- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04205721
Impact Evaluation of a School-Based Sexuality and HIV Prevention Education Activity in South Africa
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This evaluation focuses on the HIV and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) content of the Government of South Africa life orientation (LO) Curriculum. In 2010, the Department of Basic Education (DBE) undertook assessments of their LO program and learned that while young people who participated in the program had improved knowledge and attitudes, the program was not being implemented uniformly, such that the results were inconsistent across schools and learners. To address these concerns, DBE, with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), developed scripted lesson plans (SLP) to strengthen the SRH content and standardize implementation across schools; these SLP were paired with supporting activities to address fidelity in the curriculum's delivery. The SLP were integrated in the LO program, with most of the lessons offered in the first half of the school year. The lessons were developed for grades 4-6, 7-9, and 10-12. This evaluation focuses on the curricula for grades 7-9 and 10-12. There are eight lessons for grade 7, eight for grade 8, 11 for grade 9, and 10 for grade 10. Notably, there were delays in getting DBE approvals for release of the grade-10 curriculum.
A key component of the program is that all LO teachers are trained on the new materials prior to implementation. Since 2015, USAID/PEPFAR has provided technical support to DBE for program roll out in priority provinces and districts that have the highest HIV incidence and prevalence. Technical support includes educator training on the new SLP and considerations of approaches for scale-up beyond the initial districts. Support for the first phase of implementation and testing was led by Education Development Center, with funding from USAID.
The goal of the proposed impact evaluation is to assess the impact of the LO program on students over time. The primary evaluation question is: What is the effect of the scripted lesson plans and supporting activities on the incidence of HSV-2 or pregnancy after two years among a cohort of girls enrolled in grade 8 at intervention schools compared to a cohort of girls in grade 8 at control schools providing the current life skills program (i.e., the standard of practice)?
The secondary evaluation questions include:
- What is the effect of the scripted lesson plans and supporting activities on knowledge, attitudes, school retention, and self-reported risk behavior, HIV testing, and completed referrals for health services at the end of 8th, 9th, and 10th grade among a cohort of girls first interviewed in grade 8 and among a cross-section girls and boys interviewed in grade 8, grade 9 and grade 10?
- If there is a reduction in the primary outcome, does the intervention work by increasing school retention, or is the effect independent of school retention?
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cape Town, South Africa
- Darryn Durno
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
For the main cohort sample - females in grade 8 were enrolled in 2016 and followed for two years. All participating girls had to
- receive parental consent,
- provide assent, and
- give contact information for study linking.
For the cross-sectional samples, female and male learners in grade 8 in 2016; in grade 9 in 2017 and in grade 10 in 2018 were eligible to participate assuming
- they had parental consent and
- assented to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Must understand one of the five languages that the survey was administered in.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Scripted lesson plan life orientation curriculum
Participants in this arm were in schools where the life orientation teachers in grades 7-9 (in 2016 and 2017) and grade 10 in 2018 were trained to use the new life orientation curriculum that included scripted lesson plans for the sexual and reproductive health content of the program.
There are eight lessons for grade 7, eight for grade 8, 11 for grade 9, and 10 for grade 10.
|
The revised life orientation content and implementation approach were designed to address gaps in prior implementation of the sexuality and HIV education content.
By using scripted lesson plans and training teachers to use these, it was thought that students would get better information and lessons on the material important for HIV prevention.
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard life orientation curriculum
Participants in this arm were in schools where the standard life orientation curriculum was used with no additional training and no use of the new materials.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in HSV-2 experience (Incidence of HSV-2)
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 month follow-up
|
Numerator: number of girls in the longitudinal cohort that test positive for genital herpes (HSV-2); Denominator: all cohort girls who did not have HSV-2 at baseline HSV-2 is measured using biomarkers.
Dried blood spots were collected at baseline and again and endline.
The baseline dried blood spots were stored in freezers until after analysis of the endline dried blood spots.
Those who tested positive for genital herpes at endline were tested at baseline to determine if it was a new (incident) infection or if the girl already had genital herpes at baseline.
The incidence measure is a change from her earlier status.
|
Baseline and 24 month follow-up
|
Change in pregnancy experience (Pregnancy incidence)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
The percentage of girls in the longitudinal cohort who were never pregnant at baseline and who experience a pregnancy (self-reported) by endline.
