Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT): Phase Two (ANGEL-ACT II)

November 10, 2019 updated by: Zhongrong Miao, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Work Flow Improvement in Pre-procedural Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke With Endovascular Treatment: a Multi-centre, Cluster Randomised, Open Label, Parallel Controlled Study

The study is the second phase of Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT).

During the first phase of the ANGEL-ACT (NCT03370939, a prospective multi-center registry study), problems and difficulties in the emergency work flow of acute ischemic stroke care in China have been identified, such as inadequate pre-hospital notification, delay of in-hospital diagnosis and treatment, difficulty in treatment consent, lack of professional training of endovascular treatment,etc., especially in the delay of in-hospital diagnosis and treatment.

ANGEL-ACT II is a cluster randomized, parallel controlled study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-modal medical quality improvement measures on the delay of hospital-level emergency work flow of acute ischemic stroke management as well as its impact on patient prognosis. The interventional measures include emergency work flow management app on smartphone, specialized training, assessment of quality improvement outcomes and feedback on a regular basis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multi-centre, cluster randomized, open label, parallel controlled study that enrolled patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular treatment in about 34 hospitals in China. The ratio Interventional arm control arm is 1:1, which means 17 hospitals and 332 participants in each arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

664

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100010
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing TianTan Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Investigational Sites Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participated in the ANGEL-ACT registry study
  • Secondary or tertiary hospitals
  • Available of emergency department and neurology ward for stroke patients
  • Must have 24 hours × 7 days emergency department for stroke
  • Capable of rt-PA thrombolysis and endovascular treatment

Investigational Sites Exclusion Criteria

  • Endovascular treatment volume < 20 per year
  • Unwillingness to participate ANGEL-ACT II and follow the protocol
  • Currently participating other stroke treatment improving program/project or similar clinical studies

Participant Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Admitted from emergency or outpatient department;
  • Acue ischemic stroke with large artery occlusion
  • Within 24 hours after the onset, and eligible for endovascular treatment.
  • The patient or legal representative give written informed consent

Participant Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unsuitable for this study investigators' discretion
  • Progressive stroke or in-hospital stroke

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Interventional Site

The process below will be allocated in Interventional Sites:

  1. At each interventional sites, implementing full assessment of current emergency work flow of acute ischemic stroke patients who eligible for endovascular treatment. All interventional sites would undergo assessment in order to form a baseline.
  2. Drafting intervention approaches based on the assessment results of all interventional sites. These approaches are executable, reproducible, and measurable.
  3. Emergency work flow management APP would be installed on smartphones of designated personnel at each interventional sites.
  4. Both intervention approaches and APP would be incorporated with original work flow at each interventional site.
  5. Training sessions would be held in interventional sites or online every 3 month once the patient enrolment begin.
  6. Outcome data would be analysed and dispatched every 3 month for each interventional sites.
The interventional measures include emergency work flow management app on smartphone, specialized training, assessment of quality improvement outcomes and feedback on a regular basis, patient-centred management frame based lean six-sigma, and other specialised approach.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control Site
The control site would not undergo any emergency work flow modification for acute ischemic stroke patients who eligible for endovascular treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of reaching the standard arrival-to-groin Puncture time
Time Frame: From the time of arrival at the emergency department until the time of successful groin puncture, assessed up to 12 hours
The percentage of reaching the guideline recommended time target for acute ischemic stroke patients who eligible for endovascular treatment.
From the time of arrival at the emergency department until the time of successful groin puncture, assessed up to 12 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from arrival to groin puncture
Time Frame: From the time of arrival at the emergency department until the time of successful groin puncture, assessed up to 12 hours
Minutes
From the time of arrival at the emergency department until the time of successful groin puncture, assessed up to 12 hours
Time from arrival to imaging
Time Frame: From the time of arrival at the emergency department until the time of brain imaging, assessed up to 12 hours
Minutes
From the time of arrival at the emergency department until the time of brain imaging, assessed up to 12 hours
Time from imaging to groin puncture
Time Frame: From the time of brain imaging until the time of successful groin puncture, assessed up to 12 hours
Minutes
From the time of brain imaging until the time of successful groin puncture, assessed up to 12 hours
Time from groin puncture to recanalization
Time Frame: From the time of successful groin puncture until the time of the recanalization of the occluded artery, assessed up to 4 hours
Minutes
From the time of successful groin puncture until the time of the recanalization of the occluded artery, assessed up to 4 hours
Time from arrival to recanalization
Time Frame: From the time of arrival at the emergency department until the time of the recanalization of the occluded artery, assessed up to 48 hours
Minutes
From the time of arrival at the emergency department until the time of the recanalization of the occluded artery, assessed up to 48 hours
Time from symptom onset to recanalization
Time Frame: From the time of symptom onset until the time of of the recanalization of the occluded artery, assessed up to 48 hours
Minutes
From the time of symptom onset until the time of of the recanalization of the occluded artery, assessed up to 48 hours
Recanalization rate immediately after the procedure
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure
modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b-3
Immediately after the procedure
Recanalization rate 24 hours after the procedure
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure
Recanalization was defined as a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI ) score of 2- 3.
24 hours after the procedure
Modified Rankin Scale independence rate within 90 days after the procedure
Time Frame: 90 days after enrolment
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. (Score Description: 0---No symptoms at all. 1---No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities. 2---Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance. 3---Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance. 4--- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance. 5---Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention. 6---Dead. In clinical practice, mRS ≤ 2 means good outcome. Modified Rankin Scale independence rate refers to the percentage of participants with mRS less than 3 after treatment.
90 days after enrolment
EQ-5D-3L 90 days after the procedure
Time Frame: 90 days after the procedure
The EQ-5D-3L essentially consists of two pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions, each describing a different aspect of health: MOBILITY, SELF-CARE, USUAL ACTIVITIES, PAIN / DISCOMFORT and ANXIETY / DEPRESSION. Each dimension has three levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems (labelled 1-3). The respondent is asked to indicate his / her health state by checking the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical VAS where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine'( score as 100) and 'The worst health you can imagine' (score as 0). This information can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual respondents.
90 days after the procedure
Rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 24 hours after the procedure
Time Frame: 24 hours within the procedure ended
24 hours within the procedure ended
Rate of complications related to the procedure
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure
24 hours after the procedure
Rate of all cause mortality within 90 days after the procedure
Time Frame: 90 days after enrolment
90 days after enrolment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 22, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracranial Artery Occlusion With Infarction (Disorder)

Clinical Trials on ANGEL Intervention Package and Toolbox

3
Subscribe