- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04319042
Effect of Placing the Implant Crown on the Implant on the Same Day as the Implant vs. 4 Weeks Later.
Influence of the Implant Loading Protocol on Implant Survival in Early Placed Single-tooth Implants in Mandibular First Molar Sites Using Computer-assisted Implant Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background
Dental implants placed between 12 and 16 weeks after tooth loss are a well-documented treatment option. Placing the artificial tooth (implant crown) on the implant the same day (immediate loading) or approximately 4 weeks after implant placement (early loading) are also treatment options with good scientific documentation. Computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) and modern implant materials/surfaces increase treatment predictability and success in this context.
Clinical relevance
The timing of implant placement post-extraction and subsequent implant loading cannot be separated in modern implant therapy any longer. At the "Sixth ITI Consensus Conference" in Amsterdam, it was concluded that the clinical evidence and documentation of early implant placement combined with immediate or early implant loading in partially edentulous patients is currently insufficiently documented. However, this treatment protocol seems to be widely applied in daily practice. The planned study is designed to provide evidence for the application of early implant placement with partial bone-healing and either an immediate or an early loading protocol.
Hypothesis/Specific aims
H0: "Early placed single tooth implants by means of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) in mandibular first molar sites with immediately loaded provisionals, show a survival rate comparable to early placed implants with an early loading protocol." Secondary parameters to be evaluated will be the prosthetic survival/ success, patient-centered outcomes (PROs), clinical peri-implant conditions, bone-level changes, alteration of peri-implant soft-tissue dimensions and the accuracy of digital implant planning.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Simone FM Janner, PD Dr.
- Phone Number: +41316322566
- Email: ueberweiser.chir@zmk.unibe.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Samir Abou-Ayash, Dr.med.dent.
- Phone Number: +41316322586
- Email: ueberweiser.chir@zmk.unibe.ch
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bern, Switzerland, 3010
- Recruiting
- Klinik für Oralchirurgie und Stomatologie
-
Contact:
- Simone FM Janner, PD. Dr.
-
Bern, Switzerland, 3010
- Recruiting
- Klinik für rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin und Gerodontologie
-
Contact:
- Samir Abou-Ayash, Dr.med.dent.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 20 years
- Willingness to sign informed consent and to participate in the study
- Plaque index according to Silness and Loe of < 35% [26]
- Presence of a mandibular first molar that has to be extracted
- Sufficient vertical interocclusal space for the placement of an implant crown (7 mm)
- Presence of an opposing natural or artificial tooth
- Ridge height sufficient for the placement of a ≥ 10 mm-long implant
- Sufficient ridge width for the placement of a 4.1mm diameter implant
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any physical or mental disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene or the capability of providing written informed consent and compliance to the protocol
- Any disorder that would interfere with wound healing or represent a contraindication for implant surgery such as, but not limited to, uncontrolled diabetes or conditions resulting in or requiring immunosuppression, radiation, chemotherapy, frequent use of antibiotics or antiresorptive medication such as bisphosphonates
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Intention to become pregnant between inclusion and implant loading
- Heavy smoking habit with ≥ 10 cig/d
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits, present oro-facial pain
- Insufficient ridge width/height for the study implant
- Defect of any alveolar wall (secondary exclusion criterion at tooth extraction)
- ISQ < 70 (secondary exclusion criterion for Group A at implant placement, for Group B at loading visit)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Immediate Loading
Group A. The implant receives an artificial tooth the same day as it is placed.
|
The implant receives an artificial tooth the same day as it is placed.
|
Active Comparator: Early Loading
Group B. The implant receives an artificial tooth 4 weeks after placement.
|
The implant receives an artificial tooth 4 weeks after placement.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implant Survival
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number of implants from both groups (i.e. immediate loading vs. early loading) fulfilling the criteria of survival and success after 12 months. The criteria are:
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Prosthetic Success
Time Frame: 10 years
|
Esthetics and correct function of the implant prosthetic will be analyzed by means of palpation, inspection and probing.
Any prosthetic complication, e.g.
chipping, screw loosening will be recorded.
|
10 years
|
Patient's satisfaction
Time Frame: 10 years
|
Patient's satisfaction with the treatment result will be analyzed by means of questions (both oral and written, using validated questionnaires)
|
10 years
|
Clinical peri-implant soft tissue dimensions
Time Frame: 10 years
|
Probing depth of the soft tissue surrounding the implant will be assessed using palpation, inspection and a periodontal probe.
|
10 years
|
Crestal bone level
Time Frame: 10 years
|
Crestal bone-level changes will be assessed in the follow-up radiographs that are taken routinely after any implant treatment, using a dedicated imaging software.
|
10 years
|
Accuracy of digital implant planning
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The difference between digitally planned and real/final implant position will be analyzed by superimposing the digitized final impression and the digital preoperative planning with the dedicated software.
No additional exposure to radiation or additional impressions will be necessary.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: SImone FM Janner, PD Dr., University of Bern
- Principal Investigator: Samir Abou-Ayash, Dr.med.dent., University of Bern
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- ITI 1455_2019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Molar Requiring Extraction
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompletedThird Molar ExtractionFrance
-
Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical...Not yet recruiting
-
University of Santiago de CompostelaCompletedTooth Extraction | Third Molar Extraction | Oral PainSpain
-
Ahmad KutkutStraumann USAWithdrawnImmediate Placement of Straumann BLX Implants in Molar Extraction SocketsUnited States
-
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingImpacted Third Molar Tooth | Third Molar Extraction
-
Medical University of GrazCompletedThird Molar Extraction SurgeryAustria
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedThird Molar Extraction
-
Eurofarma Laboratorios S.A.WithdrawnThird Molar ExtractionBrazil
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedBad Molar Teeth Arrangement Requiring Orthodontic DeviceFrance
-
University of Padova, School of Dental MedicineCompletedPain | Oral Surgery | Third Molar ExtractionItaly
Clinical Trials on Immediate Loading
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompletedDental Implants | Edentulous Alveolar RidgeEgypt
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakCompleted
-
Fölktandvården Skåne ABCompleted
-
Fölktandvården Skåne ABCompletedOsseointegration Failure of Dental ImplantSweden
-
Medical University of GrazNeoss Ltd., Harrogate, UKCompletedEdentulous JawAustria
-
University of BelgradeEnrolling by invitation
-
Université de MontréalCompleted
-
KU LeuvenDentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedImplant Complication | Prosthesis Survival