This is measuring a change in her experience with a pregnancy (incidence).
|
Baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Change in HSV-2 or pregnancy experience (combined outcome)
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 month follow-up
|
Percentage of girls in the longitudinal cohort who experience either incident HSV-2 infection or a pregnancy since baseline.
This is measuring a change her her status.
|
Baseline and 24 month follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Knowledge of HIV risk score
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Eight items were measured at each survey round to determine young people's knowledge of how HIV spreads.
Each question was posed as a "True," "False," or "Don't know" option.
Correct responses were coded one and incorrect or don't know responses were coded zero.
Correct responses were summed so that a higher knowledge score indicates greater knowledge about HIV risk.
|
Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Gender norm attitudes (based on the Gender Equitable Men Scale)
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
This was measured at each survey round using 17 items that were designed based on the Gender Equitable Men Scale, with additional items added.
All questions were asked on a scale of "Agree a lot" to "Do not agree at all."
These were coded as Agree a lot=1 to Do not agree at all =3.
All were recoded so that higher values represent more equitable attitudes.
We sum up the 17 items so that the summed scale equates to higher values being more equitable attitudes.
|
Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Percentage of learners who were tested for HIV in the last 12 months
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
This was measured at each survey round by asking participants to self report if they visited a facility for an HIV test in the last 12 months.
This is used to examine participants experience with HIV testing and if there are changes over time across the study groups.
|
Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
HIV prevalence
Time Frame: 24 month follow-up period only
|
Using dried blood spots collected in the female cross-sectional sample at endline as well as the female cohort, the investigators are able to measure the prevalence of HIV at endline.
This was an outcome that was added in the course of the study and was not part of the original protocol.
|
24 month follow-up period only
|
Self-reported sexual experience - percentage
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Measured by self-reported sexual initiation (age of sexual initiation)
|
Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Self-reported number of sexual partners, among sexually experienced - percentage
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Measured by self-reported number of sexual partners in the last year.
This will be categorized once the distribution is examined.
|
Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Self-reported condom use, among sexually experienced - percentage
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Measured by percentage of learners who self-report that they used a condom at last sex.
|
Collected at baseline, 12 month and 24 month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ilene Speizer, PhD, University Of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Speizer IS, Mandal M, Xiong K, Hattori A, Makina-Zimalirana N, Kumalo F, Taylor S, Ndlovu MS, Madibane M, Beke A. Methodology and Baseline Results From the Evaluation of a Sexuality Education Activity in Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. AIDS Educ Prev. 2018 Apr;30(2):152-168. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2018.30.2.152.
- Speizer IS, Xiong K, Mandal M, Makina-Zimalirana N, Hattori A, Durno D. HIV-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors among Grade 10 Girls and Boys in Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal: Cross-Sectional Results. Open AIDS J. 2020;14:75-83. doi: 10.2174/1874613602014010075. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
- Speizer IS, Mandal M, Xiong K, Makina N, Hattori A, Durno D. Impact evaluation of scripted lesson plans for HIV-related content in a life orientation curriculum: results from two provinces in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):1542. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09640-2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15-3217
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Study Data/Documents
-
Individual Participant Data Set
Information comments: Search for South Africa Impact Evaluation
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV Infections
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of Southern California; California... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedHIV Infections | HIV SeronegativityUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Erasmus Medical CenterCompletedHIV/AIDS | Opportunistic Infections, HIV RelatedNetherlands
-
Gérond'ifRecruiting
-
University of California, DavisCompleted
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedHIV PositiveUnited States
-
University of ChicagoUniversity of Athens; National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.Completed
-
HIV Prevention Trials NetworkNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institute of Allergy and...CompletedHIV PositiveIndonesia, Ukraine, Vietnam
-
University of ZimbabweCompleted
Clinical Trials on School-based sexuality and HIV prevention scripted lesson plans
-
Africa Health Research InstituteRecruitingSexually Transmitted Diseases | HIV-1-infectionSouth Africa
-
University of MalayaCompleted
-
Public Health SolutionsCenters for Disease Control and PreventionUnknownHIV InfectionsUnited States
-
University of TorontoThe CIHR Social Research Centre in HIV PreventionCompleted