- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04079985
AAI in Elderly Patient With Chronic Pain
September 3, 2019 updated by: Fundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i Gurina
Animal-assisted Intervention in Geriatric Patients With Chronic Joint Pain and Polypharmacy
BACKGROUND: Nowadays, there is a progressive aging of population.
Chronic osteoarticular pain is associated to a bigger consumption of medication and a deterioration of life quality in elderly people that could be improved by boosting education for health from Primary Health Care.
JUSTIFICATION: The need to develop non pharmacological treatments in order to get better results in people's global care.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectivity of group intervention, based on Animal Assisted Therapy, on elderly people suffering from chronic osteoarticular pain and poli-medication; regarding decrease of chronic pain, use of analgesics and improvement of life quality.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Randomized clinical trial, two arms, controlled and open-label.
Twelve group sessions of kinesiotherapy with the intervention of a therapy dog in the experimental group (EG), carried out in the Primary Health Centre.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
69
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
65 years and older (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥65 years
- diagnosis of chronic benign joint pain
- polypharmacy (>5 drugs or active ingredients, of which 2 or more had been prescribed for pain)
Exclusion Criteria:
- severe cognitive deterioration (GDS> 5)
- allergy to or fear of animals
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental Group
The experimental Group underwent a therapeutic intervention based on sessions of kinesitherapy , which is defined as a set of "therapeutic procedures that use movement for the treatment and prevention of diseases of the locomotive apparatus".
The experimental group also underwent AAT.
We conducted a total of 12 weekly sessions of 60 minutes each with 10 participants.
|
The sessions were held in the primary care centre, and had specific objectives agreed in advance by the research team.
The sessions had the following schedule: Session 1, lower extremities in sitting position; Session 2, upper extremities in sitting position; Session 3, cervical spine in sitting position; Session 4, dorsal spine in sitting position; Session 5, lumbar spine in sitting position; Session 6, Static Standing and Upper Extremities; Session 7, Static Standing; Sessions 8, 9, 10 and 11, Dynamic Standing; and Session 12, Safety Reinforcement.
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
The Control Group underwent a therapeutic intervention based on sessions of kinesitherapy , which is defined as a set of "therapeutic procedures that use movement for the treatment and prevention of diseases of the locomotive apparatus" without the presence of the therapy dog.
|
The sessions were held in the primary care centre, and had specific objectives agreed in advance by the research team.
The sessions had the following schedule: Session 1, lower extremities in sitting position; Session 2, upper extremities in sitting position; Session 3, cervical spine in sitting position; Session 4, dorsal spine in sitting position; Session 5, lumbar spine in sitting position; Session 6, Static Standing and Upper Extremities; Session 7, Static Standing; Sessions 8, 9, 10 and 11, Dynamic Standing; and Session 12, Safety Reinforcement.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Universities Osteoarthritis Index at 13 weeks
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
|
pain (0-20), stiffness (0-8), functional capacity (0-68)
|
This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline Lattinen test at 13 weeks
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
|
Assesses pain and any incapacity caused by pain, as well as its frequency and intensity, the amount of painkillers taken, and whether sleep is disturbed
|
This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
|
Change from baseline EuroQoL Health Questionnaire at 13 weeks
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
|
Is a generic self-administered instrument for measuring quality of life related to health
|
This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
|
Change from baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire at 13 weeks
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
|
Is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses one's ability to perform day-to-day activities, as well as functional capacity
|
This questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 1
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 1 and through session 1 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 1 and through session 1 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 2
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 2 and through session 2 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 2 and through session 2 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 3
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 3 and through session 3 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 3 and through session 3 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 4
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 4 and through session 4 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 4 and through session 4 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 5
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 5 and through session 5 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 5 and through session 5 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 6
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 6 and through session 6 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 6 and through session 6 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 7
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 7 and through session 7 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 7 and through session 7 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 8
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 8 and through session 8 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 8 and through session 8 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 9
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 9 and through session 9 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 9 and through session 9 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 10
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 10 and through session 10 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 10 and through session 10 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 11
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 11 and through session 11 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 11 and through session 11 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 12
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 12 and through session 12 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Is a subjective assessment of pain.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'.
The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints.
The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
|
This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 12 and through session 12 completion, an average of 1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Marta Ortega Bravo, PhD, IDIAPJGol
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 3, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
September 6, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 6, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 3, 2019
Last Verified
July 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IDIAPJordiGol
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i GarrafRecruitingChronic Post Operative Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Knee PainSpain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
-
University of UtahRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic PainUnited States
-
Evolve Restorative CenterFlowonix Medical; Celéri Health, Inc.; Advanced Infusion SolutionsCompletedPain, Chronic | Pain, Intractable | Chronic Nonmalignant PainUnited States
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Thoracotomy | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionActive, not recruitingPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical, Biofeedback, Pain, Chronic
Clinical Trials on Animal-assisted therapy
-
Atlas UniversityNot yet recruitingDepression | Loneliness | Old Age; Debility | Nursing Home | Loss of Interest in Activities
-
Norwegian University of Life SciencesCompleted
-
Daniel Collado-MateoAsociación Dame La PataRecruitingWork Related Stress | Occupational GroupsSpain
-
Daniel Collado-MateoPurina España (Reg. Trademark of Nestle S.A.)Enrolling by invitationEating Disorders | Eating Disorders in Adolescence | Anorexia Nervosa/BulimiaSpain
-
Daniel Collado-MateoAsociación de Padres de Personas Con Autismo (APNA); Asociación Nuevo Horizonte and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationAutism Spectrum Disorder | AutismSpain
-
Uskudar UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUnknownSchizophrenia | Animal-assisted TherapyTaiwan
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedHospitalized PatientsUnited States
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. MatteoCompleted
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompleted