- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04235907
Telerehabilitation Following Ankle Fractures
January 4, 2023 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
Telerehabilitation Following Ankle Fractures: A Pilot Study
Background and Purpose: Ankle fractures represent one of the most common fractures in North America.
Surgical fixation is often required in the presence of dislocation or instability and has been shown to have a high rate of success.
Following surgical fixation, physical therapy is commonly utilized to assist in regaining function.
Advice alone has been shown to be non-inferior to traditional physical therapy for patients post-ankle fracture in two studies.
The results of these studies have yet to be repeated in the US.
It is the intent of this study to investigate the feasibility of a large clinical trial comparing the results of traditional physical therapy and an internet-based telerehabilitation program.
Following surgical repair of ankle fractures, patients will be randomized to traditional rehabilitation or telerehabilitation.
Telerehabilitation may represent an alternative patient option to traditional physical therapy following ankle fracture repair.
The results of this study will inform the design of larger multi-site clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of telerehabilitation for this patient population.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
- Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Bimalleolar or trimalleolar fracture
- Repaired with open reduction internal fixation technique
- Must have access to computer, tablet, or smart phone with internet access
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe soft tissue damage associated with injury
- Physical or mental conditions that will affect patient's ability to participate in independent rehabilitation
- Non-English speaking
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional Physical Therapy
Patients will be given a prescription to see a physical therapist and a paper-based rehabilitation protocol.
Patients will be allowed to receive physical therapy at a location of patients' choosing.
This arm represents the current standard of care.
|
Prescription for physical therapy and a printed list of exercises to complete.
|
|
Active Comparator: Telerehabilitation
Patients will be given access to a website containing instructions with pictures and videos for the exercises patients are to complete as part of patients' rehabilitation.
Patients will not be given a prescription to physical therapy.
Patients in this group will receive weekly calls from a physical therapist during weeks 6-12 post-operatively.
|
Internet-guided rehabilitation with weekly phone calls from a physical therapist.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in self-reported function
Time Frame: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
Measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, a patient-reported function of the lower extremity.
Scores range from 0-80 with lower scores indicating increased impairment levels.
|
At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in self-reported quality of life
Time Frame: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
Measured using the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey.
This is a 12-Item global health questionnaire with a physical and mental component scores.
Utilizes a t-score method standardized to the US population.
Positive t-scores indicate better than average quality of life and negative t-score values represent lower than average quality of life.
|
At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change in pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory short form
Time Frame: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
Measured using the Brief Pain Inventory short form.
This is a 15-item questionnaire resulting in scores for pain severity and pain interference.
Each of these is scored 0-10 with higher scores indicating increased pain severity/interference.
|
At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Patient Satisfaction as assessed by a 0-10 satisfaction scale
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Patient reported measure of satisfaction with treatment received and progress made while recovering from injury.
Will be measured on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating increased satisfaction with treatment.
|
6 months
|
|
Out of pocket cost
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Patient reported estimate of patients' out of pocket costs associated with rehabilitation.
|
6 months
|
|
Travel time (hours)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Patient reported estimate of time spent traveling to and from rehabilitation appointments.
|
6 months
|
|
Fear of pain with movement as assessed by the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
17-Item patient questionnaire assessing fear of movement.
Scores range from 17-68 with higher scores indicating increased fear of pain with movement.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Self-Efficacy for Home Exercise Program as assessed by a 12-Item questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
12-Item questionnaire assessing self-efficacy for completing assigned home exercises.
Scored 0-72 with higher scores indicating increased self-efficacy.
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kevin H McLaughlin, DPT, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 28, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
January 22, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 6, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 4, 2023
Last Verified
January 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00210272
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...AO Trauma North AmericaCompletedDisplaced Ankle FracturesUnited States
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Shaikh Zayed Hospital, LahoreCompletedBimalleolar Ankle FracturePakistan
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingFragility Ankle Fractures and Complex Distal Tibial FracturesEgypt
-
University of ArizonaActive, not recruitingUnstable Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic DisruptionUnited States
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityBauerfeindNot yet recruitingAnkle Fracture | Ankle ArthrodesisCanada
-
Encore Medical, L.P.RecruitingBimalleolar Ankle FracturesUnited States
-
Utku GürhanNot yet recruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle FracturesCyprus, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Brian W. NoehrenRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Standard rehabilitation
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | Wrist InjuriesPakistan
-
University of RzeszowRecruiting
-
University of RzeszowNot yet recruitingRehabilitation | Disability Evaluation | Recovery of Function
-
University of RzeszowEnrolling by invitationDisability Evaluation | Recovery of FunctionPoland
-
Henry Ford Health SystemCompleted
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreUnknown
-
Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux MérignacRecruitingHip Arthroplasty, TotalFrance
-
Al Hayah University In CairoRecruitingHypertrophic ScarEgypt
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingPercutaneous CORONARY INTERVENTIONPakistan
-
Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener LandBavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL)RecruitingPost COVID Syndrome | Post-COVID / Long-COVID | POST-Covid 19 | Post-COVID ConditionGermany