Examination of the Relationship Between Foot - Body Posture and Balance and Gait in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

July 24, 2022 updated by: Güllü AYDIN YAĞCIOĞLU, Hacettepe University
Foot and body postures of patients with DMD will be evaluated. Foot structure characteristics such as foot length, metatarsal width, calcaneal valgus angle will be calculated for the foot posture. Also, the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) scale will be used. The body posture will be evaluated with the New York Posture Scale. Many gait characteristics such as step length, cadence, support surface of the patients will be determined with GaitRite instrumented walkway. Patients' balance assessment will be evaluated with Bertec Balance Advantage. The statistical analysis method will determine the relationship between foot and body posture and gait and balance.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sıhhiye
      • Ankara, Sıhhiye, Turkey, 06100
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population include just patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. To be between 5-13 years old
  2. Being at level I or II according to Brooke Lower Extremity Functional Classification Scale
  3. In the balance assessment, there should be at least 90 degrees of joint range of motion in the ankle to provide base contact on the force platform.
  4. Agree to participate in the research voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having serious mental and psychological problems,
  2. Failure to cooperate adequately with the physiotherapist making the evaluations,
  3. Severe contracture in lower extremities,
  4. Any injury and / or surgery of the lower extremities in the past 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait instrumented walkway (GaitRite)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The GAITRite® system mat was positioned on the floor and connected to a laptop computer, with a 2 m acceleration/deceleration walkway at either end. Subjects were asked to walk at their typical speed to the designated end of the walkway.
10 minutes
Bertec Balance System (Bertec)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The system consists of a 20 × 20-inch platform at ground level connected to a laptop computer. The balance plate detects body sway based on the pressure that the subject's feet apply to the plate surface. For testing, each subject stood for 10 seconds under 4 different testing conditions. The first two conditions were eyes open and eyes closed on the balance plate itself, defined as normal stability - eyes open (NSEO) and normal stability - eyes closed (NSEC). These were followed by the patient standing on a 4-inch thick foam rubber pad while on the balance plate. These were labeled as perturbed stability - eyes open (PSEO) and perturbed stability - eyes closed (PSEC). The primary measure assessed by the balance plate for each condition was maximum center of pressure excursion or COP (a distance measured in inches of the major axis of an ellipse calculated along the axis of maximum excursion).
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Foot Posture Index - 6
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The Foot Posture Index - 6 (FPI-6) was evaluated with each child standing and using the original protocol. FPI-6 values ranged from -2 to +2 for each of the six criteria and from -12 to +12 for the total score, indicative of position of each foot along the supinated to pronated continuum of foot posture.
10 minutes
NewYork Posture Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The assessment of posture was done by New York Posture Rating Scale in which subjects were asked to stand in position of comfort and look forward on the wall at their eye level in order to establish a level head position. Then the plumb line was kept slightly anterior to right malleolus for assessing posture in sagittal plane and at midpoint between the feet for assessing in the frontal plane. Scoring is done as 5, 3, 1 for no deviation, some deviation and marked deviation respectively for each 13 criteria in the rating scale of which components are head, shoulder, spine, hip, feet, arches in the frontal plane and head, chest, shoulder, upper back, trunk, abdomen and low back in the sagittal plane.
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gait Disorders, Neurologic

Clinical Trials on observational evaluation

3
Subscribe