Comparison of Bladder Filling vs. Non-Filling in Cesarean Hysterectomy for Placenta Percreta

December 23, 2019 updated by: Hatem AbuHashim

Bladder Filling in Cesarean Hysterectomy for Placenta Percreta: A Randomized Trial

The placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) which includes accreta, increta, and percreta represents a significant obstetric challenge. PAS complicates as many as 1 per 500 pregnancies and this risk is increased with prior cesarean deliveries. Antenatal diagnosis of PAS allows for multidisciplinary planning and delivery before the onset of labor and/or vaginal bleeding. This approach has reduced maternal morbidity rates. including less blood loss, fewer transfusion requirements and, intraoperative urinary tract injury as well as improve fetal outcome.

Ultrasound evaluation is the recommended first-line modality for diagnosing PAS. Ultrasound features suggestive of PAS include loss of the normal retroplacental clear zone, attenuation of the uterine-bladder interface, reduced retroplacental myometrial thickness, presence of intraplacental lacunar spaces, and bridging vessels between the placenta and bladder. A systematic review reported that the antenatal diagnosis of PAS significantly lowered the rate of urinary tract injury (from 63% to 39%) during cesarean hysterectomies in these cases.

Unlike other elective cesarean hysterectomies, cesarean hysterectomy with a placenta previa increta/percreta, is more difficult. There is a greater need to both keep a margin from the vascular cervical-placental mass and simultaneously protect the urinary bladder. Case series reported that bladder filling helps the surgeon to more clearly identify the planes of dissection and secure the engorged aberrant vessels, thereby reduces bladder injury. Accordingly, a prospective randomized study in pregnant patients with placenta previa increta/percreta undergoing elective cesarean hysterectomy will be conducted to address this important issue.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 44 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women in their third trimester (35-37 W).
  • Placenta previa accreta spectrum identified by the Ultrasound (low lying anterior or major degree anterior).
  • With at least one prior cesarean section.
  • Elective cesarean hysterectomy.
  • Evidence of gross placental invasion at the time of surgery (FIGO grade 3a.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing conservative treatment.
  • Emergency cesarean hysterectomy.
  • No evidence of gross placental invasion at the time of surgery.
  • Posterior placenta.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Filled-bladder
Bladder filling with 300ml diluted methylene blue.
Urinary bladder filling with 300 ml diluted methylene blue
Active Comparator: non filled-bladder
Pull up the empty (non-filled) urinary bladder using Allis forceps

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of urinary bladder injury
Time Frame: Intra-operative (i.e. during surgery).
Unintentional bladder injury during elective cesarean hysterectomy
Intra-operative (i.e. during surgery).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mostafa Aboelenin, MBBCh, Samnoud General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MS.19.12.939

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Placenta Accreta

Clinical Trials on Filled-bladder

3
Subscribe