Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Ageism

Testing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Relieving Nurses' Ageism Toward Older Adults

Background: Healthcare settings must be a patient-friendly environment for the investigator's older adults who are in an imperative need for compassionate healthcare when approaching their later life. However, older adults until this moment are experiencing age discriminative acts by nurses who are supposed to act in favor of their patients. Ageism is not always a result of either negative attitudes or misconceptions toward older adults, but to the innate fear of death where nurses perceive older adults as a powerful reminder of death. Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is well known for targeting psychological distresses, to date, no research has investigated its effectiveness in relieving nurses' death anxiety and ageism. This study examined the effectiveness of CBT to relieve nurses' death anxiety and ageism toward older adults.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted during August 2019 in the university hospital. A total of 110 nurses selected through proportional stratified sampling and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The intervention consisted of six two-hour training sessions delivered in five modules with the integration of different CBT exercises. The effect of CBT was assessed on measures of a series of validated questionnaires of study variables before and after the training sessions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Procedure After getting the IRB approval and completing the informed consent procedure, the researchers met with the administrator of the hospital to (1) discuss the inclusion criteria and obtain a list of eligible participants, (2) discuss the workflow of the study procedure, and (3) agree on the time/date of site visits to collect the data and run the CBT sessions based on the convenience of nurses and their work schedule. After having a list of all eligible nurses recorded in an excel sheet, the researcher randomly assigned the nurses into control and intervention groups using Excel's RAND function. After randomization was performed, the researchers distributed the pretest questionnaires to the nurses in both groups and asked them to drop the completed questionnaires in the designated box next to the front desk of their work department. Three days later the researchers collected the questionnaires.

Intervention The CBT intervention was carried out through six two-hour sessions over a month. The intervention group was divided into three subgroups of 18 to 19 nurses each. It was required for each subgroup to attend two CBT sessions to complete the intervention. The main objective of the CBT was to improve nurses' senses of self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, and symbolic immortality. The CBT was guided by the five-factor model, which extensively used within the context of CBT (Bagby, Gralnick, Al-Dajani, & Uliaszek, 2016). A detailed description of the model was discussed in previous recent studies (Bagby et al., 2016; Hawley et al., 2017). The model explains the interactions between beliefs, attitudes, emotions, and behaviors. The intervention emphasized on how nurses can reinforce and enhance their anxiety buffering system by an improved understanding of how unconscious realization of eventual mortality affects explicit attitudes. Throughout the intervention, nurses were trained about the five-factor model and therapeutic beliefs, emotions, attitudes, and behaviors pertinent to death anxiety. The differences between therapeutic and nontherapeutic coping strategies of death anxiety were identified and discussed with nurses in the intervention group.

The CB therapist followed the same structure in the delivery of each CBT session. The CBT session was delivered in five modules: generating objectives and outcomes, enhancing self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, changing beliefs regarding symbolic mortality, and changing attitudes regarding death anxiety. The CBT was tailored to meet the training needs of nurses based on the analysis of pretest questionnaire scores. The first session began with highlighting the objectives of the CBT. Then, a detailed presentation of the intervention modules was provided to the nurses with the integration of CBT exercises, including cognitive restructuring, graded exposure, mindfulness meditation, interpersonal skills training, and activity scheduling.

. At the end of the first session, the nurses were assigned to solve some homework questions relevant to the CBT exercises. The second session began with a brainstorming of the CBT training assignments from the first session. Then thoughts and understandings of training assignments and reflection on life stories or real experiences of alternative therapeutic behaviors were discussed. The CBT therapist was an experienced certified psychologist with a Ph.D. degree in Applied Psychology.

