- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05879536
The Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Tramadol-ondansetron on Recovery After Caesarean Section. (TRON)
The Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Tramadol-ondansetron on Recovery After Caesarean Section. A Prospective, Observational and Non-inferiority Study Against Epidural Analgesia.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary outcome is to assess the non-inferiority in terms of post-cesarean section recovery of the intravenous perfusion of tramadol + ondansetron compared to the perfusion of local anesthetics through an epidural catheter.
This will be a prospective observational cohort study, with a total N of 312 patients who underwent a cesarean section. 156 who maintain the epidural catheter as the main measure of analgesia for 24 h, and 156 who receive an infusion of tramadol-ondansetron from the end of the cesarean section and for the following 24 h. The following data will be collected at 24 and 48 hours: need for unscheduled pharmacological reinforcement, adverse effects, QoR (Quality of Recovery) score 15, ObsQor-10 (Obstetric Quality of Recovery) score, and Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) every 4 hours for 48 hours. The incidence of chronic pain 90 days after cesarean section will be assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jose Daniel Jimenez Santana, Resident
- Phone Number: +34629826331
- Email: jimenez_josedanielsan@gva.es
Study Locations
-
-
-
Valencia, Spain
- Recruiting
- Hospital Universitario La Fe
-
Contact:
- Jose Daniel Jimenez Santana, Resident
- Phone Number: +34629826331
- Email: jimenez_josedanielsan@gva.es
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Woman over 18 years old undergoing caesarean section
- She agrees to participate voluntarily.
- She is already receiving any of the analgesic strategies studied.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Receiving an analgesic medication other than the one mentioned as "routine multimodal analgesia" (either as regular medication or for acute post-surgical pain)
- Medical history that determines the baseline data of the scales and data that we collect ( pain or previous disabilities; addiction to drugs, alcohol or drugs; another disease that worsens the quality of life)
- Medical history that conditions the pharmacological effect (allergy, intolerance or atypical reaction to any of the drugs involved in its treatment or possible cross-reactions )
- Contraindication for neuraxial techniques (patient refusal, difficulty in understanding or communication, localized infection, increased intracranial pressure, or other medical criteria)
- Two or more previous caesarean sections
- Difficulty in understanding or communication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
TRON (Tramadol-Ondansetron)
Women who receive an infusion of tramadol-ondansetron from the end of the cesarean section and for the following 24 h.
The infusion (TRON) is composed of 300 mg of tramadol and 12 mg of ondansetron dissolved in 250 ml of 0.9% saline, which is routinely programmed at 11 ml/h until the content is exhausted (approximately 23 hours).
|
Analgesia strategy determined by routine use according to protocols, without investigator intervention.
|
AL-EPI (Local anesthetics via epidural)
Women who maintain the epidural catheter as the main measure of analgesia for 24 h.
The epidural catheter after caesarean section is programmed with a 0.2% ropivacaine PCA (Patient controlled analgesia) pump at 7 ml/h with 7 ml on-demand boluses, with block every 20 min.
|
Analgesia strategy determined by routine use according to protocols, without investigator intervention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Post-surgical recovery
Time Frame: Day 1
|
QoR-15 score at 24 hours after cesarean section
|
Day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Analgesia for acute pain
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Pain score evolution on the sequential Visual Analogue Scale at 24 hours, measured every 4 hours.
|
Day 1
|
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Presence or absence of the next adverse effects: Pruritus; tremors; urinary retention or need for a bladder catheter; Constipation or abdominal distension; limitation of mobility; delayed initiation of breastfeeding if desired (due to analgesia); need for blood extraction for control analysis.
|
Day 1
|
External validity of ObsQoR10 - Spanish version
Time Frame: Day 1
|
ObsQor-10 score at 24 hours.
|
Day 1
|
Post-surgical recovery
Time Frame: Day 2
|
QoR-15 score at 48 hours after cesarean section
|
Day 2
|
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Presence or absence of the next adverse effects: Pruritus; tremors; urinary retention or need for a bladder catheter; Constipation or abdominal distension; limitation of mobility; delayed initiation of breastfeeding if desired (due to analgesia); need for blood extraction for control analysis.
|
Day 2
|
Analgesia for acute pain
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Pain score evolution on the sequential Visual Analogue Scale at 48 hours, measured every 4 hours.
