Comparison of Transdermal Fentanyl and Morphine for Oral Mucositis Pain in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients

July 28, 2020 updated by: Jiarong Chen, MD

A Comparison of Oral Controlled-release Morphine With Transdermal Fentanyl in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients With Moderate or Severe Oral Mucositis Pain Induced by Chemoradiotherapy

The primary purpose of this study is to explore the significance of analgesic treatment for radiation-induced oral mucositis pain in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma during radiotherapy, and to compare the analgesic effect of morphine controlled-release tablets with that of fentanyl transdermal patch. Half of participants will receive morphine controlled-release tablets,while the other half will receive fentanyl transdermal patch.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Morphine controlled-release tablets and fentanyl transdermal patch each relieve radiation-induced oral mucositis pain in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. But they do so by different mechanisms and in different effects.

Morphine is a classic strong analgesic, which has been widely used in patients with advanced cancer pain. It has achieved satisfactory results in pain control, sleep improvement and quality of life. Oral morphine has been regarded as the standard treatment for moderate and severe cancer pain.

Fentanyl transdermal patch is a system device for transdermal delivery of drugs. It is compressed on a film containing fentanyl memory. The film can continuously release fentanyl into the blood circulation and maintain stable for more than 72 hours. It is not affected by gastrointestinal PH or food, and it has no hepatic frst-pass effect, with a bioavailability of up to 92%.

This study will test the efficacy and safety of morphine controlled-release tablets compared to fentanyl transdermal patch in the treatment of pain in patients with radiation-induced oral mucositis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were pathologically newly diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and had no previous history of other tumors
  • According to the treatment strategies of doctors, patients need to receive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (for example, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy) or targeted therapy
  • Never use a opioid before treatment
  • Hematology: WBC≥4.0×109/L, ANC≥1.5×109/L, PLT≥100×109/L,Hb≥90g/L.
  • Participants with the ability to assess the pain level
  • Willingness to return to enrolling institution for follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients do not conform to the inclusion criteria
  • Known allergy to fentanyl, morphine, or any known component of the drug formulation
  • Refuse to use of opioid drugs
  • Nasopharyngeal patients with mental illness
  • Current untreated or unresolved oral candidiasis or oral HSV infection
  • Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens
  • Pregnant or Nursing women
  • Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception
  • Other contraindications or unsuitable conditions for radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fentanyl
Intervention: Drug: Fentanyl Transdermal Patch
Patch releasing drug at the rate of 25 µg/hour, increasing by 25 µg/hour increments to maintain the NRS score≤3 after the frst 24 hours according to no change in pain control. The maximum dose allowed in this study is 300 µg/hour.
Other Names:
  • Duragesic
Active Comparator: Morphine
Intervention: Drug: Morphine Controlled-Release Tablets
Tablets taken orally, twice daily, morning & evening with preferably 12 hours (not less than 6 hours) between doses. Titration phase: starting at 30 mg, increasing at a minimum of 3 days intervals by 20 mg, with a maximum dose of 100 mg. Maintenance phase: continuing on dose level established in titration phase.
Other Names:
  • MeiShi KangDing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity Measure
Time Frame: Through chemoradiotherapy completion, 3 weeks
Self reported pain intensity once a day according to the numeric rating scale (NRS), with 0-10(0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as can be). The higher scores indicate worse pain.
Through chemoradiotherapy completion, 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through chemoradiotherapy completion, 3 weeks
All adverse events were recorded during treatment, and the skin was examined for local reactions during treatment and after removal of fentanyl transdermal patch.
Through chemoradiotherapy completion, 3 weeks
Quality-of-Life composite Index
Time Frame: Through chemoradiotherapy completion, an average of 2 weeks
Quality-of-Life was assessed using Karnofsky performance status (KPS) standards of the Union for International Cancer Control and SPAASMS (Score for pain, Physical activity levels, Additional pain medication, Additional physician/emergency room visits, Sleep, Mood, and Side effects) scores before and after 3 days of treatment. The higher KPS scores(0-100) of patients indicate better quality of life, but the higher SPAASMS scores(0-31) mean worse outcome.
Through chemoradiotherapy completion, an average of 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jiarong Chen, PhD, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Fentanyl

Subscribe