record all bleeding type 3-5 (VARC-3) within the study population
5 years
Prosthetic valve endocarditis
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients Prosthetic valve endocarditis within the study population
5 years
Prosthetic valve thrombosis
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients prosthetic valve thrombosis within the study population
5 years
Valve-related dysfunction requiring reintervention
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of patients valve-related dysfunction requiring reintervention within the study population
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Pilgrim, Prof. Dr., Insel Gruppe AG

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis Combined With Mitral Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement with or without transcatheter or surgical mitral valve repair/replacement

Subscribe