Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion

September 13, 2019 updated by: mohammed abd elrehman moselhy, Beni-Suef University

Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Control Study

The Proper position of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) requires confirmation to ensure the adequacy of laryngeal seal and pulmonary ventilation. This confirmation may help in prevention of the peri-operative airway complication and ventilation events associated with LMA placement

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is common practice to inflate the cuff of LMA with the maximum recommended volume (size 3, 20 ml; size 4, 30 ml; size 5, 40 ml), as illustrated in several studies , but it may become more rigid which may cause displacement of the LMA and decreases the airway sealing of LMA, more pressure on pharyngeal mucosa which might cause severe mucosal ischemia leading to post- operative sore throat, dysphagia or hoarseness.

Ultrasonography can reliably confirm correct placement of supraglottic devices like laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and rules out causes of inadequate ventilation , also it was found to be a sensitive in detecting rotational malposition of LMA in children.

the replacement of air with saline in LMA cuffs enable detection of cuffs in the airway allowing visualization of the surrounding structures and tissues as the ultrasound beam can be transmitted through the fluid-filled cuffs without being reflected from air mucosal interface.

the adequacy of LMA position will be confirmed by a fiberoptic laryngoscope (FOL)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

102

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged from 18- 60 years of either sex, ASA physical status I - II, weighting 50-100 kg, who will scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients whom LMA is contraindicated as patients who are at an increased risk of gastric aspiration as (obstetrics, hiatal hernia or esophageal reflux ), patients with high airway resistance e.g. (bronchospasm or pulmonary edema), patients with low pulmonary compliance e.g. (obesity), cases of an inability to open the mouth or an infection or pathologic abnormality within the oral cavity or pharynx and nonsupine position of operation .
  • Patients with a known or predicted difficult airway as patients with class III and IV Modified Mallampati Score or with score > 5 wilson's risk score.
  • Patients with cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease), history of renal or hepatic insufficiency, and endocrinal Diseases will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1st group (group B)

The LMA LarySeal Multiple will be inserted using the blind technique which involves holding the LMA like a pen guided into the pharynx with the index finger of the operator at the junction of the tube and the bowl, with the operator at the head of the patient and the LMA facing caudally.

The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading devised by Aoyama et al.

-The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading licensed by Aoyama et al.
Active Comparator: 2nd group:(group U)

The LMA LarySeal Multiple will be inserted under the guide of B-mode US on the anterior neck . Transverse scans , Sagittal view and Parasagittal view.

-The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading devised by Aoyama et al.

-The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading licensed by Aoyama et al.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the Score of the fibreoptic view of the larynx
Time Frame: from the clinical judgement of correct position (as ventilation without substantial leak at an airway pressure ≤20 cm H2O, observation of EtCO2 trace )up to 120 second
the aim of this study is to compare between the blind technique and US guided technique of laryngeal mask airway insertion regarding the position as confirmed by the fiberoptic laryngoscope.
from the clinical judgement of correct position (as ventilation without substantial leak at an airway pressure ≤20 cm H2O, observation of EtCO2 trace )up to 120 second

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: mohammed abd moselhy, MD, lecturer in anesthesia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Beni-suef Hospital

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on the Position of Laryngeal Mask Airway

Clinical Trials on the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) for confirmation of LMA position

Subscribe