iParent2Parent Program for Parents of Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (iPa2PaJIA)

April 1, 2021 updated by: Sara Ahola Kohut, The Hospital for Sick Children

The iParent2Parent Program: Peer Mentoring for Parents of Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

The iParent2Parent program matches parents of children living with arthritis with a trained parent mentor who will provide parents of children newly diagnosed with arthritis: practical coping advice and social support through shared lived experiences. This study will compare two groups of parents: those who are in the iParent2Parent program and those in the control group (no mentor).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Parents/primary caregiver of children with JIA are an often overlooked but essential member of their child's health care team. They are responsible for managing their child's treatment program, and act as advocates for their child to support positive adaptation to JIA and to learn self-management skills for the disease. This is in the context of managing the financial, logistical, emotional, and social demands of parenting in general. Within pediatric tertiary care centres, peer-support programs for parents of children with JIA are often limited or difficult to access. The iParent2Parent Program aims to fill this gap in services by offering a program of trained parent peer mentors who can provide practical coping advice, foster adaptive problem solving, and provide social support via shared lived experience.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3K 6R8
        • The IWK Health Centre
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital for Sick Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking caregiver of a child diagnosed with JIA according to ILAR criteria prior to their 18th birthday
  • Access to computer capable of using free Skype software

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive impairment or major co-morbid illness of parent that impeded ability to engage in program (e.g.; psychosis, active suicidal ideation, cognitive delays that would impact ability to participate and complete questionnaires.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental: iParent2Parent Mentorship
10 sessions of 20-30 minute Skype video calls conducted over 2 to 3 months
In addition to standard care, parents in the experimental group will receive the iParent2Parent program. The iParent2Parent program is a tailored peer mentorship program that provides modeling and reinforcement by peers (trained parents of children with JIA) to parents of children diagnosed with JIA.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Waitlist Control Group
The control group will receive standard care but without the iParent2Parent program
The control group will receive standard care but without the iParent2Parent program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trial feasibility of iParent2Parent program
Time Frame: At study completion; an average of 2 years
Criteria for feasibility are based on studies previously conducted by our group and will be: accrual rate of >70 percent, attrition rate of <15percent, technical difficulties reported by <10 percent of parents and mentors, adherence rate of >80 percent, <5 percent missed responses on outcome measures and high acceptability (based on qualitative analyses). Data related to the primary outcome will be recorded on investigator-developed forms.
At study completion; an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS Adult Profile 25
Time Frame: baseline; up to 12 weeks after baseline, 6 months post program
29 item collection of short forms from 7 health domains: depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The scale is scored from 1 to 5. The higher the score the worse the outcome
baseline; up to 12 weeks after baseline, 6 months post program
Short form version of the PROMIS
Time Frame: baseline; up to 12 weeks after baseline, 6 months post program
Short form version of the PROMIS battery for Social Isolation; Informational support; and Emotional support. The scale is scored from 1 to 5. The higher the score the better the outcome (emotional and informational support). The higher the score the worse the outcome for social isolation)
baseline; up to 12 weeks after baseline, 6 months post program
Coping Health Inventory for Parents
Time Frame: baseline; up to 12 weeks after baseline, 6 months post program
45-item measure of a parent's response to managing demands when a child has a serious or chronic medical condition. The lower the score, the worse the outcome. Minimum value 0 and maximum value 3.
baseline; up to 12 weeks after baseline, 6 months post program
Parental Stress Scale
Time Frame: baseline; up to 12 weeks after baseline, 6 months post program
Attempts to measure the levels of stress experienced by parents. The scale is scored from 1 to 5. The lower the score the lower the level of stress and the higher the score the higher the level of stress.
baseline; up to 12 weeks after baseline, 6 months post program

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 15, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 16, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on JIA

Clinical Trials on iParent2Parent Program

3
Subscribe