Pelvic Ring Fractures: New Analysis Method and Treatment Decision Algorithm (BASSINJO)

April 26, 2023 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Pelvic ring fractures are common and often the result of high energy trauma but also sometimes of lower energy trauma in older patients. A good classification and description of the fracture is essential to the choice of treatment.

The classifications used to describe these fractures are numerous (Tile modified AO, Young and Burgess, Letournel, Rommens) and of a descriptive order more or less depending on the lesion mechanism allowing some to orient the surgical reduction technique. However, none of them helps with the choice of surgical or functional treatment, which is currently based on obvious notions of instability and / or displacement of lesions and, by habit, all different services.

In addition, the complexity of these classifications leads to poor reproducibility of these.

A new method for analyzing unitary lesions has been developed in the Orthopedic Surgery department of the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group with a rating system which determines the indication according to the score.

Teaching this new method of analyzing pelvic ring fractures would simplify decision making between surgical and functional treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients were hospitalized or consulted in the Orthopedic Surgery service of the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group, for the management of a pelvic ring fracture from January 2015 until September 2019.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged> 18 years
  • Patient treated or followed within the Orthopedic Surgery service of the GHPSJ for a pelvic ring fracture
  • complete initial imaging patient record (scanner)
  • French speaking patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patients deprived of their liberty
  • Patients objecting to the use of their data for this research
  • Patient with isolated sacral or acetabular fracture
  • Absence of scanner during the initial assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with pelvic ring fractures
This retrospective study will be carried out on the data of patients who have received treatment or followed for a pelvic ring fracture, in the Orthopedic Surgery department of the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group between January 2015 and September 2019.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
State of play of the decision for surgical sanction of pelvic ring fractures
Time Frame: Day 1
This corresponds to the number of patients for whom surgical decisions have been made.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of the teaching of the new method of analysis on the surgical decision within each group
Time Frame: Day 1
This corresponds to the number of files for which surgical decision-making was modified before and after teaching of the new method of analysis.
Day 1
Reproducibility of this intra and inter-group decision before and after teaching
Time Frame: Day 1
This corresponds to the number of files for which surgical decision-making was modified before and after teaching of the new method of analysis in intra and inter-group.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BASSINJO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Fracture

3
Subscribe