Effect of mCIMT Casting on Speech-language Outcomes in Children With Hemiparesis

September 20, 2021 updated by: Sudarshan Dayanidhi, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) has been successfully used with children who have hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body.) mCIMT uses a removable cast during treatment and home exercise programs. It has been found that mCIMT can improve use, strength and coordination of a child's affected hand, and may also help improve speech and language skills. The goal of this project is to investigate whether combining mCIMT with speech therapy will enhance speech outcomes in children with cerebral palsy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often have hemiplegia, meaning only one side of the body is affected. They may have difficulty with daily tasks that require two hands. They may also have difficulty with speech and/or language. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a treatment that has been used to help improve children's performance of everyday activities and enhance their quality of life. CIMT uses a cast on the unaffected arm to encourage use of the affected hand. In traditional CIMT, a child wears a non-removable cast 24 hours a day for a duration of time. A more child-friendly version, modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT), uses a removable cast during treatment and home exercise programs. It has been found that mCIMT can improve use, strength and coordination of a child's affected hand. Preliminary studies have also shown some speech and language improvement in children with speech impairments who participated in mCIMT.

The goal of this project is to investigate whether combining mCIMT with speech and language treatment (SPT) will enhance speech outcomes when compared with SPT alone. We will examine (1) whether it is feasible and effective to deliver (SPT) and mCIMT simultaneously, and (2) whether providing mCIMT simultaneously with SPT leads to greater gains in speech-language outcomes than SPT alone? Such information could add valuable evidence-based treatment options for children with hemiplegia and comorbid speech-language deficits, change the way in which we plan patients' care, and help justify co-treating patients who get mCIMT. We hypothesize that forced use of the impaired limb in therapeutic tasks would have spread effects resulting in increased rate of speech-language improvement during treatment intervals when the patient is casted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy
  • Hemiplegia
  • Speech-Language Impairment
  • English as primary language spoken in the patient's home
  • Normal or corrected hearing and vision

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of co-morbid developmental disability (not including specific language impairment) which has an impact on cognition, sensory processing, and/or social-pragmatic function
  • Non-corrected hearing loss as evidenced by audiology report, failure to pass a newborn hearing screening, and/or performance on pure-tone testing.
  • Non-corrected vision impairments
  • Weakness on both sides or neither side of the body
  • Bilingual speakers or patients who speak languages other than English
  • Previous history of CIMT or mCIMT within the past 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Speech-Language Treatment plus mCIMT

4 participants

Baseline phase: Speech-language treatment (SLT), 1 hour a day, 3 days a week. The length of the baseline phase will be staggered across subjects.

Treatment phase: SLT combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy(mCIMT) 1 hour a day, 3 days a week.

Total of baseline and treatment sessions will be 20 to 30 sessions.

Age-appropriate play activities with speech-language pathologist (SLP) to elicit speech, using stimulation strategies including but not limited to recasts, expansion, parallel talk, interactive modeling, communication temptations, and phrase completions. Activities will include an age-appropriate story, pretend play (i.e., house with people, playing with a baby doll), an assembly task (i.e., building blocks, making pretend pizza), and a highly motivating, clinician-controlled activity (i.e., blowing bubbles, swing, pushing cars down a ramp).
Participants will wear a removable cast and an occupational therapist will be present during therapy to focus on facilitating play with the affected arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probes
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks
Number of trained words and phrases produced during a treatment session.
Up to 15 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Length of Utterance
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks
Average length of utterances produced during treatment sessions
Up to 15 weeks
Test of Early Language Development (TELD)
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks
Standardized assessment of spoken language skills
Up to 15 weeks
Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-2 (GFTA-2)
Time Frame: Up to 15 weeks
Standardized assessment of production of sounds in words
Up to 15 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sudarshan Dayanidhi, PT, PhD, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Speech-language therapy (SLT)

3
Subscribe