Written Exposure Therapy for Post-traumatic Stress Syndrome

May 27, 2021 updated by: Erik Andersson, Karolinska Institutet

A Feasibility Study for Written Exposure Therapy for Patients With Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in a Regular Health Care Setting

To investigate if written exposure therapy is feasible for patients with post-traumatic stress disorder

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A non-inferiority trial in JAMA Psychiatry showed that written exposure therapy (WET) was non-inferior to a gold standard CBT treatment. In comparison to other trauma-focused CBT protocols, WET generally demands less therapist-time, and specifically, less than half compared to CBT that consists of 12 weekly sessions á 60 minutes. The aim of this study is to translate and replicate these results in a Swedish context. This first step is a small feasibility trial which will guide a subsequent large-scale trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Karolinska Institutet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet criteria for PTSD.
  • If taking psychotropic medication, then the dose must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to study entry.
  • ≥ 18 years
  • Situated in Sweden
  • Be able to express themselves in Swedish, both in verbally and written form.
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other serious comorbidity as primary concern (ongoing substance dependence, untreated bipolar disorder, psychotic symptoms, severe depression, borderline personality disorder, high suicidal risk according to the MINI)
  • Ongoing CBT for trauma
  • Ongoing trauma-related threat (e.g. living with a violent spouse)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: written exposure therapy
The treatment consists of written exposure therapy (WET), which is manualized trauma-focused CBT in five sessions over 5 weeks.
The manual is based on established CBT interventions in trauma such as exposure. In short, the treatment is that the participant should be able to approach their intrusive memories and by doing this repeatedly, the memory will give rise to less discomfort.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline, week 5 and follow-up at 6 months
Change in symptoms of post traumatic stress from baseline to post treatment and follow up (6 months). The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of PTSD symptoms. All items are scored on a 0-4 scale. Higher score indicate worse severity
Time Frame: Baseline, week 5 and follow-up at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale - Self-report (MADRS-S)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline, week 5 and follow-up at 6 months
Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to post treatment and follow up (6 months). The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale - Self-report (MADRS-S) is a 9 item self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. All items are scored on a 0-6 scale. Higher score indicate worse severity.
Time Frame: Baseline, week 5 and follow-up at 6 months
Euroqol, EQ-5D
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline, week 5 and follow-up at 6 months
Change in overall health from baseline to post treatment and follow up (6 months). EQ-5D is a standardised self-report measure of overall health status measured in terms of five dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Mobility dimension asks about the person's walking ability. Self-care dimension asks about the ability to wash or dress by oneself, and usual activities dimension measures performance in "work, study, housework, family or leisure activities". In pain/discomfort dimension, it asks how much pain or discomfort they have, and in anxiety/depression dimension, it asks how anxious or depressed they are. The respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension using a three-level scale: 1 having no problems, 2 having some problems and 3 having extreme problems. A higher score indicate worse severity.
Time Frame: Baseline, week 5 and follow-up at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 27, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Case report form (CRF) data will be imputed to a data file. Analysis will be performed by members of the study-team and quality control and crosscheck will be performed by independent party.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on WET

Subscribe