AAI in Elderly Patient With Chronic Pain

Animal-assisted Intervention in Geriatric Patients With Chronic Joint Pain and Polypharmacy

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, there is a progressive aging of population. Chronic osteoarticular pain is associated to a bigger consumption of medication and a deterioration of life quality in elderly people that could be improved by boosting education for health from Primary Health Care. JUSTIFICATION: The need to develop non pharmacological treatments in order to get better results in people's global care. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectivity of group intervention, based on Animal Assisted Therapy, on elderly people suffering from chronic osteoarticular pain and poli-medication; regarding decrease of chronic pain, use of analgesics and improvement of life quality. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Randomized clinical trial, two arms, controlled and open-label. Twelve group sessions of kinesiotherapy with the intervention of a therapy dog in the experimental group (EG), carried out in the Primary Health Centre.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥65 years
  • diagnosis of chronic benign joint pain
  • polypharmacy (>5 drugs or active ingredients, of which 2 or more had been prescribed for pain)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe cognitive deterioration (GDS> 5)
  • allergy to or fear of animals

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group
The experimental Group underwent a therapeutic intervention based on sessions of kinesitherapy , which is defined as a set of "therapeutic procedures that use movement for the treatment and prevention of diseases of the locomotive apparatus". The experimental group also underwent AAT. We conducted a total of 12 weekly sessions of 60 minutes each with 10 participants.
The sessions were held in the primary care centre, and had specific objectives agreed in advance by the research team. The sessions had the following schedule: Session 1, lower extremities in sitting position; Session 2, upper extremities in sitting position; Session 3, cervical spine in sitting position; Session 4, dorsal spine in sitting position; Session 5, lumbar spine in sitting position; Session 6, Static Standing and Upper Extremities; Session 7, Static Standing; Sessions 8, 9, 10 and 11, Dynamic Standing; and Session 12, Safety Reinforcement.
Active Comparator: Control Group
The Control Group underwent a therapeutic intervention based on sessions of kinesitherapy , which is defined as a set of "therapeutic procedures that use movement for the treatment and prevention of diseases of the locomotive apparatus" without the presence of the therapy dog.
The sessions were held in the primary care centre, and had specific objectives agreed in advance by the research team. The sessions had the following schedule: Session 1, lower extremities in sitting position; Session 2, upper extremities in sitting position; Session 3, cervical spine in sitting position; Session 4, dorsal spine in sitting position; Session 5, lumbar spine in sitting position; Session 6, Static Standing and Upper Extremities; Session 7, Static Standing; Sessions 8, 9, 10 and 11, Dynamic Standing; and Session 12, Safety Reinforcement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Universities Osteoarthritis Index at 13 weeks
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
pain (0-20), stiffness (0-8), functional capacity (0-68)
This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Lattinen test at 13 weeks
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
Assesses pain and any incapacity caused by pain, as well as its frequency and intensity, the amount of painkillers taken, and whether sleep is disturbed
This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
Change from baseline EuroQoL Health Questionnaire at 13 weeks
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
Is a generic self-administered instrument for measuring quality of life related to health
This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
Change from baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire at 13 weeks
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
Is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses one's ability to perform day-to-day activities, as well as functional capacity
This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 1
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 1 and through session 1 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 1 and through session 1 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 2
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 2 and through session 2 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 2 and through session 2 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 3
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 3 and through session 3 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 3 and through session 3 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 4
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 4 and through session 4 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 4 and through session 4 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 5
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 5 and through session 5 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 5 and through session 5 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 6
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 6 and through session 6 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 6 and through session 6 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 7
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 7 and through session 7 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 7 and through session 7 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 8
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 8 and through session 8 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 8 and through session 8 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 9
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 9 and through session 9 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 9 and through session 9 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 10
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 10 and through session 10 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 10 and through session 10 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 11
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 11 and through session 11 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 11 and through session 11 completion, an average of 1 hour
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 12
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 12 and through session 12 completion, an average of 1 hour
Is a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 12 and through session 12 completion, an average of 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marta Ortega Bravo, PhD, IDIAPJGol

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IDIAPJordiGol

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Animal-assisted therapy

3
Subscribe