- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04252092
Effects Of Sensory Training and Electrical Stimulation on Sole of The Foot Sensations in Patients With Acute Hemiplegia
Effects Of Sensory Training and Electrical Stimulation in Sole of The Foot on Proprioceptive and Cortical Sensations in Patients With Acute Hemiplegia
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hemiplegia is a syndrome characterized by disorders of motor and sensory functions, speech and mental abilities. Hemiplegia is a common neurological problem in the world and is the third most common cause of death.
In addition to motor loss in patients after stroke, sensory problems are accompanied and close to 60% of stroke patients experience sensory problems. In a limited number of studies in the literature, it is stated that sensory impairment in the lower extremity negatively affects standing, walking speed, balance during ambulation and symmetrical gait. At the same time, it has been proven that the sole of the foot sense plays an important role in the balance of sitting, standing up and performing independent daily living activities. After a stroke, sensory training increases functionality, patients with sensory training recover faster, mobility, balance and daily life activities become better, and daily life improvement is expressed. The purpose of sensory training is to maximize the patient's learning through the connection between environment and repetitive activities.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of neurodevelopmental physiotherapy program combined with sensory training or electrical stimulation on the sole of the foot proprioceptive and cortical senses in individuals diagnosed with hemiplegia.
There is no study on how proprioceptive and cortical sensations will be affected in acute hemiplegic patients if sensory training and electrical stimulation are added to the classical treatment program. By finding and comparing the effects of active (sensory training) and passive treatment (electric stimulation) with this study, it was planned to propose an effective treatment protocol for developing the sole of the foot senses to the experts working in this field.
As a result, purpose of the study is to prevent inadequate sensory input in hemiplegic patients from adversely affecting quality of life.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
- Eksen Sağlık
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participating to the study in a voluntary basis
- Patients with 50-80 years old
- A stroke diagnosis by a neurologist
- A stroke attack within 6 months
- Minimum 18 points from Mini Mental Test
- Medically stable
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unstable condition
- Other neurological or orthopaedic problems that will affect function other than stroke
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Diabetic foot ulcers
- Part/total foot amputation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sensory Group
15 patients who will be applied 15 sessions of sensory training
|
15 session,20 minutes sensory training program
|
|
Experimental: Electrical Stimulation Group
15 patients who will be applied 15 sessions of electrical stimulation
|
15 session,20 minutes electrical stimulation program
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment Of Joint Position Sense
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 3
|
Joint position sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. The patient's eyes will be closed. One of the foot on the hemiplegic side of the patient will be brought to a certain position and the patient will be asked to bring the other extremity to a similar position. In the case of the correct response to 8 and above from ten attempts, the sense of sensation is considered normal; correct response between 3-7, the sense of sensation is considered decreased; correct response 3 and below, the sense of sensation is considered lost. Higher scores mean better outcomes with 0 being minimum and 10 being maximum. |
Baseline and Week 3
|
|
Assesment of Joint Passive Motion Sense
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 3
|
Joint passive motion sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. The patient's eyes will be closed. One of the patient's big toe in hemiplegic their side will be held on either side and moved up or down. During this time, the patient will be asked to indicate the direction of the movement. In the case of the correct response to 8 and above from ten attempts, the sense of sensation is considered normal; correct response between 3-7, the sense of sensation is considered decreased; correct response 3 and below, the sense of sensation is considered lost. Higher scores mean better outcomes with 0 being minimum and 10 being maximum. |
Baseline and Week 3
|
|
Assessment of Vibration Sense
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 3
|
Vibration sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments.
It is evaluated with a vibrating diapason.
While the eyes are closed, the diapason will be placed on the tip of the big toe of the hemiplegic foot, the patient will be asked if the vibration is felt or not.
If it is felt, this time the patient will be asked to indicate the moment when the vibration ends.
Thus, the time it detects the vibration is determined.
This period is about 20 seconds in normal youth.
As the age progresses, it should be remembered that vibration time is shortened in lower extremities.
|
Baseline and Week 3
|
|
Assesment of Deep Pain Sense
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 3
|
Deep pain sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments.
If the Achilles tendon is squeezed or the muscles are severely suppressed, it is investigated whether or not the pain is felt.
If pain is felt, the result will be counted as positive.
The positive result is an unwanted result.
|
Baseline and Week 3
|
|
Assessment of Two-point Discrimination
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 3
|
Two-point discrimination sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments.
The points of the blunt wig will be held against the hemiplegic sole of the foot at different distances from each other.
Instruct the client to respond to each touch, by saying one point or two points.
Eyes should be closed during the examination.
When the patient feels two, it will be noted how far away in cm away from the wig.
|
Baseline and Week 3
|
|
Assessment of Graphesthesia
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 3
|
Graphesthesia assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. The patient will be asked to estimate a letter or number written the sole of the hemiplegic foot with a blunt object while the eyes are closed. In the case of the correct response to 8 and above from ten attempts, the sense of sensation is considered normal; correct response between 3-7, the sense of sensation is considered decreased; correct response 3 and below, the sense of sensation is considered lost. Higher scores mean better outcomes with 0 being minimum and 10 being maximum. |
Baseline and Week 3
|
|
Assessment of Tactile Localization Sense
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 3
|
Tactile localization sense assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments. Patients will be stimulated on 10 different locations of the hemiplegic sole of the foot. They will be asked to localize the touch. The response will be recorded. In the case of the correct response to 8 and above from ten attempts, the sense of sensation is considered normal; correct response between 3-7, the sense of sensation is considered decreased; correct response 3 and below, the sense of sensation is considered lost. Higher scores mean better outcomes with 0 being minimum and 10 being maximum. |
Baseline and Week 3
|
|
Assessment of Tactile Inattention
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 3
|
Tactile inattention assessment will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning and end of treatments.The patient will close his eyes.
The right and the left half of the body will be needled at the same time.
The patient with tactile inattention perceives only one of them which is counted as positive.
The positive result is an unwanted result.
|
Baseline and Week 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment Of Cognitive Level
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Mini-mental test will be applied to all subjects (30 patients) at the beginning of treatments. A mini-mental test will be performed to evaluate the patient's cognitive level. This test will be used because it evaluates orientation, recording memory, attention, and computation, remembering and language, orientation, praxis skills. In the test consisting of 30 questions and 30 points, a total of ≥25 points were considered normal, 21-24 points Light, 10-20 points medium, and ≤9 serious cognitive disorders. Higher scores mean better outcome with 0 being minimum and 30 being maximum. |
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- i79zrwdy
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hemiplegia
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedAlternating Hemiplegia of ChildhoodFrance
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Completed
-
University of SalamancaCompleted
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandUniversité d'AuvergneCompletedInfantile HemiplegiaFrance
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaCompleted
-
University Hospital of Mont-GodinneUniversité Catholique de LouvainUnknownBimanual Training in Children With Hemiplegia With Lower Limb and Postural Stimulation (HABIT & Leg)Congenital HemiplegiaBelgium
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Konya Beyhekim Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedAlternating HemiplegiaFrance
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedAlternating HemiplegiaFrance
Clinical Trials on Sensory training
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Shirley Ryan AbilityLab; Northwestern Memorial HospitalCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Coma | Minimally Conscious State | Vegetative StateUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedMultiple SclerosisItaly
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingAutism Spectrum DisorderPakistan
-
Montiha AzeemRecruitingChronic Ischemic StrokePakistan
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiNot yet recruitingDysmenorrhea | KinesiophobiaTurkey
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompletedStroke | Stroke RehabilitationTurkey
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruiting
-
Superior UniversityRecruitingKnee OsteoarthritisPakistan