Self-taken Penile Meatal Swabs for Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea and Mycoplasma Genitalium Detection (Me-swab)

January 24, 2020 updated by: The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Comparison of Self-taken Penile Meatal Swabs Versus First-catch Urine for the Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis, Neisseria Gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma Genitalium

Objectives:

To compare self-taken penile meatal swabs versus first-catch urine samples for the detection of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and Mycoplasma genitalium from the penile urethra using nucleic acid amplification tests.

To assess the acceptability of self-taken penile meatal swabs compared with first-catch urine samples.

To assess the prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in those with urethritis.

To assess the prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium antimicrobial resistance.

To evaluate the utility of using Mycoplasma genitalium resistance-guided therapy.

To compare the cost of using self-taken penile meatal swabs versus FCU samples for the correct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium.

Methods:

Men and transwomen presenting for a sexual health screen will perform a self-taken penile meatal swab followed by a first-catch urine (FCU) sample. Both will be analysed using the Aptima Combo 2 test (Hologic, San Diego, California [CA], USA) for chlamydia and gonorrhoea. In those with urethritis they will also be analysed using Aptima MGen test for Mycoplasma genitalium. Details of demographics, past history, sexual history, clinical symptoms and signs will be collected. The acceptability of each sample will be assessed using a patient questionnaire. The samples of those infected with Mycoplasma genitalium will be tested for Mycoplasma genitalium macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance mutations by in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Sanger sequencing to characterise mutants in the 23s gene for macrolide resistance and DNA gyrase subunit A (gyrA) and DNA topoisomerase IV subunit C (parC) genes for fluoroquinolone resistance. The result of this will be used to guide the therapy prescribed to treat the infection.

Primary outcome:

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of self-taken penile meatal swabs compared with FCU samples for the detection of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and Mycoplasma genitalium in the penile urethra.

Secondary outcomes:

Acceptability of self-taken penile meatal swabs compared with FCU samples for the detection of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and Mycoplasma genitalium.

Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in those with urethritis.

Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium antimicrobial resistance.

Utility of using Mycoplasma genitalium resistance-guided therapy.

Cost of using self-taken penile meatal swabs versus FCU samples for the correct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Methods The study population will be men and transwomen aged 18 and over presenting to Leeds Sexual Health who wish to be tested for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and M. genitalium (if symptoms of urethritis are present). Those who have taken antibiotics (except metronidazole) in the past 14 days will be excluded. Details of age, ethnicity, past sexually transmitted infection (STI) history, being in contact with a STI and symptoms suggestive of a bacterial STI (urethral discharge, dysuria, testicular pain and swelling) will be collected. Prior to any examination by the clinician the participant will be asked to perform a self-taken penile meatal swab following the written and diagrammatic instructions for self-collected penile meatal swabs using the technique recommended by Hologic. Those with genital symptoms will be examined and the presence of urethral discharge and testicular swelling and tenderness will be recorded. A urethral swab for microscopy and gonococcal culture will be taken by the clinician if there is any evidence of urethral discharge. Those who have no genital symptoms will not be examined and will not have a urethral swab for microscopy or gonococcal culture taken as in routine clinical practice. All men will then be asked to perform a FCU sample. The penile meatal swab and FCU will be tested for M. genitalium if there are symptoms of urethritis. The first 500 participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire of six questions on how easy/difficult, and comfortable/uncomfortable, they found taking the penile meatal swab was compared to collecting the FCU and their overall sample preference.

Consequently each participant will have two different samples taken:

Meatal swab: Aptima Combo 2 assay; Aptima MGen assay (if symptoms of urethritis)

First-catch urine sample: Aptima Combo 2 assay; Aptima MGen assay (if symptoms of urethritis)

