- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04080128
Examination of Myopia Progression and Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control (BLINK2)
Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanisms of Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- Ohio State University
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77204
- University of Houston
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants in the BLINK Study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Contact lens
The first two years of the study all participants will wear +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses.
The last year of the study, all subjects will be wearing single vision contact lenses.
|
2.50 D multifocal contact lens years 1 and 2. Year 3 all wear a single vision contact lens.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Statistical Correlation Between Three-year Change in Choroidal Thickness and Three-year Change in Axial Length
Time Frame: Three years
|
test the hypothesis that thinner subfoveal choroidal thickness (a layer of blood vessels) is associated with the outcome of greater axial elongation (eye growth) The hypothesis relates to the two years of multifocal contact lens wear and one year of single vision contact lens wear. As such, it uses the entire sample which experiences the same contact lens wear in the BLINK2 Study. |
Three years
|
|
The Statistical Correlation Between iPRGC Activity at BLINK2 Baseline and Three-year Change in Axial Length
Time Frame: Three years
|
test the hypothesis that less ipRGC activity (cells in the back of the eye as measured by blue light-driven inputs to the pupil response - measured by the blue decay coefficient) as measured at the Baseline BLINK 2 is associated with greater axial elongation (eye growth) over three years The hypothesis relates to the two years of multifocal contact lens wear and one year of single vision contact lens wear. As such, it uses the entire sample which experiences the same contact lens wear in the BLINK2 Study. |
Three years
|
|
The Statistical Correlation Between Light Levels Measured at Baseline and Three-year Change in Axial Length
Time Frame: Three years
|
test the hypothesis that exposure to light levels over 1000 lux as measured at the Baseline BLINK2 visit is associated with less axial elongation (eye growth) over three years The hypothesis relates to the two years of multifocal contact lens wear and one year of single vision contact lens wear. As such, it uses the entire sample which experiences the same contact lens wear in the BLINK2 Study. |
Three years
|
|
Three-year Choroidal Thickness Change
Time Frame: 3 years
|
The three-year change from baseline to three years for choroidal thickness.
|
3 years
|
|
Duration of Exposure to Light Levels Exceeding 1000 Lux at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline light exposure as measured by minutes at light levels over 1000 lux.
Light exposure was monitored using the Actiwatch2 (Phillips Respironics), a light-sensing and logging watch worn on the wrist.
Participants wore the device for a 1 week period to monitor environmental light exposure.
The illuminance was measured in lux every minute.
Data were scrubbed of periods where the watch was not worn or other artifacts.
Light levels over 1000 lux were added to determine time outdoors in minutes.
|
Baseline
|
|
Baseline iPRGC Activity
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline iPRGC activity (cells in the back of the eye as measured by blue light-driven inputs to the pupil response - measured by the blue decay coefficient).
The Blue Decay Coefficient represents the rate at which the pupil redilates in the dark after exposure to multiple 5-second pulses of red and blue light.
The redilation data are fit by an exponential decay function eβt where t is time in seconds and the coefficient β is the natural log of the percent change in pupil diameter per second.
Values range from -0.30 to -0.01.
More positive values represent slower pupil redilation and are associated with greater, potentially beneficial ipRGC activity.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accommodative Amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Testing the hypothesis that long-term soft bifocal contact lens wear does not alter accommodative amplitude.
This hypothesis predicts that at the baseline BLINK2 Study visit, the accommodative amplitude will be similar across the three treatment groups that were randomly assigned at the beginning of the BLINK Study (NCT02255474).
Assessed data from the beginning of the BLINK Study up to the BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit approximately 4.7 years, BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit reported
|
Baseline
|
|
Lag of Accommodation
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Testing the hypothesis that long-term soft bifocal contact lens wear does not alter accommodative lag.
This hypothesis predicts that at the baseline BLINK2 Study visit, the accommodative lag will be similar across the three treatment groups that were randomly assigned at the beginning of the BLINK Study (NCT02255474).
Assessed data from the beginning of the BLINK Study up to the BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit approximately 4.7 years, BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit reported.
|
Baseline
|
|
Accommodative Facility
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Testing the hypothesis that long-term soft bifocal contact lens wear does not alter accommodative facility.
This hypothesis predicts that at the baseline BLINK2 Study visit, the accommodative lag will be similar across the three treatment groups that were randomly assigned at the beginning of the BLINK Study (NCT02255474).
