A Novel Augmented Reality System (ARssist) for the Assistant Surgeon in Robotic Assisted Surgery

January 21, 2024 updated by: Jeremy Yuen Chun TEOH, Chinese University of Hong Kong

A Novel Augmented Reality System (ARssist) for the Assistant Surgeon in Robotic Assisted Surgery: A Pilot Study

Robotic prostatectomy is a surgery for treating localized prostate cancer. The ARssist system is a novel augmented reality system designed for the assistant surgeon, allowing delivery of augmented reality information via Microsoft HoloLens 2 (a head mount display developed by Microsoft) to better delineate the 3-D operative environment and enable better visualization. To date, there is no prospective study on the clinical performance and utilization of the ARssist system. This study is to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of the ARssist system during robotic surgery with the da Vinci Xi system.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The da Vinci robotic surgery system offers advantages such as immersive three-dimensional visualization, intuitive control, and high degree of movement freedom to the chief surgeon. However, major surgery remains a team-based effort. Apart from the chief surgeon who remotely controls the da Vinci system at the console, the success of robotic assisted surgical procedures also relies on the assistant surgeon positioned at the patient side, who provides assistance laparoscopically. Throughout a robotic assisted operation, the patient side surgeon is responsible for tasks such as the exchange of instruments, retraction of tissue to enhance operative fields, manipulation of instruments, etc. Literature has demonstrated that the performance of the assistant surgeon has an effect on the outcomes of robotic surgery such as operative time.

Traditionally the patient side surgeon relies on the monitor mounted on the vision cart to guide his/her movement. The monitor provides real-time relay of the image captured from the endoscope, but does not provide the full three-dimensional stereo endoscopy view unless set up with specialized stereo-vision equipment. The position of the monitor is also often awkward, creating problems such as obstructed views and non-ergonomic positioning of the patient side surgeon to overcome the view obstruction. The complex three-dimensional set-up of endoscope, robotic instruments, and hand-held instruments inside the patient body could prove difficult to imagine from the patient side surgeon's perspective, and guesswork could be involved during transfer of instruments/objects towards the operative field as the hand-held instruments are often out of the visualized field of the endoscope.

Augmented reality (AR) technology delivered via optical see-through head-mounted display (OST-HMD) could potentially be the solution to the aforementioned issues. OST-HMD, such as Microsoft HoloLens, can superimpose computer graphics on top of real-world view through optical combiners. The clinical application of such a technology has been gaining interest in the surgical community, with preliminary study demonstrating feasibility of AR technology in ureteroscopic procedures.

The ARssist system is a novel AR system designed for the patient side surgeon in robotic assisted surgeries. It integrates the da Vinci surgical system and Microsoft HoloLens, and provides valuable AR information to the patient side surgeon including (i) three-dimensional real-time rendering of the endoscope, robotic instruments, and hand-held instruments within the patient body, and (ii) real-time stereo endoscopy that is configurable for the assistant surgeon's preferred hand-eye coordination. The ARssist system would in theory grant the patient side surgeon improved orientation and navigation of hand-held laparoscopic instruments, thus improving their laparoscopic performance and the performance of the surgery as a whole.

Based on the Innovation, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term Study (IDEAL) Collaboration group methodology of promoting surgical innovation and research through planned prospective studies within an established staged process, we propose a stage 1 (Innovation) study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the ARssist system.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old with informed consent
  • Suitable for minimally invasive surgery
  • Clinically diagnosed with urological conditions that are indicated for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy with or without lymph node dissection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2
  • Contraindication to general anaesthesia
  • Severe concomitant illness that drastically shortens life expectancy or increases risk of therapeutic intervention
  • Untreated active infection
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy
  • Presence of another malignancy or distant metastasis
  • Emergency surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ARssist system
The surgery will follow the same steps of a standard robotic assisted radical prostatectomy procedure, with the addition of the ARssist system used by the patient side surgeon.
As stated in ARssist system arm description

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-day complications
Time Frame: Thirty days after the allocated treatment
Complications which occur within 30 days after the operation
Thirty days after the allocated treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance parameters
Time Frame: Immediately post-operative
Performance of the patient side surgeon will be assessed using Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) by different evaluators, including the patient side surgeon him/herself (self-evaluation), the console surgeon, and a third-party evaluator
Immediately post-operative
Performance parameters
Time Frame: Immediately post-operative
The surgeries will be recorded audio-visually, with the captured video clips later reviewed by an independent assessor to determine objective performance outcomes of included tasks via motion analysis parameters
Immediately post-operative
User-generated usability feedbacks
Time Frame: Immediately post-operative
Specific feedback on the use of ARssist system will be collected from the patient side surgeon at the pre-operative and post-operative time points using a customized questionnaire of 10 items on a 5-point Likert scale
Immediately post-operative
Operating time
Time Frame: Immediately post-operative
Duration of operation
Immediately post-operative
Blood loss
Time Frame: Immediately post-operative
Volume of blood loss during operation
Immediately post-operative
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Three days after the allocated treatment
Patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy have an average hospital stay of three days
Three days after the allocated treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeremy Yuen Chun TEOH, MBBS, FRCSEd, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on ARssist system

Subscribe