The Effect of Whole-body Vibration Training

February 17, 2020 updated by: HUI CHUN YANG, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

The Effect of Whole-body Vibration Training on Biomarkers and Health Beliefs of Prefrail Older Adults: A Quasi-experimental Research

The whole-body vibration programme employed in this study partly improved the biomarkers and health beliefs of the prefrail community-dwelling older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The experimental group participated in a 12-week whole-body vibration training that conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration at 12-Hz frequency and 3-mm amplitude each time

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 99 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age of 65 years or older and living in a community
  • Full consciousness and able to communicate verbally
  • No severe cognitive disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Impaired mobility after recent surgery
  • Major illness such as cancer
  • Severe hearing impairment and inability to fully understand and follow instructions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: whole-body vibration training
a 12-week whole-body vibration training that conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration at 12-Hz frequency and 3-mm amplitude each time.
The experimental group participated in a 12-week whole-body vibration training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration at 12-Hz frequency and 3-mm amplitude each time. The control group were provided home DVDs on resistance exercise and manuals for preventing frailty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pretest and posttest results of the experimental and control groups for Grip strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Comparison of grip strength before and after 12 weeks of training
Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Pretest and posttest results of the experimental and control groups for 15-foot walk test speed
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Comparison of 15-foot walk test speed before and after 12 weeks of training
Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Pretest and posttest results of the experimental and control groups for One-leg standing test using the dominant leg with the eyes open
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Comparison of One-leg standing test with the eyes open before and after 12 weeks of training
Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Pretest and posttest results of the experimental and control groups for Thirty-second chair stand test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Comparison of Thirty-second chair stand test before and after 12 weeks of training
Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Pretest and posttest results of the experimental and control groups for Two-minute step test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Comparison of Two-minute step test before and after 12 weeks of training
Change from baseline at 12 weeks (The experimental group participated training that was conducted 3 times per week, with 5-min continuous vibration)
Pretest and posttest results of the experimental and control groups for Health beliefs
Time Frame: The twelfth week
Comparison of health beliefs before and after 12 weeks
The twelfth week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Summary of posttest ANCOVA of the experimental and control groups for biomarkers
Time Frame: The twelfth week
One-way ANCOVA was conducted using the groups as the independent variable and the pretest results and sex as covariate variables to assess the intervention effectiveness
The twelfth week
Summary of posttest ANCOVA of the experimental and control groups for health beliefs
Time Frame: The twelfth week
One-way ANCOVA was conducted using the groups as the independent variable and the pretest results and sex as covariate variables to assess the intervention effectiveness
The twelfth week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 18, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biomarkers

Clinical Trials on whole-body vibration training

3
Subscribe