PVP-I Nasal Sprays and SARS-CoV-2 Nasopharyngeal Titers (for COVID-19)

October 19, 2021 updated by: Stanford University

Effect of PVP-I Nasal Sprays vs Normal Saline Nasal Sprays on SARS-CoV-2 Nasopharyngeal Titers

The study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) containing nasal sprays as compared to isotonic saline nasal sprays in COVID-19 positive patients. The primary outcome measure is SARS-CoV-2 viral titers in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx. In vitro studies have shown PVP-I to be highly virucidal against the viruses which cause SARS and MERS. Additionally, clinical studies have shown PVP-I saline sprays to be well tolerated in human subjects. PVP-I oral rinses and sprays have been trialed as methods to reduce the incidence and symptoms of viruses which cause the "common cold."

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford Health Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of COVID-19 by lab test within 5 days of study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to "iodine," shellfish, or food dye
  • Receiving intranasal steroids
  • Sinus surgery within 30 days of beginning the study
  • Intubated at the time of enrollment
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in other COVID-19 studies - to be determined on a case by case basis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Povidone-Iodine 2%

Participants will administer PVP-I 2% nasal spray for 5 days. Nasopharyngeal swabs will be taken on Day 1 at baseline, Day 1 at four hours post-first dose, and Day 5.

Participants will complete a daily symptom journal from Day 1 through Day 5.

Two sprays to each nare of PVP-I 2% via nasal spray bottle, four times a day
Experimental: Povidone-Iodine 0.5%

Participants will administer PVP-I 0.5% nasal spray for 5 days. Nasopharyngeal swabs will be taken on Day 1 at baseline, Day 1 at four hours post-first dose, and Day 5.

Participants will complete a daily symptom journal from Day 1 through Day 5

Two sprays to each nare of PVP-I 0.5% via nasal spray bottle, four times a day
Placebo Comparator: Isotonic saline 0.9%

Participants will administer two sprays of isotonic saline nasal spray for 5 days. Nasopharyngeal swabs will be taken on Day 1 at baseline, Day 1 at four hours post-first dose, and Day 5.

Participants will complete a daily symptom journal from Day 1 through Day 5.

Two sprays to each nare of isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) via nasal spray bottle, four times a day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Cycle Threshold (Ct) Values Through Day 3 as a Measure of Change in Viral Titers of SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline), Day 1 (1 hour), Day 3

Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing was performed to determine the viral load in the nasopharynx.

Cycle threshold (Ct) denotes how many PCR cycles are required before the SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA reached a detectable level. Higher Ct values correspond to lower viral copy numbers. For reference, Ct values of 20 correspond to ~2.12 x 106 viral copies per milliliter, while a Ct value of 40 is undetectable and is considered the lower limit of detection of this RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2.

Day 1 (baseline), Day 1 (1 hour), Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Count of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events of Interest After Nasal Sprays
Time Frame: Assessed on days 3 and 5
Participants were asked on day 3 whether they experienced the adverse event since baseline, then asked on day 5 whether they experienced the adverse event since day 3 (collected by questionnaire). Adverse events of interest include: Nasal burning/pain, headaches, ear pain, sneezing, and nose bleeds.
Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of Participants Experiencing Fevers as a Measure of Frequency of Symptoms Related to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of participants that experienced fevers at either mild, moderate, or severe intensity. Participants were asked on day 3 whether they experienced the symptom since baseline, then asked on day 5 whether they experienced the symptom since day 3. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with "1" representing 'not experiencing that symptom,' "2" representing mild symptoms, "3" representing 'moderate symptoms,' and "4" representing 'severe symptoms.'
Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of Participants Experiencing Chills as a Measure of Frequency of Symptoms Related to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of participants that experienced chills at either mild, moderate, or severe intensity. Participants were asked on day 3 whether they experienced the symptom since baseline, then asked on day 5 whether they experienced the symptom since day 3. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with "1" representing 'not experiencing that symptom,' "2" representing mild symptoms, "3" representing 'moderate symptoms,' and "4" representing 'severe symptoms.'
Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of Participants Experiencing Fatigue as a Measure of Frequency of Symptoms Related to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of participants that experienced fatigue at either mild, moderate, or severe intensity. Participants were asked on day 3 whether they experienced the symptom since baseline, then asked on day 5 whether they experienced the symptom since day 3. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with "1" representing 'not experiencing that symptom,' "2" representing mild symptoms, "3" representing 'moderate symptoms,' and "4" representing 'severe symptoms.'
Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of Participants Experiencing Loss of Sense of Smell as a Measure of Frequency of Symptoms Related to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of participants that experienced loss of sense of smell at either mild, moderate, or severe intensity. Participants were asked on day 3 whether they experienced the symptom since baseline, then asked on day 5 whether they experienced the symptom since day 3. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with "1" representing 'not experiencing that symptom,' "2" representing mild symptoms, "3" representing 'moderate symptoms,' and "4" representing 'severe symptoms.'
Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of Participants Experiencing Loss of Sense of Taste as a Measure of Frequency of Symptoms Related to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of participants that experienced loss of sense of taste at either mild, moderate, or severe intensity. Participants were asked on day 3 whether they experienced the symptom since baseline, then asked on day 5 whether they experienced the symptom since day 3. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with "1" representing 'not experiencing that symptom,' "2" representing mild symptoms, "3" representing 'moderate symptoms,' and "4" representing 'severe symptoms.'
Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of Participants Experiencing Nasal Congestion as a Measure of Frequency of Symptoms Related to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of participants that experienced nasal congestion at either mild, moderate, or severe intensity. Participants were asked on day 3 whether they experienced the symptom since baseline, then asked on day 5 whether they experienced the symptom since day 3. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with "1" representing 'not experiencing that symptom,' "2" representing mild symptoms, "3" representing 'moderate symptoms,' and "4" representing 'severe symptoms.'
Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of Participants Experiencing Sore Throat as a Measure of Frequency of Symptoms Related to SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: Assessed on days 3 and 5
Count of participants that experienced sore throat at either mild, moderate, or severe intensity. Participants were asked on day 3 whether they experienced the symptom since baseline, then asked on day 5 whether they experienced the symptom since day 3. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with "1" representing 'not experiencing that symptom,' "2" representing mild symptoms, "3" representing 'moderate symptoms,' and "4" representing 'severe symptoms.'
Assessed on days 3 and 5
Compliance With Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: 5 days
Participants were asked to estimated doses completed at day 5 (0-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, or 76-100%). The count of participants who estimated their compliance to be within each range is reported.
5 days
Count of Participants Normosmia, Microsmia, or Anosmia as a Measure of Change in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline), Day 30
Participants scratch test cards and attempt to identify the smell from a multiple choice set of options. Their scores are then computed and categorized as normosmia (normal), mild, moderate, or severe microsmia (loss of smell), or anosmia (total loss of smell).
Day 1 (baseline), Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neelaysh Vukkadala, MD, Stanford University
  • Principal Investigator: Jayakar V. Nayak, MD, PhD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Povidone-Iodine 2%

Subscribe