Comparison of Autogenous Dentin Matrix Versus Bovine-Derived Xenograft for Socket Preservation

January 29, 2020 updated by: Dr Prabhuji MLV, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

Clinical, Radiographic and Histomorphometric Comparison of Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Bovine-Derived Xenograft for Socket Preservation: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

The present study is a human, prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial will be conducted to explore and compare the clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric outcome of autogenous demineralised dentin(DDM) versus bovine derived xenograft(DBM) for socket preservation procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  • After local anesthesia a full thickness flap will be minimally reflected buccally and lingually around the tooth not exceeding 3mm apical to the alveolar crest.
  • Tooth extraction will be performed using atraumatic extraction methods using Periotome.
  • After extraction, the socket will be thoroughly curetted, inspected and irrigated with sterile saline solution.
  • The socket satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to either test or control group.
  • Intra surgical measurements will be recorded.
  • Socket preservation will be performed with either Demineralized dentin matrix DDM(TEST) or bovine derived xenograft DBM (CONTROL). Bone graft will be extended to the height of intra proximal bone.
  • Collagen membrane will be placed over the grafted site extending approximately 3mm apical to buccal and lingual crest.
  • Flaps will be approximated with sutures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Karnataka
      • Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 562157
        • Recruiting
        • Krishnadevaray College of Dental Science and Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth indicated for extraction and subsequent implant placement
  • Age group of 18 to 55 years
  • Single rooted tooth indicated for extraction due to endodontic failure, caries or Fracture
  • Presence of >2 mm keratinized tissue to allow flap management
  • Extraction site should have adjacent tooth on either side
  • Systemically healthy patients
  • Class II or III extraction socket defects according to Hammerele and Jung(2008)
  • Full mouth plaque score(FMPS)<25% at baseline.(PI)
  • Full mouth bleeding score(FMBS)<25% at baseline. (BI)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • .Presence of dehiscence or fenestration in any of the socket, more than 50% of bone loss in any of the socket walls
  • Medical conditions contraindicating surgical interventions
  • Known smokers and alcoholics
  • Subjects with known bone metabolic disorders.(Pagets disease,fibrous dysplasia etc.)
  • Acute infections at the site of extraction. Eg , Abscess
  • History of malignancy
  • Patients who have undergone radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Periapical pathology such as granulomas, cyst, hypercementosis, ankylosis.
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Maxillary and mandibular 3rd molars.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test group -Autogenous dentin matrix and collagen membrane
Test group - After atraumatic tooth extraction , socket will be augmented with autogenous dentin matrix and covered with collagen membrane and sutures are placed.
Autogenous dentin matrix and collagen membrane(test group) Bovine derived xenograft and collagen membrane (control group)
Active Comparator: Control group-bovine derived xenograft and collagen membrane
control group- After atraumatic tooth extraction, socket will be augmented with bovine derived xenograft and covered with collagen membrane and sutures are placed.
Autogenous dentin matrix and collagen membrane(test group) Bovine derived xenograft and collagen membrane (control group)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Height of Alveolar Crest and Bucco-Lingual Ridge Width
Time Frame: 6 Months
Using Mapping Caliper and (University of North Carolina) UNC- 15 PROBE Measured in mm
6 Months
Alveolar Ridge Width Gain(ARWG) and Vertical Bone Height Gain(VBHG)
Time Frame: 6 MONTHS
CBCT (Cone Beam Computer Tomography) measured in mm
6 MONTHS
New Bone Formation % and Residual Bone Graft
Time Frame: 6 MONTHS
HISTOMORPHOMETRIC
6 MONTHS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque Index
Time Frame: 6months
Silness and Leo index using UNC-15 PROBE with Rating Score Excellent- 0 Good- 0.1 - 0.9 Fair -1.0 - 1.9 Poor - 2.0 - 3.0
6months
Bleeding Index
Time Frame: 6 months

Mombelli - Sulcus Bleeding Index using UNC-15 Probe with Rating Score 0- No bleeding

1 -Isolated bleeding spots visible 2-Blood forms a confluent red line on the margin 3- Heavy or profuse bleeding

6 months
Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Pain and Esthetics
Time Frame: 6 months
( Visual Analog Scale -VAS) Rating score, None (0) Mild (1-3) Moderate (4-6) Severe (7-10)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: DR.JOANN PAULINE GEORGE, MDS, KRISHNADEVARAYA COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCE

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 02_D012_101639

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Resorption

Clinical Trials on socket preservation

3
Subscribe