The self-taken penile meatal and the FCU samples will be tested for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae using the Hologic Aptima Combo 2 assay (AC2), and those from participants with symptoms of urethritis will be tested for M. genitalium using Aptima MGen assay, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Hologic, San Diego, CA, USA). Positive tests for C. trachomatis will be retested using the Aptima CT assay and positive tests for N. gonorrhoeae will be retested using the Aptima GC assay, both of which use a different target to the AC2. A test will only be categorised as clinically positive if the appropriate confirmatory test is also positive. Positive tests for M. genitalium will be tested for M. genitalium macrolide and fluoroquinolone-resistance mutations by in-house PCR using Sanger sequencing to characterise mutants in the 23s gene for macrolide resistance and gyrA and parC genes for fluoroquinolone resistance (as developed by the Sexually Transmitted Bacteria Reference Unit, Public Health England). The resistance test will also act as the confirmatory test if the amplification is successful. It is anticipated that amplification will not be successful in up to 20% of the positive Aptima Mgen assays, because of the better sensitity of the commercial assay, in which case these positive samples for M. genitalium will be frozen, batched and shipped to Hologic, San Diego, CA, for confirmatory testing. The participant will be managed as if M. genitalium positive whilst waiting for these confirmatory results in view of the high specificity of the Aptima MGen assay, and to avoid further morbidity and sexual transmission.

All patients diagnosed as having chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea will be given treatment and managed with partner notification and follow up as per the clinic protocols and national guidelines. All patients tested for M. genitalium will have been diagnosed as having urethritis so will have been treated initially with doxycycline for seven days. Those who are positive for M. genitalium will be tested for M. genitalium macrolide and fluoroquinolone-resistance mutations. The result of this will be used to guide the therapy prescribed to treat the infection as per the United Kingdom (UK) and European guidelines. It is anticipated that about 50% of M. genitalium infections will be resistant to the first-line treatment of an extended regimen of azithromycin. These men will be treated with moxifloxacin. The men with both macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance will be treated with a guideline recommended third-line treatment. Those where the amplification to perform resistance testing was unsuccessful will have been treated initially with doxycycline for seven days. Following this they will be given an extended course of azithromycin. If there is no clinical resolution, and/or if they are still M. genitalium positive at test of cure, they will be treated with moxifloxacin. A test of cure will be performed at five weeks following the start of treatment using both a self-taken penile meatal swab and a FCU sample. The current sexual partners will be tested for M. genitalium and given the same antibiotic regimen if positive.

Data from the Case Report Forms (CRFs) will be entered using the unique study number onto a secure computer system database which will be password protected. Data entry will be cross checked for errors and the database will contain alerts to identify if data being entered are illogical, inconsistent or incomplete. The master list of clinic unique identification codes and study numbers, and the CRFs will be kept in a secure locked cabinet, within a locked office, within Leeds Sexual Health.

Determination of patient infected status Patients will be classified as infected or not infected based on one positive (confirmed) AC2 test for C. trachomatis; one positive (confirmed) AC2 test for N. gonorrhoeae or a positive culture for N. gonorrhoeae; and one positive Aptima Mgen test.

The Department of Microbiology will perform the nucleic acid amplification assays and the M. genitalium macrolide and fluoroquinolone-resistance mutation assays.

Power calculation and statistical analysis It is anticipated that the sensitivity of the self-taken penile meatal swabs will be similar to the Dize study rather than the Chernesky study as all participants will perform the penile meatal sample first. The investigators predict a sensitivity of 92% for chlamydia and 99% for gonorrhoea. It is anticipated that the sensitivity of the FCU samples will be similar to the Chernesky study rather than the Dize study as a urine collection device will not be used. The investigators predict a sensitivity of 83% for chlamydia and 85% for gonorrhoea. There is only one published study comparing penile meatal swabs and FCU for M. genitalium detection. This reported 100% sensitivity with penile meatal swabs and 83% with FCU.

For the gonorrhoea analysis, 85 positive samples would detect a significant difference between a sensitivity of 85% and 99% with 80% power and 95% probability. For the chlamydia analysis, 260 positive samples would detect a significant difference between a sensitivity of 83% and 92% with 80% power and 95% probability. For the M. genitalium analysis, 80 positive samples would detect a significant difference between a sensitivity of 85% and 99% with 80% power and 95% probability (slightly higher sensitivity of FCU and lower of penile meatal swab used as only one published study).

