Examination of Myopia Progression and Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control (BLINK2)

May 6, 2026 updated by: Jeffrey J. Walline, OD PhD, Ohio State University

Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanisms of Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control

This project intends to provide important, previously unmet answers regarding biological associations with myopia (nearsightedness) progression in order to improve the ability to predict patients who are most likely to benefit from myopia control, as well as questions frequently posed by patients and practitioners about the side effects, mechanism, and discontinuation of soft bifocal contact lens myopia control. The first three aims examine the association between biological variables that can be measured non-invasively and myopia progression, and they will be conducted regardless of the outcome of the currently in progress BLINK Study. The last three specific aims will be conducted if soft bifocal contact lenses slowed myopia progression by 30% or more in the BLINK Study, and they can be investigated with very few additional measurements.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary goal of the BLINK2 Study is to determine correlates of myopia progression using non-invasive measurement of biomarkers, such as choroidal thickness and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-mediated pupil function, and outdoor light exposure in children. If multifocal contact lenses slow the progression of myopia by 30 percent or more compared to single vision contact lenses during the BLINK Study, the investigators will also answer important questions about the consequences and mechanism of the treatment effect, such as whether multifocal contact lens wear alters accommodative function and whether or not the treatment benefit is transient. Specifically, the investigators will investigate whether myopia progression is slowed or simply delayed by multifocal contact lens wear and whether there is a rebound in myopia progression, an increase in progression rate, after discontinuation of multifocal contact lenses. The investigators will identify myopic children who will most benefit from myopia control by determining those who are most likely to progress, thereby maximizing the potential for benefit and minimizing risk. The investigators will accomplish this goal by investigating the effect on progression of the most important ocular and environmental risk factors recently hypothesized to control eye growth. The project will collect the most extensive longitudinal dataset ever on choroidal thickness in childhood myopia. The investigators will test the important question of whether time outdoors and light exposure influence myopia progression after onset in addition to whether these affects are mediated by intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. If soft multifocal contact lenses show a clinically meaningful slowing of myopia progression, we will also answer important questions asked routinely by our clinical colleagues. The investigators will know the accommodative effect of multiple years of multifocal contact lens wear in children, the investigators will know if multifocal contact lenses slow or simply delay myopia progression, and the investigators will know whether myopia progression increases following discontinuation of soft multifocal contact lens wear. Answers to questions addressed by this proposal could improve care for 60 million myopic children in the United States. While the consequences of ordinary myopia are rarely sight-threatening, the quality of life for myopic patients is negatively affected and the health care costs to treat myopia are approximately 4.6 billion dollars in 1990 US dollars. The National Eye Institute recognizes the need to evaluate the efficacy of potential treatments for delaying the onset or for slowing the progression of myopia, such as lenses that alter peripheral defocus. The BLINK2 Study seeks to maximize benefit while lowering the risk of multifocal contact lens wear for myopia control while answering important scientific and clinical questions about the consequences and mechanism of myopia progression, a problem that affects many people in the United States.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

248

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77204
        • University of Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Only those participants in the original BLINK Study who have consented to continue will be enrolled in BLINK2.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants in the BLINK Study

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Contact lens
The first two years of the study all participants will wear +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses. The last year of the study, all subjects will be wearing single vision contact lenses.
2.50 D multifocal contact lens years 1 and 2. Year 3 all wear a single vision contact lens.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Statistical Correlation Between Three-year Change in Choroidal Thickness and Three-year Change in Axial Length
Time Frame: Three years

test the hypothesis that thinner subfoveal choroidal thickness (a layer of blood vessels) is associated with the outcome of greater axial elongation (eye growth)

The hypothesis relates to the two years of multifocal contact lens wear and one year of single vision contact lens wear. As such, it uses the entire sample which experiences the same contact lens wear in the BLINK2 Study.

Three years
The Statistical Correlation Between iPRGC Activity at BLINK2 Baseline and Three-year Change in Axial Length
Time Frame: Three years

test the hypothesis that less ipRGC activity (cells in the back of the eye as measured by blue light-driven inputs to the pupil response - measured by the blue decay coefficient) as measured at the Baseline BLINK 2 is associated with greater axial elongation (eye growth) over three years

The hypothesis relates to the two years of multifocal contact lens wear and one year of single vision contact lens wear. As such, it uses the entire sample which experiences the same contact lens wear in the BLINK2 Study.

Three years
The Statistical Correlation Between Light Levels Measured at Baseline and Three-year Change in Axial Length
Time Frame: Three years

test the hypothesis that exposure to light levels over 1000 lux as measured at the Baseline BLINK2 visit is associated with less axial elongation (eye growth) over three years

The hypothesis relates to the two years of multifocal contact lens wear and one year of single vision contact lens wear. As such, it uses the entire sample which experiences the same contact lens wear in the BLINK2 Study.