Assessed data from the beginning of the BLINK Study up to the BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit approximately 4.7 years, BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit reported.
|
Baseline
|
|
Slowing of Myopia Progression - Axial Length
Time Frame: Two year change (Baseline to 2-Year visit)
|
Test the hypothesis that wearing +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses slow rather than merely delay myopia progression. This null hypothesis predicts that during the first two years of the BLINK2 Study, when all subjects will wear +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses, axial length elongation at the same rate regardless of original lens assignment (i.e., +2.50 D multifocal lenses, +1.50 D multifocal lenses, SVLs). Alternatively, faster myopia progression in subjects originally fitted with soft bifocal contact lenses compared to single vision contact lenses would indicate a delay in myopia progression rather than a permanent treatment benefit. Measured as the change the baseline BLINK2 visit to the 2 year visit on the IOLMaster which is not the entire time frame of the study - as detailed in the specific aims from the funded grant proposal. Because the exposures before the baseline visit were part of NCT02255474 immediately before this cohort, the original groups were analyzed. |
Two year change (Baseline to 2-Year visit)
|
|
Rebound of Progression - Axial Length
Time Frame: One year change (2-year visit to 3-year visit)
|
The investigators will test the hypothesis that there is no increase in myopia when switching from +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses to single vision contact lenses in Year 2 of the BLINK2 observational study. This hypothesis predicts that the progression of myopia during the last year of follow-up when all subjects will switch to single vision contact lenses, will be similar to myopia progression during the first two years when all subjects wore multifocal contact lenses. Alternatively, faster progression after switching to single vision contact lens wear indicates a "rebound" of myopia progression. This aim was specifically designed to measure what happened between the 2nd and 3rd annual visit which is not the entire time frame of the study - as detailed in the specific aims from the funded grant proposal. Because the entire cohort was wearing the same contact lens, it uses all participants together. |
One year change (2-year visit to 3-year visit)
|
|
Rebound of Progression - Myopia Progression
Time Frame: One year change (2-year visit to 3-year visit)
|
The investigators will test the hypothesis that there is no increase in myopia, as measured by the change in the spherical equivalent, when switching from +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses to single vision contact lenses in Year 2 of the BLINK2 observational study. This hypothesis predicts that the progression of myopia during the last year of follow-up when all subjects will switch to single vision contact lenses, will be similar to myopia progression during the first two years when all subjects wore multifocal contact lenses. Alternatively, faster progression after switching to single vision contact lens wear indicates a "rebound" of myopia progression. This aim was specifically designed to measure what happened between the 2nd and 3rd annual visit which is not the entire time frame of the study - as detailed in the specific aims from the funded grant proposal. Because the entire cohort was wearing the same contact lens, it uses all participants together. |
One year change (2-year visit to 3-year visit)
|
|
Slowing of Myopia Progression - Myopia Progression
Time Frame: Two year change (Baseline visit to 2-year visit)
|
Test the hypothesis that wearing +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses slow rather than merely delay myopia progression. This null hypothesis predicts that during the first two years of the BLINK2 Study, when all subjects will wear +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses, participants will have myopia progression, as measured by spherical equivalent, at the same rate regardless of original lens assignment (i.e., +2.50 D multifocal lenses, +1.50 D multifocal lenses, SVLs). Alternatively, faster myopia progression in those with soft bifocal contact lenses compared to SVLs would indicate a delay in myopia progression rather than a permanent treatment benefit. Measured between Baseline and Year 2 of the BLINK2 Study which is not the entire time frame of the study - as detailed in the specific aims from the funded grant proposal. Because the exposures before the baseline visit were part of NCT02255474 immediately before this cohort, the original groups were analyzed. |
Two year change (Baseline visit to 2-year visit)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeffrey J Walline, OD PhD, The Ohio State University College of Optometry
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UG1EY023206 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myopia
-
Tianjin Medical University Eye HospitalNot yet recruitingProgressive Myopia | Pediatric Myopia | Orthokeratology-related Myopia Progression
-
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Not yet recruitingMyopia | Myopia, ProgressiveChina
-
SightGlass Vision, Inc.Recruiting
-
University of FaisalabadCompletedRefractive Errors | Myopia | Progressive MyopiaPakistan
-
SightGlass Vision, Inc.RecruitingMyopia | Myopia Progression | Juvenile MyopiaUnited States
-
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterEnrolling by invitationMyopia, Child Myopia ProgressionChina
-
He Eye HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University Eye Hospital, FreiburgActive, not recruiting
-
University of BradfordUniversity of Huddersfield; CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)Enrolling by invitationMyopia, ProgressiveUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Contact lenses
-
Aller, Thomas A., ODJohnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.CompletedMyopia | Esophoria | Fixation Disparity
-
Aston UniversityCooperVision, Inc.Enrolling by invitationContact Lens Wear | Healthy Participants Study | Contact Lens FitUnited Kingdom
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamRecruitingConcussion, Mild | Photophobia | Contact LensUnited States
-
Aston UniversityCollege of OptometristsCompletedHyperopia | Amblyopia | AnisohyperopiaUnited Kingdom
-
Ohio State UniversityRecruitingPresbyopia | Presbyopia CorrectionUnited States
-
University of BradfordUniversity of Huddersfield; CooperVision International Limited (CVIL)Enrolling by invitationMyopia, ProgressiveUnited Kingdom
-
Visioneering Technologies, IncActive, not recruitingMyopiaCanada, United States, Hong Kong, Singapore
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed
-
University of HoustonCompleted
-
CooperVision, Inc.Completed