Telerehabilitation Following Ankle Fractures

January 4, 2023 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Telerehabilitation Following Ankle Fractures: A Pilot Study

Background and Purpose: Ankle fractures represent one of the most common fractures in North America. Surgical fixation is often required in the presence of dislocation or instability and has been shown to have a high rate of success. Following surgical fixation, physical therapy is commonly utilized to assist in regaining function. Advice alone has been shown to be non-inferior to traditional physical therapy for patients post-ankle fracture in two studies. The results of these studies have yet to be repeated in the US. It is the intent of this study to investigate the feasibility of a large clinical trial comparing the results of traditional physical therapy and an internet-based telerehabilitation program. Following surgical repair of ankle fractures, patients will be randomized to traditional rehabilitation or telerehabilitation. Telerehabilitation may represent an alternative patient option to traditional physical therapy following ankle fracture repair. The results of this study will inform the design of larger multi-site clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of telerehabilitation for this patient population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bimalleolar or trimalleolar fracture
  • Repaired with open reduction internal fixation technique
  • Must have access to computer, tablet, or smart phone with internet access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe soft tissue damage associated with injury
  • Physical or mental conditions that will affect patient's ability to participate in independent rehabilitation
  • Non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional Physical Therapy
Patients will be given a prescription to see a physical therapist and a paper-based rehabilitation protocol. Patients will be allowed to receive physical therapy at a location of patients' choosing. This arm represents the current standard of care.
Prescription for physical therapy and a printed list of exercises to complete.
Active Comparator: Telerehabilitation
Patients will be given access to a website containing instructions with pictures and videos for the exercises patients are to complete as part of patients' rehabilitation. Patients will not be given a prescription to physical therapy. Patients in this group will receive weekly calls from a physical therapist during weeks 6-12 post-operatively.
Internet-guided rehabilitation with weekly phone calls from a physical therapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in self-reported function
Time Frame: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, a patient-reported function of the lower extremity. Scores range from 0-80 with lower scores indicating increased impairment levels.
At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in self-reported quality of life
Time Frame: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Measured using the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. This is a 12-Item global health questionnaire with a physical and mental component scores. Utilizes a t-score method standardized to the US population. Positive t-scores indicate better than average quality of life and negative t-score values represent lower than average quality of life.
At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Change in pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory short form
Time Frame: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Measured using the Brief Pain Inventory short form. This is a 15-item questionnaire resulting in scores for pain severity and pain interference. Each of these is scored 0-10 with higher scores indicating increased pain severity/interference.
At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Patient Satisfaction as assessed by a 0-10 satisfaction scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Patient reported measure of satisfaction with treatment received and progress made while recovering from injury. Will be measured on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating increased satisfaction with treatment.
6 months
Out of pocket cost
Time Frame: 6 months
Patient reported estimate of patients' out of pocket costs associated with rehabilitation.
6 months
Travel time (hours)
Time Frame: 6 months
Patient reported estimate of time spent traveling to and from rehabilitation appointments.
6 months
Fear of pain with movement as assessed by the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
17-Item patient questionnaire assessing fear of movement. Scores range from 17-68 with higher scores indicating increased fear of pain with movement.
2 weeks
Self-Efficacy for Home Exercise Program as assessed by a 12-Item questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 weeks
12-Item questionnaire assessing self-efficacy for completing assigned home exercises. Scored 0-72 with higher scores indicating increased self-efficacy.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin H McLaughlin, DPT, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00210272

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures

Clinical Trials on Standard rehabilitation

Subscribe