Three years
Three-year Choroidal Thickness Change
Time Frame: 3 years
The three-year change from baseline to three years for choroidal thickness.
3 years
Duration of Exposure to Light Levels Exceeding 1000 Lux at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline light exposure as measured by minutes at light levels over 1000 lux. Light exposure was monitored using the Actiwatch2 (Phillips Respironics), a light-sensing and logging watch worn on the wrist. Participants wore the device for a 1 week period to monitor environmental light exposure. The illuminance was measured in lux every minute. Data were scrubbed of periods where the watch was not worn or other artifacts. Light levels over 1000 lux were added to determine time outdoors in minutes.
Baseline
Baseline iPRGC Activity
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline iPRGC activity (cells in the back of the eye as measured by blue light-driven inputs to the pupil response - measured by the blue decay coefficient). The Blue Decay Coefficient represents the rate at which the pupil redilates in the dark after exposure to multiple 5-second pulses of red and blue light. The redilation data are fit by an exponential decay function eβt where t is time in seconds and the coefficient β is the natural log of the percent change in pupil diameter per second. Values range from -0.30 to -0.01. More positive values represent slower pupil redilation and are associated with greater, potentially beneficial ipRGC activity.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accommodative Amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline
Testing the hypothesis that long-term soft bifocal contact lens wear does not alter accommodative amplitude. This hypothesis predicts that at the baseline BLINK2 Study visit, the accommodative amplitude will be similar across the three treatment groups that were randomly assigned at the beginning of the BLINK Study (NCT02255474). Assessed data from the beginning of the BLINK Study up to the BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit approximately 4.7 years, BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit reported
Baseline
Lag of Accommodation
Time Frame: Baseline
Testing the hypothesis that long-term soft bifocal contact lens wear does not alter accommodative lag. This hypothesis predicts that at the baseline BLINK2 Study visit, the accommodative lag will be similar across the three treatment groups that were randomly assigned at the beginning of the BLINK Study (NCT02255474). Assessed data from the beginning of the BLINK Study up to the BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit approximately 4.7 years, BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit reported.
Baseline
Accommodative Facility
Time Frame: Baseline
Testing the hypothesis that long-term soft bifocal contact lens wear does not alter accommodative facility. This hypothesis predicts that at the baseline BLINK2 Study visit, the accommodative lag will be similar across the three treatment groups that were randomly assigned at the beginning of the BLINK Study (NCT02255474). Assessed data from the beginning of the BLINK Study up to the BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit approximately 4.7 years, BLINK2 Study Baseline Visit reported.
Baseline
Slowing of Myopia Progression - Axial Length
Time Frame: Two year change (Baseline to 2-Year visit)

Test the hypothesis that wearing +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses slow rather than merely delay myopia progression. This null hypothesis predicts that during the first two years of the BLINK2 Study, when all subjects will wear +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses, axial length elongation at the same rate regardless of original lens assignment (i.e., +2.50 D multifocal lenses, +1.50 D multifocal lenses, SVLs). Alternatively, faster myopia progression in subjects originally fitted with soft bifocal contact lenses compared to single vision contact lenses would indicate a delay in myopia progression rather than a permanent treatment benefit. Measured as the change the baseline BLINK2 visit to the 2 year visit on the IOLMaster which is not the entire time frame of the study - as detailed in the specific aims from the funded grant proposal.

Because the exposures before the baseline visit were part of NCT02255474 immediately before this cohort, the original groups were analyzed.

Two year change (Baseline to 2-Year visit)
Rebound of Progression - Axial Length
Time Frame: One year change (2-year visit to 3-year visit)

The investigators will test the hypothesis that there is no increase in myopia when switching from +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses to single vision contact lenses in Year 2 of the BLINK2 observational study. This hypothesis predicts that the progression of myopia during the last year of follow-up when all subjects will switch to single vision contact lenses, will be similar to myopia progression during the first two years when all subjects wore multifocal contact lenses. Alternatively, faster progression after switching to single vision contact lens wear indicates a "rebound" of myopia progression.

This aim was specifically designed to measure what happened between the 2nd and 3rd annual visit which is not the entire time frame of the study - as detailed in the specific aims from the funded grant proposal. Because the entire cohort was wearing the same contact lens, it uses all participants together.

One year change (2-year visit to 3-year visit)
Rebound of Progression - Myopia Progression
Time Frame: One year change (2-year visit to 3-year visit)

The investigators will test the hypothesis that there is no increase in myopia, as measured by the change in the spherical equivalent, when switching from +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses to single vision contact lenses in Year 2 of the BLINK2 observational study. This hypothesis predicts that the progression of myopia during the last year of follow-up when all subjects will switch to single vision contact lenses, will be similar to myopia progression during the first two years when all subjects wore multifocal contact lenses. Alternatively, faster progression after switching to single vision contact lens wear indicates a "rebound" of myopia progression.

This aim was specifically designed to measure what happened between the 2nd and 3rd annual visit which is not the entire time frame of the study - as detailed in the specific aims from the funded grant proposal. Because the entire cohort was wearing the same contact lens, it uses all participants together.

One year change (2-year visit to 3-year visit)
Slowing of Myopia Progression - Myopia Progression
Time Frame: Two year change (Baseline visit to 2-year visit)

Test the hypothesis that wearing +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses slow rather than merely delay myopia progression. This null hypothesis predicts that during the first two years of the BLINK2 Study, when all subjects will wear +2.50 D multifocal contact lenses, participants will have myopia progression, as measured by spherical equivalent, at the same rate regardless of original lens assignment (i.e., +2.50 D multifocal lenses, +1.50 D multifocal lenses, SVLs). Alternatively, faster myopia progression in those with soft bifocal contact lenses compared to SVLs would indicate a delay in myopia progression rather than a permanent treatment benefit.

Measured between Baseline and Year 2 of the BLINK2 Study which is not the entire time frame of the study - as detailed in the specific aims from the funded grant proposal.

Because the exposures before the baseline visit were part of NCT02255474 immediately before this cohort, the original groups were analyzed.

Two year change (Baseline visit to 2-year visit)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey J Walline, OD PhD, The Ohio State University College of Optometry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UG1EY023206 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on Contact lenses

Subscribe