Multiple Interventions to Prevent Cognitive Decline (MIND)

September 2, 2019 updated by: Universidade do Porto

The investigators aim to test the feasibility of a pragmatic non-pharmacological strategy, that may prevent cognitive decline in patients with mild cognitive impairment. This strategy is based on five different interventions: cognitive training, physical activity, nutrition education, adaption to memory loss, diagnosis and correction of hearing impairment.

A quasi-experimental study will be implemented in Porto (Portugal), including patients that fulfill all of the following criteria: a) age 18-85 years; b) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score greater than or equal to two standard deviations below the normative reference value for the corresponding age and education level in the Portuguese population OR diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment, performed by a Neurologist, during the six previous months, considering the results of a neuropsychological battery; c) Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) Dementia Risk Score of at least six points. Patients who have any medical disability that contraindicates physical activity or have a lack of autonomy in daily activities will be excluded.

The program will be implemented in groups of 10 participants, over a period of 10 consecutive months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Detailed description

This is a quasi-experimental study in which the investigators aim to test the feasibility of a non-pharmacological strategy to prevent cognitive decline in patients with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. This strategy is based on five different interventions:

a) Cognitive training

This comprises training using using the cogweb software, both in person and remotely:

i) in person training: 30-minute sessions, supervised by a trained nurse, twice weekly .

ii) remote training: unsupervised 30-minute sessions, to be performed at home at the participants will.

b) Physical activity This is based on 60-minute sessions including aerobic, resistance, agility/balance and flexibility exercises, directed by a physical education teacher and supervised by a nurse, twice weekly.

c) Nutrition education

This is based on monthly 180-minute sessions, directed by a nutritionist, comprising:

i) Presentation and discussion of healthy and easy to cook recipes by the nutritionist; ii) Preparation of healthy meals by the participants, followed by a period of social interaction between the participants while consuming the meals prepared.

d) Adaptation to memory loss This is based on monthly 30-minute sessions, directed by a psychologist or a nurse, who will provide strategies that participants may use in their daily life to cope with memory loss.

e) Diagnosis of hearing impairment Before implementing the sessions of cognitive training, physical activity, nutrition education and adaption to memory loss, an audiologist will perform an audiogram to all participants. Those with auditive performance inferior to the reference values will be referred for a medical appointment with an otolaryngologist.

Strategies (a),(b), (c) and (d) will be implemented over a period of 10 months, in groups of 10 participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

a) Age 18-85 years;

b1) Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≥ to two standard deviations below the normative reference value for the corresponding age and education level in the Portuguese population;

OR

b2) clinical diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment;

c) Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia Dementia Risk Score ≥ six points.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. medical disability that contraindicates physical activity;
  2. lack of autonomy in daily activities.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-pharmacological intervention

Non-pharmacological strategy, implemented in groups of 10 participants, over 10 consecutive months, based on five different interventions:

cognitive training, physical activity; nutrition education; adaption to memory loss; detection and correction of hearing impairment.

This comprises training using using the cogweb software, both in person and remotely:

i) in person training: 30-minute sessions, supervised by a trained nurse, twice weekly .

ii) remote training: unsupervised 30-minute sessions, to be performed at home at the participants will.

This is based on 60-minute sessions including aerobic, resistance, agility/balance and flexibility exercises, directed by a physical education teacher and supervised by a nurse, twice weekly.

This is based on monthly 180-minute sessions, directed by a nutritionist, comprising:

i) Presentation and discussion of healthy and easy to cook recipes by the nutritionist; ii) Preparation of healthy meals by the participants, followed by a period of social interaction between the participants while consuming the meals prepared.

This is based on monthly 30-minute sessions, directed by a psychologist or a nurse, who will provide strategies that participants may use in their daily life to cope with memory loss.
Before implementing the sessions of cognitive training, physical activity, nutrition education and adaption to memory loss, an audiologist will perform an audiogram to all participants. Those with auditive performance inferior to the reference values will be referred for a medical appointment with an otolaryngologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive performance 1
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's cognitive performance assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, between the baseline assessment and the end of follow-up. This scale varies from 0 (worst cognitive performance) to 30 points (best cognitive performance).
10 months
Body mass index
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's body mass index between the baseline assessment and the end of follow-up.
10 months
Adherence to the Mediterranean diet
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's self-reported adherence to the Mediterranean diet, assessed using the Mediterranean food pattern (PREDIMED) scale, between the baseline assessment and the end of follow-up. This scale varies from 0 (lowest adherence to the Mediterranean diet) to 14 points (highest adherence to the Mediterranean diet). A score over 10 points indicates good adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
10 months
Number of steps
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's number of steps, assessed using a portable accelerometer, between the baseline assessment and the end of follow-up.
10 months
Adherence to each intervention
Time Frame: 10 months
Proportion of adherence to each intervention and component of each intervention, calculated as the number of sessions attended/total number of sessions implemented. For remote cognitive training the outcome will be the absolute number of sessions.
10 months
Dropout
Time Frame: 10 months
Proportion of participants who dropped out of the study, calculated as the number of participants who dropped out after attending at least one session/total number of participants who attended at least one session.
10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive performance 2
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's cognitive performance assessed using a neuropsychological battery, between the baseline assessment and the end of follow-up. This will be reported in the format of a Z-score, assuming positive and negative values. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
10 months
Memory complaints
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of the self-reported memory complaints, assessed using the self-reported memory complaints scale, between the baseline assessment and the end of follow-up. This scale varies from 0 (best score) to 21 points (worst score). Scores over three points indicate the presence of self-reported memory complaints.
10 months
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of the anxiety and depression scores, assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), between the baseline assessment and the end of follow-up. This scale varies from 0 (best score) to 21 points (worst score).
10 months
Reported quality of life: EQ-5D scale
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's quality of life, assessed using the EuroQol Group scale - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) scale, between the baseline assessment and 10 months after the beginning of the intervention. This is assessed using two subscales: a) five multiple choice questions, with five response possibilities, which produce a score that varies from 5 (best score) to 25 points (worst score); b) visual analogic scale, that varies from 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score).
10 months
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's handgrip strength, assessed using a dynamometer, between the baseline assessment and 10 months after the beginning of the intervention.
10 months
Agility 1
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's agility and balance, assessed using the Time Up and Go Test scale, between the baseline assessment and 10 months after the beginning of the intervention. This is measured in time units (seconds) and varies from 0 (best score) to infinite (worst score).
10 months
Agility 2
Time Frame: 10 months
Variation of participant's agility and balance, assessed using the One Leg Balance Test, between the baseline assessment and 10 months after the beginning of the intervention. This is measured in time units (seconds) and varies from 0 (best score) to infinite (worst score).
10 months
Time of follow-up
Time Frame: 10 months
Number of days between the first and the last session attended by the participant.
10 months
Implemented sessions
Time Frame: 10 months
Proportion of sessions implemented, calculated as the number of sessions that the research team was able to implement/total number of sessions planned.
10 months
Complete assessment of participants
Time Frame: 10 months
For each study outcome, proportion of participants with complete information, calculated at baseline and different moments of follow-up, as the number of participants with complete information/total number of participants evaluated.
10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: João Firmino-Machado, MD, PhD, Instituto de Saude Publica da Universidade do Porto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Cognitive training

3
Subscribe