Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty

February 11, 2024 updated by: Olfa kaabachi, MD, University Tunis El Manar

Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block After Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery

Controlling pain after hip replacement surgery improves comfort and partient satisfaction. Pain after hip replacement has traditionally been managed using systemic pain medications including acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A recent Cochrane review demonstrated that compared to systemic analgesia alone, peripheral nerve blocks reduce postoperative pain with moderate-quality evidence. Pericapsular Nerve Group block is a new technique allowing local anesthetic diffusion to femoral, obturator and accessory obturator nerves and providing a good analgesic effect for hip fracture surgery. Investigators hypothesized that the PENG block could be an interesting alternative to systemic analgesiscs for pain control after total hip replacement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the PENG block for intra and postoperative pain control in total hip arthroplasty.

it was a monocentric, randomized, controlled and double blind study. Patients scheduled for primary THA with lateral approach under general anesthesia.

Premedication with IV midazolam 1 to 2 mg on arrival to operating theatre. general anesthesia was conducted using fentanyl, propofol and cisatracurium for induction and isoflurane for maintanance patients were randomized using a random table in two groups:

  • PENG Block group (PG) who received 2 mg.kg-1Ropivacaine in 40 ml of saline.
  • Placebo group (SG) who received 40 ml of saline.

Postoperative analgesia started before extubation of the patient, with:

  • IV paracetamol 1g/6h in Day1 and oral paracetamol 1g/8h for 6 days.
  • non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs with IM piroxicam 20 mg on day one (at the end of surgery) and oral diclofenac 50 mg/12h for 3 days.
  • Morphine PCA for day 1 (24 H) and oral tramadol 50 mg/12h from day 2 to day 6.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tunis, Tunisia, 2010
        • Institut Kassab D'Orthopedie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary THA with lateral approach under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hip fracture,
  • allergy to local anesthetics,
  • peripheral neuropathy,
  • creatinin clearance inferior to 30ml/min,
  • weight inferior to 50 Kg or superior to 100 Kg,
  • neurological disorder affecting the lower extremity, significant psychiatric conditions,
  • patients receiving corticosteroid therapy,
  • chronic consumption of opioids (>2 months).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: PLACEBO
Pericapsular Nerve Group block with 40 ml saline
A curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5MHz) was initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the IPE, the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed. A 22-gauge, 100-mm needle was inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following negative aspiration, the saline solution was injected in 5-mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane.a total volune of 40 ml saline solution was injected.
Experimental: Pericapsular nerve group block
Pericapsular Nerve Group block with 2 mg.kg-1Ropivacaine in 40 ml of saline
A curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5MHz) was initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the IPE, the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed. A 22-gauge, 100-mm needle was inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following negative aspiration, local anesthetic was injected in 5-mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane. a 2 mg.kg-1Ropivacaine in 40 ml of saline was injected

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total morphine consumption
Time Frame: day one
morphine consumption on mg
day one

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraoperative opioid consumption
Time Frame: Day 0
total intraoperative fentanyl consumption on microg
Day 0
Pain score after extubation
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes
simplified numerical score (SNS) after extubation [0=no pain , 10=worst pain].
up to 30 minutes
postoperative pain score
Time Frame: day one
simplified numerical score (SNS) [0=no pain , 10=worst pain].
day one
Pain score during seating position
Time Frame: day one
simplified numerical score (SNS) during seating position [0=no pain , 10=worst pain].
day one

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: khaireddine Raddaoui, MD, Tunis El Manar University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Pericapsular nerve group block with saline solution

Subscribe