|
Day 2
|
Chronic Pain
Time Frame: Day 90
|
Chronic pain measured by numerical rating scale at 90 days of TRON versus AL-EPI.
|
Day 90
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ciechanowicz S, Setty T, Robson E, Sathasivam C, Chazapis M, Dick J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
- Ciechanowicz S, Howle R, Heppolette C, Nakhjavani B, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
- Jayaraj A, Balachander H, Kuppusamy SK, Arusamy S, Rai Y, Siddiqui N. Comparison of meperidine, tramadol and fentanyl for post-spinal shivering prevention during cesarean delivery: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Nov;45(11):2202-2208. doi: 10.1111/jog.14106. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
- Sultan P, Kormendy F, Nishimura S, Carvalho B, Guo N, Papageorgiou C. Comparison of spontaneous versus operative vaginal delivery using Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10): An observational cohort study. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Aug;63:109781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109781. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
- Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):270-300. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935. No abstract available.
- Weibel S, Neubert K, Jelting Y, Meissner W, Wockel A, Roewer N, Kranke P. Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Nov;33(11):853-865. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000535.
- Sultan P, Kamath N, Carvalho B, Bansal P, Elkhateb R, Dougan S, Whittington J, Guo N, El-Sayed Y, Mhyre J, Sharawi N. Evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 patient-reported outcome measure: a single-center observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100202. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
- Myles PS, Boney O, Botti M, Cyna AM, Gan TJ, Jensen MP, Kehlet H, Kurz A, De Oliveira GS Jr, Peyton P, Sessler DI, Tramer MR, Wu CL; StEP-COMPAC Group; Myles P, Grocott M, Biccard B, Blazeby J, Boney O, Chan M, Diouf E, Fleisher L, Kalkman C, Kurz A, Moonesinghe R, Wijeysundera D. Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):705-711. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
- Moonesinghe SR, Jackson AIR, Boney O, Stevenson N, Chan MTV, Cook TM, Lane-Fall M, Kalkman C, Neuman MD, Nilsson U, Shulman M, Myles PS; Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine-Core Outcome Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) Group. Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative: patient-centred outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):664-670. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.07.020. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
- Boney O, Moonesinghe SR, Myles PS, Grocott MPW; StEP-COMPAC group. Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (COMPAC): a modified Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for trials in perioperative care and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):174-185. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.027. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
- Ma J, Martin R, Chan B, Gofeld M, Geary MP, Laffey JG, Abdallah FW. Using Activity Trackers to Quantify Postpartum Ambulation: A Prospective Observational Study of Ambulation after Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia Interventions. Anesthesiology. 2018 Mar;128(3):598-608. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001979.
- Delfino E, Netto R, Zanon D. Pain control after cesarean delivery: a new proposal for a continuous locoregional technique. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021 Nov;48:103196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103196. Epub 2021 Jun 23. No abstract available.
- Vercauteren M, Vereecken K, La Malfa M, Coppejans H, Adriaensen H. Cost-effectiveness of analgesia after Caesarean section. A comparison of intrathecal morphine and epidural PCA. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Jan;46(1):85-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460115.x.
- Chi X, Li M, Mei W, Liao M. Comparison of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil versus tramadol in post-cesarean section pain management and lactation after general anesthesia - a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study. J Pain Res. 2017 Jul 3;10:1521-1527. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S137799. eCollection 2017.
- Duan G, Bao X, Yang G, Peng J, Wu Z, Zhao P, Zuo Z, Li H. Patient-controlled intravenous tramadol versus patient-controlled intravenous hydromorphone for analgesia after secondary cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial to compare analgesic, anti-anxiety and anti-depression effects. J Pain Res. 2018 Dec 18;12:49-59. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S184782. eCollection 2019.
- Siddik-Sayyid S, Aouad-Maroun M, Sleiman D, Sfeir M, Baraka A. Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain after Cesarean section. Can J Anaesth. 1999 Aug;46(8):731-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03013907.
- Nnacheta TE, Onyekwulu FA, Amucheazi AO. Prevention of postanesthetic shivering under subarachnoid block for cesarean section: A randomized, controlled study comparing tramadol versus ondansetron. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 May;23(5):619-625. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_641_18.
- Sammour RN, Ohel G, Cohen M, Gonen R. Oral naproxen versus oral tramadol for analgesia after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 May;113(2):144-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.024.
