A Dog-assisted Therapy to Reduce Burnout Among Professionals Working in a School for Special Education

October 27, 2021 updated by: Daniel Collado-Mateo

Effects of a Dog-assisted Therapy on Quality of Life, Work Engagement and Burnout Among Professionals Working in a School for Special Education

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of an 8-week program consisting of dog-assisted therapy on the work engagement, burnout, pain, and quality of life among professionals working in a School for Special Education. A total of 30 participants will be involved in the program, which will be comprised of eight 50-min sessions conducted once a week. The hypothesis of the researchers in this study is that this program will achieve a reduction in burnout levels in workers, as well as an improvement in engagement and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Animal-assisted interventions have shown numerous benefits in different populations including children with cerebral palsy or autism spectrum disorder, people with chronic pain, older adults, or people in prison. Recently, different initiatives have been carried out focused on improving the work environment, especially among professionals in clinical settings and obtaining benefits in mood, as well as a reduction in the levels of stress and burnout of employees. In addition, it has also been observed that these animals in the workplace can produce an improvement in health, productivity or job satisfaction.

The presence of stress or anxiety among professionals working in Special Education Schools has been previously reported and could increase burnout and reduce the engagement and health-related quality of life of these workers.

Therefore, the current randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of an 8-week program consisting of dog-assisted therapy on the work engagement, burnout, pain, and quality of life among professionals working in a School for Special Education. A total of 30 participants will be involved in the program, which will be comprised of eight 50-min sessions conducted once a week. The hypothesis of the researchers is that this program will achieve a reduction in burnout levels in workers, as well as an improvement in engagement and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Móstoles, Madrid, Spain, 28933
        • Recruiting
        • King Juan Carlos University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Beatriz Rivera Martín, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Luis Lucio Lobato Rincón, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ana Myriam Lavín Pérez, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Isabel Gómez-Calcerrada, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jaime Ramírez Aragonés, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Myriam Díaz Hernández, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jesús Morenas Martín, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Cristina Martín Sánchez, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be aged >18 years
  • be workers in a School for Special Education
  • work in direct contact with children (teachers, physiotherapists, etc.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with dog-allergy
  • People with dog phobia
  • People with a history of impulsive animal aggression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
They will be on a waiting list. They will be assessed before and after the 8 week program but will not take part in it.
Experimental: Experimental group
Participants in this group will take part in the 8 sessions of dog-assisted therapy. They will be assessed before and after the 8 week program.
The program will involve 8 sessions, conducted once a week for 8 weeks. Each session will include three parts: 1) a welcome part aimed to get in touch with the dog, 2) a main part, where participants will be taught basic notions about dog training and then try to train the dogs. In this part, the patients will perform different activities and exercises with the dog. 3) A closing part to relaxation and say goodbye to the dogs.
Other Names:
  • animal-assisted therapy
  • animal-assisted intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Burnout levels assessed using the Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
The Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire (BCSQ-36) evaluates by means of 36 items the burnout of the participants. Each of the items can be scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 7; 1 being totally disagree and 7 being totally agree. In addition, the questionnaire is divided into 3 subtypes with their respective dimensions: Frantic subtype (Involvement, Ambition and Overload), Unchallenged subtype (Indifference, Boredom and Lack of Development), Worn-out subtype (Abandonment, Lack of Control and Lack of Recognition). The Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire (BCSQ-12) also assesses burnout and is calculated with the items of the BCSQ-36.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Changes in Burnout levels assessed using the Burnout Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
The Burnout Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is a tool for the assessment of burnout, as an antithesis of the UWES questionnaire focused on engagement. This questionnaire consists of 22 items that give rise to 3 dimensions: Emotional exhaustion (decrease and loss of energy or emotional resources); Depersonalization or Cynicism (negative attitudes and feelings towards the people for whom the work is intended) and Lack of personal accomplishment or professional efficacy (tendency of professionals to evaluate themselves negatively).
At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Changes in Burnout levels assessed using one Item for Burnout assessment
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
One Item for Burnout assessment where under the statement of "In general, according to your definition of burnout, how would you rate your level of burnout?" participants have 5 response options from "I enjoy my work. I have no symptoms of burnout" to "I feel completely burned out and often wonder if I can keep going. I am at a point where I may need some changes or should seek some kind of help."
At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in work engagement
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Assessed through the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), which is a scale widely used for the evaluation of engagement in the workplace . It is composed of 17 items distributed in three factors: 1) vigor (6 items, e.g., "In my work I feel full of energy"), 2) dedication (6 items, e.g., "My work has meaning") and 3) absorption (5 items, e.g., "When I am working I forget everything that happens around me"). It consists of a seven-item Likert scale (from 0 = "never" to 6 = "always").
At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Changes in Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
It will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire (EuroQoL 5 dimensions 5 levels): it is a questionnaire consisting of 5 dimensions with 5 levels of response, the first dimension refers to mobility, the second to personal care, the third to daily activities, the fourth to pain/discomfort, and the fifth to anxiety and depression.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Changes in Health Status
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
It will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale of the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire (EuroQoL 5 dimensions 5 levels). It is represented as a thermometer ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst state of health that can be imagined and 100 is the best state of health imaginable.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Changes in pain
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Assessed through a visual analog pain scale, which is represented as a thermometer ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 is the absence of pain and 100 the highest pain level imaginable
At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Changes in blood pressure
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure using the Omron MIT Elite Plus Oscillometer
At baseline and immediately after the intervention (within 7 days after the last session)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Collado-Mateo, PhD, Rey Juan Carlos University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 23, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Work Related Stress

Clinical Trials on Dog-assisted therapy

3
Subscribe