The nurses in the control group were divided into the same number of subgroups as the CBT nurses and trained by an experienced gerontological nurse who provided two consultations of 120 minutes for each subgroup. The main objective of the consultations was to instruct the nurses on how to deal with or care for older adults with respect and dignity as well as eliminate any ageist attitudes that they might have. The control group did not receive active advice or referrals to a psychologist or CBT therapist. During the consultations, the nurses received written and verbal information about the atypical presentation of illnesses and the most common misconceptions related to aging. The nurses in the control group had the opportunity to discuss and reflect on their own experiences in caring for older adults and other geriatric care-related issues. The consultations were nurse-centered, goal-oriented, and guided by nurses' questions. On the last day of the training for each group (intervention and control), the nurses were asked to fill out the posttest questionnaires and return them to the researchers.

Measures Outcome variables were measured twice; pre and posttest. The primary outcomes in the current were death anxiety and ageism, while the secondary outcomes self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, and symbolic immortality.

Primary Outcome Measures Death anxiety. Death anxiety was measured using The revised Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale (CL-FODS) (Lester & Abdel-Khalek, 2003). The CL-FODS is a 28-item scale measure death anxiety about four main aspects of death and dying, including: " your own death,"; "your own dying"; " the death of others,"; and " the dying of other". Each subscale has seven items answered on a 3-point intensity scale (ranged from 1= "no" to 5= "very"). The CL-FODS had very satisfactory reliability scores ranged from .88 to .93, and good internal consistency scores ranged from .74 to .90 in the original study. In the current study, the internal consistency reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha= 0.79) Ageism. The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA) (Fraboni et al., 1990) was used to measure nurses' ageist attitudes toward older adults. The FSA is a 29-item scale measuring the attitudinal and affective aspects of ageism. The FSA has three positive items (e.g., "Old people can be very creative"), which were reverse coded before calculating the total score. Each item of the FSA has four possible responses, including: "1= strongly disagree,"; "2= disagree,"; " 3=agree,"; and " 4= strongly agree". The possible range of the total score of the FSA is from 29 to 116. Higher scores indicate greater levels of ageist attitudes. The internal consistency reliability of the FSA in this study was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), which is very close to the original research (0.86) (Fraboni et al., 1990) Secondary Outcome Measures Self-esteem. Nurses' self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) (Rosenberg, 2015). The RSES has five positive (e.g., "I take a positive attitude toward myself") and five negatives (e.g., "I feel I do not have much to be proud of") items. The nurses responded to these items using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1= "strongly disagree" to 4= "strongly agree." The total score of the RSES was calculated after reverse coding of the negative items yielding a range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-esteem. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the RSES in this study was high (0.91) Interpersonal relationship. Nurses' interpersonal relationships were measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1980). The IRS has four subscales consisting of five positive and two negative items each. The subscales include perspective-taking, fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The nurses responded to the 28 items of IRS with five responses ranging from 0=" Does not describe me well" to 4= "describes me very well." The total score of the IRS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 0 to 112. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the IRI in this study was very good (0.81) Symbolic immortality. Symbolic immortality was measured using the Sense of Symbolic Immortality Scale (SSIS) (Drolet, 2007). The SSIS contains 11 negatives (e.g., nothing interesting happens in my life) and positive (e.g., I feel that I am doing what I want in life) items about areas of life showing the desire for symbolic immortality. The nurses responded to these items using a Likert scale of five choices ranging from 1 = "strongly disagree," to 5 = "strongly agree." The total score of the SSIS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 26 to130. Higher scores indicate a greater sense of symbolic immortality. The SSIS had good internal consistency in this study (Cronbach alpha = 0.86).

Other Measures Demographic questionnaire. The demographic data of nurses such as age, gender, level of education, years of clinical experience, marital status, and the number of older adults living in their households were collected by asking the nurses to fill out the demographic questionnaire.