- Sahmeddini MA, Azemati S, Motlagh EM. Local Infiltration of Tramadol versus Bupivacaine for Post Cesarean Section Pain Control: A Double-Blind Randomized Study. Iran J Med Sci. 2017 May;42(3):235-241.
- Mitra S, Khandelwal P, Sehgal A. Diclofenac-tramadol vs. diclofenac-acetaminophen combinations for pain relief after caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):706-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02663.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
- Wu Z, Zhao P, Peng J, Fang L, Ding J, Yan G, Wang Y, Zhu J, Wang D, Li Y, Chen Z, Zhang Q, Deng Q, Duan G, Zuo Z, Li H. A Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia With Tramadol Ameliorates Postpartum Depression in High-Risk Woman After Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 27;8:679159. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.679159. eCollection 2021.
- Johansen A, Schirmer H, Nielsen CS, Stubhaug A. Persistent post-surgical pain and signs of nerve injury: the Tromso Study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Mar;60(3):380-92. doi: 10.1111/aas.12653. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
- Richez B, Ouchchane L, Guttmann A, Mirault F, Bonnin M, Noudem Y, Cognet V, Dalmas AF, Brisebrat L, Andant N, Soule-Sonneville S, Dubray C, Duale C, Schoeffler P. The Role of Psychological Factors in Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery. J Pain. 2015 Nov;16(11):1136-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
- Borges NC, de Deus JM, Guimaraes RA, Conde DM, Bachion MM, de Moura LA, Pereira LV. The incidence of chronic pain following Cesarean section and associated risk factors: A cohort of women followed up for three months. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 4;15(9):e0238634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238634. eCollection 2020.
- Lavand'homme P. Postpartum chronic pain. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Mar;85(3):320-324. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.13060-4. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
- Morales-Ariza V, Loaiza-Aldean Y, de Miguel M, Pena-Navarro M, Martinez-Silva O, Gonzalez-Tallada A, Manrique-Munoz S, de Nadal M. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the postoperative quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15) questionnaire for Spanish-speaking patients: A prospective cohort study. Am J Surg. 2023 Apr;225(4):740-747. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
- Mathias LAST, Carlos RV, Siaulys MM, Gabriades P, Guo N, Domingue B, O'Carroll J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Development and validation of a Portuguese version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese). Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022 Jun;41(3):101085. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101085. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
- Kozanhan B, Yildiz M, Polat A, Gunenc O, Tutar SM, Iyisoy MS, Kulhan NG, Sultan P. Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Oct;50(5):366-372. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Postoperative Complications
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Pain, Postoperative
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Antiemetics
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Dermatologic Agents
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Serotonin Agents
- Serotonin Antagonists
- Anesthetics, Local
- Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
- Antipruritics
- Ropivacaine
- Tramadol
- Ondansetron
Other Study ID Numbers
- TRON
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research...CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
Ataturk UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Dehiscence | Cesarean Section, Repeated | Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness | Cesarean, Residual Myometrial ThicknessTurkey
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Odense University HospitalHvidovre University Hospital; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; University of Southern Denmark and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence | Complications; Cesarean Section | Infection; Cesarean Section | Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence | Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean SectionDenmark
-
Tri-Service General HospitalRecruitingCesarean SectionTaiwan
-
Sygehus LillebaeltCompletedCesarean SectionDenmark
-
Aljazeera HospitalCairo UniversityCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Completed
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedCesarean SectionKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on Tramadol-ondansetron continuous infusion
-
Mongi Slim HospitalCompletedEpidural; AnalgesiaTunisia
-
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.ACompletedKidney Diseases | Ischemia-Reperfusion InjuryUnited States, France, Italy, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario San IgnacioWithdrawnCritical Illness | Enteral Feeding Intolerance | Nutrition SupportColombia
-
University of Sao PauloUnknownSepsis | Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections | NephrotoxicityBrazil
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedBreast Cancer | Mastectomy | Paravertebral Catheter InsertionUnited States
-
The George InstituteNational Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; Australian and New...CompletedSepsisBelgium, Australia, United Kingdom, New Zealand, France, Malaysia, Sweden
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterWithdrawnSurgical Site Infections
-
University of VirginiaThe University of QueenslandCompletedPlasma Concentration of AntibioticsUnited States
-
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El...Texas Tech University Health Sciences CenterTerminatedAnalgesia in Total Knee ArthroplastyUnited States
-
The AlfredUnknown