Effect of Local Pressure on Muscle Activity and General Relaxation in Persons With Hypertonia Following Stroke

November 25, 2021 updated by: University Ghent

Effect of Local Pressure Application on Muscle Activity and General Relaxation in Persons With Hypertonia Following Stroke

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of - both constant as intermittent - local application of deep pressure on muscle activity and general relaxation in persons with hypertonia following stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will be carried out in 20 persons with hypertonia following stroke. There will be one single test occasion, during which 6 test trials will be performed in random order. Deep pressure will be applied by means of a Johnstone air splint, that will be (1) not inflated, (2) inflated constantly, or (3) inflated intermittently. Each of these 3 inflation conditions will be performed twice, i.e. with and without a non-hemiplegic arm movement (triggering hypertonia at hemiplegic side).

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium
        • Ghent University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subacute stroke (<6 months)
  • hypertonia (Modified Ashworth Scale score of ≥2 for arm flexors at the hemiplegic side)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: uninflated - rest
splint around the arm is not inflated both arms are in rest during the entire trial
no deep pressure applied by the air splint
Sham Comparator: uninflated - triggered
splint around the arm is not inflated 5x flexion and extension with the contralateral arm (with weight of 5kg in the hands)
no deep pressure applied by the air splint
non-hemiplegic arm is flexed and extended 5 times, with a weight of 5kg in the hand, in order to trigger hypertonia in the hemiplegic arm
Active Comparator: constantly inflated - rest
splint around the arm is constantly inflated both arms are in rest during the entire trial
inflation of the Johnstone air splint gives a constant local deep pression on the hemiplegic arm
Active Comparator: constantly inflated - triggered
splint around the arm is constantly inflated 5x flexion and extension with the contralateral arm (with weight of 5kg in the hands)
non-hemiplegic arm is flexed and extended 5 times, with a weight of 5kg in the hand, in order to trigger hypertonia in the hemiplegic arm
inflation of the Johnstone air splint gives a constant local deep pression on the hemiplegic arm
Experimental: intermittently inflated - rest
splint around the arm is intermittently inflated both arms are in rest during the entire trial
continuous inflation and deflation of the Johnstone air splint gives an intermittent local deep pression on the hemiplegic arm
Experimental: intermittently inflated - triggered
splint around the arm is intermittently inflated 5x flexion and extension with the contralateral arm (with weight of 5kg in the hands)
non-hemiplegic arm is flexed and extended 5 times, with a weight of 5kg in the hand, in order to trigger hypertonia in the hemiplegic arm
continuous inflation and deflation of the Johnstone air splint gives an intermittent local deep pression on the hemiplegic arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EMG of biceps brachii
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
electromyographic frequency analysis of biceps brachii muscle activity at the hemiplegic side
through study completion, an average of 5 months
EMG of triceps brachii
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
electromyographic frequency analysis of triceps brachii muscle activity at the hemiplegic side
through study completion, an average of 5 months
EMG of pectoralis major
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
electromyographic frequency analysis of pectoralis major muscle activity at the hemiplegic side
through study completion, an average of 5 months
MyotonPRO measurement of pectoralis major muscle tone
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
MyotonPRO measurement of pectoralis major muscle tone
through study completion, an average of 5 months
heart rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
heart rate measurement assessed with the Zehpyr bioharness
through study completion, an average of 5 months
heart rate variability
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
heart rate variability assessed with the Zehpyr bioharness
through study completion, an average of 5 months
respiratory rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
respiratory rate assessed with the Zehpyr bioharness
through study completion, an average of 5 months
subjective rating of hypertonia
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
visual analogue scale rating of the intensity of hypertonia, in which the degree of hypertonia has to be situated between "0" (no hypertonia) and "10" (very severe hypertonia)
through study completion, an average of 5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MyotonPRO measurement of pectoralis major elasticity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
MyotonPRO measurement of pectoralis major elasticity
through study completion, an average of 5 months
MyotonPRO measurement of pectoralis major stiffness
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
MyotonPRO measurement of pectoralis major stiffness
through study completion, an average of 5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on uninflated air splint

Subscribe