Data Analysis IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for the analysis of all statistical tests in this study. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and frequency were used to describe the nurses' levels of self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, sense of symbolic immortality, death anxiety, and ageism as well as sociodemographic and professional characteristics. Independent t-tests were used for comparisons between the intervention and control groups in the main variables of interest. For comparisons between the pre and posttest scores of nurses in both groups, paired t-tests were used. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to examine the significant predictors of nurses' ageism. The order of entry of the variables into the regression model was based on their order in the TMT. Death anxiety was entered in the final step into the regression model as it is the main independent variable of ageism.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Irbid, Jordan, 22110
        • King Abdullah University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The eligible participants in this study were nurses caring for older adults and working in the hospital for at least one year of clinical experience.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nurses working in Pediatric, maternity, and psychiatric departments
  • Nurses with clinical experience less than one year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CBT Nurses
Interventional group

The CBT intervention was carried out through six two-hour sessions over a month. The intervention group was divided into three subgroups of 18 to 19 nurses each. It was required for each subgroup to attend two CBT sessions to complete the intervention.

The CB therapist followed the same structure in the delivery of each CBT session. The CBT session was delivered in five modules: generating objectives and outcomes, enhancing self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, changing beliefs regarding symbolic mortality, and changing attitudes regarding death anxiety. The first session began with highlighting the objectives of the CBT. Then, a detailed presentation of the intervention modules was provided to the nurses with integration of CBT exercises, including cognitive restructuring, graded exposure, mindfulness meditation, interpersonal skills training, and activity scheduling

No Intervention: Consultation Nurses
Control Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ageism
Time Frame: Two months
The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA) (Fraboni et al., 1990) was used to measure nurses' ageist attitudes toward older adults. The FSA is a 29-item scale measuring the attitudinal and affective aspects of ageism. The FSA has three positive items (e.g., "Old people can be very creative"), which were reverse coded before calculating the total score. Each item of the FSA has four possible responses, including: "1= strongly disagree,"; "2= disagree,"; " 3=agree,"; and " 4= strongly agree". The possible range of the total score of the FSA is from 29 to 116. Higher scores indicate greater levels of ageist attitudes. The internal consistency reliability of the FSA in this study was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), which is very close to the original research (0.86) (Fraboni et al., 1990)
Two months
Death anxiety
Time Frame: two Months
Death anxiety was measured using The revised Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale (CL-FODS) (Lester & Abdel-Khalek, 2003). The CL-FODS is a 28-item scale measure death anxiety about four main aspects of death and dying, including: " your own death,"; "your own dying"; " the death of others,"; and " the dying of other". Each subscale has seven items answered on a 3-point intensity scale (ranged from 1= "no" to 5= "very"). The CL-FODS had very satisfactory reliability scores ranged from .88 to .93, and good internal consistency scores ranged from .74 to .90 in the original study. In the current study, the internal consistency reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha= 0.79)
two Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
symbolic immortality
Time Frame: Two Months
Symbolic immortality was measured using the Sense of Symbolic Immortality Scale (SSIS) (Drolet, 2007). The SSIS contains 11 negatives (e.g., nothing interesting happens in my life) and positive (e.g., I feel that I am doing what I want in life) items about areas of life showing the desire for symbolic immortality. The nurses responded to these items using a Likert scale of five choices ranging from 1 = "strongly disagree," to 5 = "strongly agree." The total score of the SSIS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 26 to130. Higher scores indicate a greater sense of symbolic immortality. The SSIS had good internal consistency in this study (Cronbach alpha = 0.86).
Two Months
self-esteem
Time Frame: two Months
Nurses' self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) (Rosenberg, 2015). The RSES has five positive (e.g., "I take a positive attitude toward myself") and five negatives (e.g., "I feel I do not have much to be proud of") items. The nurses responded to these items using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1= "strongly disagree" to 4= "strongly agree." The total score of the RSES was calculated after reverse coding of the negative items yielding a range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-esteem. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the RSES in this study was high (0.91)
two Months
interpersonal relationship
Time Frame: two Months
Nurses' interpersonal relationships were measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1980). The IRS has four subscales consisting of five positive and two negative items each. The subscales include perspective-taking, fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The nurses responded to the 28 items of IRS with five responses ranging from 0=" Does not describe me well" to 4= "describes me very well." The total score of the IRS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 0 to 112. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the IRI in this study was very good (0.81)
two Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohammad Rababa, PhD, Jordan University of Science and Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ageism

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Subscribe