Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Hysterectomy

January 10, 2023 updated by: Ai-ris Collier, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Post-Operative Recovery After Cesarean Hysterectomy Using the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway is a well-described evidence-based protocol to optimize patient post-operative recovery. Patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomies are a unique surgical population. These procedures are most commonly performed for patients with placenta accreta spectrum or severe postpartum hemorrhage. In recent studies examining the effectiveness of the ERAS pathway, post-operative cesarean patients experienced decreased average inpatient opioid exposure without an increase in pain scores, early mobilization and nutrition targets without increases in adverse outcomes after program implementation. Post-operative hysterectomy patients with gynecologic indications experienced shorter lengths of stay and decreased opioid consumption. Additionally, patients have significantly higher satisfaction scores. The investigators suspect that this population may also benefit similarly.

This research is a pre- and post- study to assess and describe surgical outcomes and parameters surrounding patients' post-operative recovery and experience before and after the ERAS pathway is implemented at a high volume placenta accreta spectrum Center of Excellence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway has emerged as an evidence-based protocol to optimize patient post-operative recovery. It utilizes multimodal analgesia to decrease narcotic use and promote streamlined patient-centered care that helps to reduce blood loss, expedite patients' return to baseline function, and prepare patient expectations around surgery. This pathway has been well studied in several surgical populations, including gynecologic (post hysterectomy) and obstetric (post cesarean) patients.

Patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomies are a unique surgical population. These procedures are most commonly performed for patients with placenta accreta spectrum or severe postpartum hemorrhage. Ideally, women with suspected placenta accreta spectrum diagnosed antenatally should be delivered at a level III or IV center with placenta accreta spectrum Centers of Excellence accreditation to improve outcomes. With the rates of placenta accreta spectrum increasing, these Centers of Excellence could consider applying principles of the ERAS pathway to the operative management of these patients. Other populations have seen decreases in opioid use, quicker baseline recovery, shorter hospital stays and overall improved patient satisfaction with the use of the ERAS pathway.

In recent studies examining the effectiveness of the ERAS pathway, post-operative cesarean patients experienced decreased average inpatient opioid exposure without an increase in pain scores, early mobilization and nutrition targets without increases in adverse outcomes after program implementation. Post-operative hysterectomy patients with gynecologic indications experienced shorter lengths of stay and decreased opioid consumption. Additionally, patients have significantly higher satisfaction scores. The investigators suspect that this population may also benefit similarly.

This research is a pre- and post- study to assess and describe surgical outcomes and parameters surrounding patients' post-operative recovery and experience before and after the ERAS pathway is implemented at a high volume placenta accreta spectrum Center of Excellence.

The study design involves a retrospective analysis of variables related to postpartum recovery. The primary outcome will be oral morphine equivalents as a proxy for narcotic use in the first 72 hours post-operatively, comparing pre- to post-ERAS implementation. Investigators will also collect data on pain scores, time to ambulation, time to foley catheter removal and first void, and length of stay. Investigators will also collect data on post-operative complications including surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, transfusion, unplanned return to OR, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, unplanned intubation, cardiac arrest, readmission within 30 days, sepsis, and death within 30 days.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Underwent a cesarean hysterectomy at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient records not accessible at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pre-ERAS implementation arm
Post-ERAS implementation arm
ERAS Pathway

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral morphine equivalents
Time Frame: Until study completion, expected 2 years
Oral morphine equivalent use during first 72 hours after surgery
Until study completion, expected 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scores
Time Frame: Until study completion, expected 2 years
Likert scale 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=most pain) during first 72 hours after surgery
Until study completion, expected 2 years
Time to ambulation
Time Frame: Until study completion, expected 2 years
Hours from surgery to first ambulation
Until study completion, expected 2 years
Time to urinary foley removal
Time Frame: Until study completion, expected 2 years
Hours from surgery to foley catheter removal
Until study completion, expected 2 years
Length of stay
Time Frame: Until study completion, expected 2 years
Days of inpatient hospitalization after surgery
Until study completion, expected 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019P000821

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-operative Recovery for Cesarean Hysterectomy Patients

Clinical Trials on ERAS post-operative pathway

Subscribe