The urethral gonorrhoea prevalence in the male population to be studied is at least 3.7% including asymptomatic men. Including 2400 symptomatic and asymptomatic participants, will give more than 85 positive individuals with 3.7% prevalence. The urethral chlamydia prevalence in the male population to be studied is at least 11%. 2400 participants will give 260 positive individuals with 11% prevalence. The prevalence of M. genitalium in those with symptoms of urethritis in the population to be studied is not known as a European approved Conformité Européene marked (CE marked) commercial diagnostic test has only just become available. In 2017, 500 cases of male non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) were seen of which 100 (20%) would be expected to be M. genitalium positive. All with symptomatic gonococcal urethritis will also be tested for M. genitalium, of whom up to 10 men per year may also be positive for M. genitalium. This means the sample size of 80 would be achievable within 15 months with a 50-60% uptake in patients with symptoms of urethritis. It is expected that the uptake will be high, especially in those with symptoms of urethritis, as the study offers testing for M. genitalium which is not yet available in routine clinical practice as there is no funding for this service currently. The investigators have performed and published similar studies in order to identify the optimum sample for detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea in females where 42 clinicians recruited almost 4000 females in 10 months which was shorter than the planned recruitment period.

All data analysis will be performed using the study number. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be determined for self-taken penile meatal swabs and first-catch urine samples by comparing test results with the patient infected status. The comparison between self-taken penile meatal swabs and FCU samples will be by McNemar's test. The analyses for chlamydia and gonorrhoea detection will also be calculated in those with symptoms and those without symptoms.

Utility of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)-guided therapy The utility of using AMR-guided therapy will be measured by the numbers that would have been given inappropriate antibiotics if the NGU guideline had been followed by giving doxycycline, then extended azithromycin, then moxifloxacin.

Cost comparison The economic analysis will be a simple cost comparison and will focus on whether using self-taken penile meatal swabs gives a cost saving compared to FCU samples. The analysis will use the correct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium as the primary endpoint and adopt the perspective of the UK National Health Service/Prescribed Specialist Services (NHS/PSS) in line with NICE recommendations (NICE 2013). Costs will be calculated from a sub-sample of 240 participants. NHS resource use and costs will be collected prospectively and will include costs of clinic time and resources and laboratory time and resources. Clinic staff will complete a specially designed data collection form for every trial participant during a 5-6 week period of the study. Information on unit costs or prices will be sourced to attach to each resource use item, to enable an overall cost to be calculated (e.g. Curtis & Burns 2016). The final comparison will be based on cost per correct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium using self-taken penile meatal swabs versus FCU samples.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 97 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and transwomen who have male genitalia
  • Aged 18 and over
  • Ever sexually active
  • Presenting to Leeds Sexual Health wishing to be tested for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and M. genitalium (if symptoms of urethritis are present)
  • Give verbal consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Never sexually active
  • Non-male genitalia
  • Unwilling to give verbal consent
  • Unwilling to perform a self-taken penile meatal swab and unwilling/unable to perform a first-catch urine sample
  • Having taken antibiotics (other than metronidazole) in the past 14 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Intervention and Control
Self-taken penile meatal swabs versus first-catch urine for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium using Aptima-Combo2 and Aptima Mgen
Self-taken penile meatal swabs versus first-catch urine samples for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium using Aptima-Combo2 and Aptima Mgen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of self-taken penile meatal swabs compared with FCU samples for the detection of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and Mycoplasma genitalium in the penile urethra.
At time of enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant reported acceptability of self-taken penile meatal swabs compared with FCU samples for the detection of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and Mycoplasma genitalium.
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Participant-reported acceptability of self-taken penile meatal swabs compared with FCU samples. The participants will complete questions on how easy/difficult, and comfortable/uncomfortable, they found taking the penile meatal swab compared to collecting the FCU and their overall sample preference of sample.
At time of enrollment
Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in those with urethritis.
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in those with urethritis.
At time of enrollment
Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium antimicrobial resistance.
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium antimicrobial resistance.
At time of enrollment
Utility of using Mycoplasma genitalium resistance-guided therapy to prevent inappropriate antibiotic use.
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
The utility of using AMR-guided therapy will be measured by the numbers of participants that would have been given inappropriate antibiotics if the NGU guideline had been followed by giving doxycycline, then extended azithromycin, then moxifloxacin compared to resistance-guided therapy.
6 months after enrollment
Cost comparison
Time Frame: At time of enrollment
Cost of using self-taken penile meatal swabs versus FCU samples for the correct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium.
At time of enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial

Clinical Trials on Aptima-Combo2 and Aptima Mgen

3
Subscribe