Effects of Low-level Laser Therapy After Surgical Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molar

July 31, 2020 updated by: Le Thanh Thai Ha, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Postoperative Analgesic and Anti-inflammation Effects of Low-level Laser Therapy After Surgical Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molar

Goal: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-level laser (LLL) after surgical removal of impacted lower third molars (ILTM).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Goal: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-level laser (LLL) after surgical removal of impacted lower third molars (ILTM), including pain level, postoperative facial swelling, trismus and non-stimulated saliva secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dictrict 5
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Dictrict 5, Vietnam, 70000
        • Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • had two impacted lower third molars symmetrically in the same position as the classifications of Pell- Gregory and Winter diagnosed by 2D panoramic radiography

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pregnant, local infections
  • refused to participate in the study
  • patients who did not follow-up visit would be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser
Subsequently to the suture, laser was applied in the right or left side randomly on each patient, according to a sheet of randomization. GaAlAs laser (AMD Picasso, Dentsply Sirona, York, Pennsylvania, USA) with a wavelength of 810 nm was placed intraorally, at a distance of 1 cm in the position of the extracted tooth socket and circling in a 2 cm - diameter area. The power applied was 0.5 ± 20% W, continuously for 30 s. The total real energy released was 12.8 J and the real energy density applied was 4 J/cm2.
GaAlAs laser (AMD Picasso, Dentsply Sirona, York, Pennsylvania, USA) with a wavelength of 810 nm was placed intraorally, at a distance of 1 cm in the position of the extracted tooth socket and circling in a 2 cm - diameter area. The power applied was 0.5 ± 20% W, continuously for 30 s. The total real energy released was 12.8 J and the real energy density applied was 4 J/cm2. Each patient was irradiated 3 times consecutively right after surgery, day 1 and day 2 after surgery
No Intervention: Non-laser
Every patient, on the control side, the same handpiece was applied intraorally, but laser was not activated

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain degree
Time Frame: at 2 hours after stopping the feeling of numbness lips
Likert scale
at 2 hours after stopping the feeling of numbness lips
Pain degree
Time Frame: at 4 hours after stopping the feeling of numbness lips
Likert scale
at 4 hours after stopping the feeling of numbness lips
Pain degree
Time Frame: at 6 hours after stopping the feeling of numbness lips
Likert scale
at 6 hours after stopping the feeling of numbness lips
Pain degree
Time Frame: at 24 hours after surgery
Likert scale
at 24 hours after surgery
Pain degree
Time Frame: at 48 hours after surgery
Likert scale
at 48 hours after surgery
Face swelling degree
Time Frame: on first day after surgery
Mark indelibly on the skin of points used to record the preoperative swelling level based on benchmarks A, B, C, D. A was the external canthus of the eye, B was the Gonion, C was the lip-commissure and D was the lowest point of the earlobe. The degree of face swelling was determined by using measuring tape (rounded to the nearest millimeter line): vertically from the external canthus of the eye to the Gonion (segment AB) and horizontally: from earlobe to the lip-commissure (CD segment). To evaluate generally face swelling, we computed the swelling area (mm2) approximately by the formula AB*CD/2
on first day after surgery
Face swelling degree
Time Frame: on second day after surgery
Mark indelibly on the skin of points used to record the preoperative swelling level based on benchmarks A, B, C, D. A was the external canthus of the eye, B was the Gonion, C was the lip-commissure and D was the lowest point of the earlobe. The degree of face swelling was determined by using measuring tape (rounded to the nearest millimeter line): vertically from the external canthus of the eye to the Gonion (segment AB) and horizontally: from earlobe to the lip-commissure (CD segment). To evaluate generally face swelling, we computed the swelling area (mm2) approximately by the formula AB*CD/2
on second day after surgery
Trismus degree
Time Frame: on day 1 postoperatively
measuring the distance between the mesial angle of the central incisors of the upper and lower (maximum oral aperture, MOA) of the patient with a caliper
on day 1 postoperatively
Trismus degree
Time Frame: on day 2 postoperatively
measuring the distance between the mesial angle of the central incisors of the upper and lower (maximum oral aperture, MOA) of the patient with a caliper
on day 2 postoperatively
sIgA concentration
Time Frame: the second day after surgery
Firstly, the saliva sample was centrifuged for 10 minutes, speed 3000 rpm, at 40 degrees Celsius. After eliminating oral mucosa cells, red blood cells, the 500 µl of the sample solution was added 5 µl proteolytic inhibitor to avoid cleavage of the sIgA antibodies in the sample to be investigated. The sample was vibrated with a vortex vibrator for 20 seconds and stored in -80°C. After collecting enough samples, the samples were performed the Elisa sandwich procedure according to the standard instructions of Kit Elisa Elabscience Human Secretory IgA (Elabscience Biotechnology, Houston, Texas, US) using Elisa IRE 96 SFRI Kit reader 450nm (SFRI, Saint-Jean-d'Illac, France)
the second day after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Face swelling degree
Time Frame: before surgery
Mark indelibly on the skin of points used to record the preoperative swelling level based on benchmarks A, B, C, D. A was the external canthus of the eye, B was the Gonion, C was the lip-commissure and D was the lowest point of the earlobe. The degree of face swelling was determined by using measuring tape (rounded to the nearest millimeter line): vertically from the external canthus of the eye to the Gonion (segment AB) and horizontally: from earlobe to the lip-commissure (CD segment). To evaluate generally face swelling, we computed the swelling area (mm2) approximately by the formula AB*CD/2
before surgery
sIgA concentration
Time Frame: before the surgery
Firstly, the saliva sample was centrifuged for 10 minutes, speed 3000 rpm, at 40 degrees Celsius. After eliminating oral mucosa cells, red blood cells, the 500 µl of the sample solution was added 5 µl proteolytic inhibitor to avoid cleavage of the sIgA antibodies in the sample to be investigated. The sample was vibrated with a vortex vibrator for 20 seconds and stored in -80°C. After collecting enough samples, the samples were performed the Elisa sandwich procedure according to the standard instructions of Kit Elisa Elabscience Human Secretory IgA (Elabscience Biotechnology, Houston, Texas, US) using Elisa IRE 96 SFRI Kit reader 450nm (SFRI, Saint-Jean-d'Illac, France)
before the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ly TB Nguyen, PhD, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NT62 72 28 01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on GaAlAs laser

3
Subscribe