Bladder Irrigation 0.05% Lidocaine Decreases Postoperative CRBD

February 18, 2020 updated by: Chia-Heng Lin, MD, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

Bladder Irrigation With 0.05% Lidocaine Normal Saline Solution for Prevent Postoperative Catheter Related Bladder Discomfort (CRBD) Under ANI Monition After Transurethal Surgery

Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) secondary to an indwelling urinary catheter is very distressing, and it may get worse in patients undergoing transurethral surgery for damage urethra by a surgical instrument as well as a sizable and urinary catheter placement. Lidocaine, a local anesthetic, showed of analgesic, sedative, and anti-inflammatory effect. Therefore, the investigators prepared a 0.05% lidocaine in normal saline as a bladder irrigation solution after surgery to reduce Catheter-related bladder discomfort.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) secondary to an indwelling urinary catheter is very distressing. It is not unusual that patients who have been catheterized under anesthesia complain of an urge to void in the postoperative period because of catheter-related bladder irritation. Bladder catheterization induces bladder irritation whose symptoms (urge to void and discomfort in the suprapubic region) are similar to the symptoms of an overactive bladder (urinary frequency and urgency with or without urge incontinence), caused by involuntary contractions of the bladder mediated by muscarinic receptors. The discomforts are quickly getting worse in patients undergoing transurethral surgery by a surgical instrument as well as a sizable urinary catheter placement. Recently, antimuscarinic drugs for treat overactive bladder, such as tolterodine and oxybutynin, have been tried for prevention of CRBD with variable success. However, they may cause side effect including palpitation, dry mouth, drowsiness, dizziness or headache. Lidocaine, a local anesthetic, showed of analgesic, sedative and anti-inflammatory effect. Therefore, the investigators prepared a 0.05% lidocaine in normal saline as a bladder irrigation solution after surgery to reduce Catheter-related bladder discomfort.

Objectives:

The aim of this study were:

  1. to evaluate the efficacy to prevent CRBD with Bladder irrigation with 0.05% Lidocaine normal saline solution
  2. to observe the change of vital sign with Bladder irrigation with 0.05% Lidocaine normal saline solution
  3. to see the side effect of with Bladder irrigation with 0.05% Lidocaine normal saline solution

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Kuang-I Cheng, MD, PhD.
  • Phone Number: 7035 88673121101
  • Email: kuaich@kmu.edu.tw

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Recruiting
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who received regular transurethral surgery were inserted left foley catheter for urine drainage or bladder irrigation.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)class:Ι-Ⅲ
  • Age:20-70years
  • Sex:Male

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lidocaine allergy
  • cardiac conduction with partial or total block
  • patient with progressive hepatic or renal impairment
  • patient with class III anti-arrhythmia agent(ex:amiodarone)
  • patient with acute porphyria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Control group: using normal saline for bladder irrigation
Experimental: Study group
Study group: using 0.05% Lidocaine normal saline solution for bladder irrigation
0.05% lidocaine with normal saline as a bladder irrigation solution after transurethral surgery intravenous pethidine to decrease CRBD if needed
Other Names:
  • intravenous pethidine 0.25 mg/kg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
using Numerical rating scale to measure pain alleviate
Time Frame: 6 hours
measurement of numerical pain rating scale from 0 (no pain): no pain to 10 (severe pain intolerable) as maintain the score of analgesia nociception index within 50-70 ( over 70 may need to evaluate analgesia overdose and under 50 to evaluate pain or hemodynamic changes)
6 hours
using catheter-related bladder discomfort score to evaluate CRBD alleviation
Time Frame: 6 hours
measurement of catheter-related bladder discomfort score (grade 1: none, grade II: mild, grade III: moderate, grade IV: severe
6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
using the sphygmomanometer to monitor blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 hours
monitoring fluctuate systolic, diastolic blood pressure(unit: mmHg)
6 hours
checking the heart rate of patient by the pulse oximeter
Time Frame: 6 hours
checking the heart rate(unit: the heart beats per minute) by the pulse oximeter
6 hours
monitoring the hemodynamic changes by using the analgesia nociception index(ANI)
Time Frame: 6 hours
maintain the score of analgesia nociception index within 50-70 ( over 70 may need to evaluate analgesia overdose and under 50 to evaluate pain or hemodynamic changes) and observe the changes under the situation of discomfort and pain
6 hours
checking the physiological response, vomiting or not
Time Frame: 6 hours
checking vomiting or not
6 hours
measure the physiological response to the hypothermia of patient
Time Frame: 6 hours
measure if the temperature below 35.0°C so called the hypothermia(unit: °C) of patient by the thermometer
6 hours
measuring the amount of oxygen in the blood
Time Frame: 6 hours
check SaO2(arterial oxygen saturation) by the pulse oximeter(unit: %), a small beams of light pass through the blood in the finger, measuring the amount of oxygen, should maintain in 90%-100%
6 hours
assess the electrolyte imbalance by checking the content of Na
Time Frame: 6 hours
assess the electrolyte imbalance, maintain Na(unit: mmol/L) in 135-145, by 2 to 5 ml of blood testing
6 hours
assess the electrolyte imbalance by checking the content of K
Time Frame: 6 hours
assess the electrolyte imbalance, maintain K(unit: mmol/L) in 3.5-5.1, by 2 to 5 ml of blood testing
6 hours
assess the electrolyte imbalance by checking the content of Ca++
Time Frame: 6 hours
assess the electrolyte imbalance, maintain Ca++(unit: mg/dL) in 4.6~5.32, by 2 to 5 ml of blood testing
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chia-heng Lin, MD, Kaohsiung Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Discomfort

Clinical Trials on 0.05% Lidocaine

3
Subscribe