Stabilometric Assessment of Balance Recovery in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

May 5, 2014 updated by: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Stabilometric Assessment of Context Dependent Balance Recovery in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Balance control relies on accurate perception of visual, somatosensory and vestibular cues. Sensory flow is impaired in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and little is known about the ability of the sensory systems to adapt after neurological lesions reducing sensory impairment. The aims of the present study were to verify whether:

  1. Balance rehabilitation administered in a challenging sensory conditions would improve stability in upright posture
  2. the improvement in a treated sensory condition would transfer to a non treated sensory condition.

Methods: Fifty three persons with Multiple Sclerosis, median (min-max) Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 5 (2.5-6.5), participated in a Randomized Controlled Trial and were randomly assigned to two groups. The Experimental group received balance rehabilitation aimed at improving motor and sensory strategies. The Control group received rehabilitation treatment which did not include training of sensory strategies. Persons with Multiple Sclerosis were blindly assessed by means of a stabilometric platform with eyes open, eyes closed and dome, on both firm surface and foam. Anterior-posterior and medio-lateral sway, velocity of sway and the length of Center of Pressure (CoP) trajectory were calculated in the six sensory conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20148
        • Fondazione Don Gnocchi ONLUS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically or laboratory definite relapsing-remitting, primary or secondary progressive MS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to stand independently in upright position for 30 seconds
  • Inability to walk for 6 m even with an assistive device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sensory training
Experimental group received balance rehabilitation aimed at improving motor strategies and sensory strategies. Subjects in this group were treated to improve recovery of sensory impairment and were given exercises in the impaired sensory conditions, inhibiting the reliable sensory systems and forcing the Central Nervous System to use the impaired ones.
No Intervention: No sensory strategy
Control group received usual care rehabilitation which did not include training of sensory strategies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline at three weeks (end of treatment) for the following variables: Length [mm]; Velocity[mm/s]; Sway[mm]
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks (end of treatment)

Multivariate assessment. Length [mm]: length of CoP trajectory computed as sum of CoP displacement on the platform surface for each frame; Velocity: velocity of oscillations along anterior-posterior (VelAP) and medio-lateral (VelML) axes. These are computed as the first time derivative of CoP AP and ML displacement.

Sway: standard deviation of CoP time series along anterior-posterior (SwayAP) and medio-lateral (SwayML) axes;

Baseline, 3 weeks (end of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of falls
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks (end of treatment)
baseline, 3 weeks (end of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Sensory training

3
Subscribe