Safety and Efficacy Study of Prefilled Liquid Etanercept(Yisaipu) for Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

Safety and Efficacy of Prefilled Liquid Etanercept(Yisaipu) for Active Ankylosing Spondylitis on the Basis of NSAID Therapy: A Multicenter Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Phase III Trial

This randomized, double-blind, phase III parallel-group non-inferiority study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of prefilled liquid etanercept (Yisaipu) versus lyophilized etanercept powder (Yisaipu) in active ankylosing spondylitis patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study carried out between March 6, 2014 and July 13, 2015 across multiple medical centers in China enrolled adult active ankylosing spondylitis patients aged between 18 and 65 years. Patients were randomized in a 3:1:1 ratio to receive twice weekly 25 mg prefilled liquid etanercept for totally 24 injections (group I) or once weekly 50 mg prefilled liquid etanercept for totally 48 injections (group II), or 25 mg twice weekly lyophilized etanercept powder for totally 48 injections (group III). The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved ASAS20 at week 24.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

640

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital clinical trial center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-65,male or female
  • Sign the informed consent
  • Fulfill the 1966 AS New York criteria for axial spondyloarthritis(SpA)
  • Active disease phase of SpA, defined as BASDAI≥4 or night back pain≥4 at screening
  • Inadequate response to NSAID≥4 week
  • Application of NSAID with stable dose for no less than 2 weeks at screening
  • Stable dose of prenisone for at least four weeks at ≤10mg per day if used at screening, or stop oral use for at least 4 weeks or stop local injection at least 12 weeks
  • Stable dose of any DMARD for at least four weeks if used at screening, or stop use for at least 4 weeks
  • Stop and receiving washing out for at least 4 week if receiving Chinese traditional drug for AS, physical treatment, vaccication or IVIG
  • Stop and receiving washing out for at least 12 week if receiving other biologics or other drug trials
  • The lab exam should achieve the criteria as below
  • Hb≥85g/L, 3.5×109/L≤WBC count≤10×109/L, PLT≥ lower limit of normal range, ALT≤2 fold of upper limit of normal range, serum creatine ≤upper limit of normal range. Negative pregnacy test for female patients. And promise to carry out contraception during the trial and 6 weeks after the trial is ended

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic condition or Allergic to IgG or any element of Yisaipu®
  • Clinical or radiographic evidence of Complete ankylosis of spine
  • Previous receiving TNF-a blockers therapy ≥3 months with poor response
  • Achieve any following tuberculosis criteria

    1. History of active tubercolosis, or radiographic evidence of present or previous history of pulmonary tubercolosis
    2. close contact with patients with tubercolosis, or with high risk of infection of tubercolosis such as immune suppression status
    3. Strong positive of PPD skin test with diameter ≥10mm. at screen or within 3 weeks prior to screen
  • Presence of acute infection or acute onset of chronic infection at screen
  • Invasive fungal infection or conditional infection within 6 months prior to screen
  • HBS-Ag or HBC-Ab positive at screen or history of HBS/HBC infection
  • History of infection on artifitial joints
  • Organ transplantation surgery within 6 months prior to screen
  • Presence of other autoimmune diseases, including IBD, psoriasis, uveitis, SLE, multiple sclerosis, etc.
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • History of malignancies within 5 years prior to screen, excluding complete resection of squamous cell carcinoma, or basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ.
  • AIDS or HIV infection
  • History of lymphoma or lymphoproliferative disorders
  • Presence of serious disorder of important organs or system
  • Presence of factors which may influence the compliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group I
twice weekly 25 mg prefilled liquid etanercept
Experimental: group II
once weekly 50 mg prefilled liquid etanercept
Active Comparator: group III
25 mg twice weekly lyophilized etanercept powder

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the proportion of patients who achieved ASAS20
Time Frame: at week 24
Axial SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) ASAS20 was defined as an improvement of at least 20% in at least three of the following four domains: 1) patient global assessment VAS, 2) nocturnal back pain and total back pain VAS, 3) Bath AS Function Index (BASFI) VAS, and 4) inflammation (mean of intensity and duration of morning stiffness components from the an improvement at least one unit relative to baseline VAS score; no worsening in the remaining fourth domain.
at week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the proportion of patients who achieved ASAS40, ASAS partial remission
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
Axial SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) ASAS40 was defined as improvement of at least 40% in at least three of the four abovementioned domains and an absolute improvement of at least two versus baseline VAS scores and no worsening versus the baseline in the remaining fourth domain. ASAS partial remission was defined as VAS scores ≤2 in each of the four abovementioned domains.
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved ASAS 5/6
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
Axial SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) ASAS 5/6 was defined as an improvement of at least 20% in at least five of the following six domains: 1) C-reactive protein (CRP), and 2) spinalmobility (scoliosis) in addition to the four above mentioned domains
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved the ASDAS clinically important and major improvement and inactive disease
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved BASDAI50
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) BASDAI50 was defined as a 50% or greater improvement versus the baseline BASDAI.
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved improvement in BASDAI
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
It was evaluated with a 6-question questionnaire,including: 1) fatigue; 2)spinal pain; 3) pain and swelling of peripheral joints; 4) pain at entheseal sites; 5) severity of morning stiffness and 6) duration of morning stiffness by using a single-item visual analog scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0-10 cm. After taking the answer of each question out of 10 , the BASDAI score was calculated by formula 0.2 [1+2+3+4+0.5(5+6)].
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved improvement in BASFI
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
Bath AS Function Index (BASFI)
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved improvement in BASMI scores
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is a combined measure of spinal mobility and hip function.Cervical rotation, tragus-wall distance, lateral lumbar flexion( the distance of the middle fingertip moves on the side of the thigh), anterior lumbar flexion(modified schober) , intermalleolar distance were measured. And according to the measurement result, each score with 0, 1, 2 points was recorded.
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved improvement in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
The (MASES) index based on 13 entheses. Enthesial sites assessed include the bilateral 1st costochondral joints(L and R), 7th costochondral joints(L and R), posterior superior iliac spines(L and R), anterior superior iliac spines(L and R), iliac crests(L and R), proximal insertion of Achilles tendons(L and R), and the 5th lumbar spinous process.The score of each part with 0 or 1 points was recorded.
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved improvement in nocturnal back pain and total back pain VAS
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
Nocturnal back pain and total back pain in the past week was assessed using a single-item visual analog scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0-10 cm, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented worst possible pain.
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved improvement in patient global assessment and physician global assessment
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
Patient global assessment (PGA,disease activity rated by the patient) was recorded on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, where 0 represented very good and 10 represented very worse. Physician global assessment (PhGA,disease activity rated by the physician) was recorded on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, where 0 defined as no disease activity state and 10 defined as most serious disease activity state .
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved improvement in number of swollen joints and number of tender joints
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
at weeks 12 and 24
the proportion of patients who achieved improvement in ESR and CRP
Time Frame: at weeks 12 and 24
at weeks 12 and 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AEs
Time Frame: at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
To assesse the safety
at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankylosing Spondylitis

Clinical Trials on prefilled liquid etanercept(Yisaipu)

Subscribe