A Water-based Sequential Preparatory Approach and Stroke

April 23, 2020 updated by: Marco Tramontano, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

A Water-based Sequential Preparatory Approach Versus Conventional Aquatic Training in Stroke Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial With a One-month Follow-up

Many studies hypothesize that people who have suffered stroke could benefit from water-based exercises to improve their strength and ability to perform the activities of daily living.

A Cochrane Review systematically synthesized and compared the effects of aquatic and land-based therapies on the activities of daily living (ADL) of patients following stroke and found that water-based exercises improved strength and ADL. A recent review indicates that RCTs comparing aquatic methods in both environments are lacking. The same movements in water and on dry land that target postural stability and gait require different competences. For example, the postural instability that occurs while squatting in water was enacted on land by sitting on a therapy ball. Furthermore, land-based conventional rehabilitation is generally task oriented, customized and challenging and follows a specific preparatory sequence of exercises according to patients' disabilities. Therefore, the investigators believe that a sequential preparatory approach (SPA), based on increasing difficulty and following a specific sequence of preparatory exercises (from the simplest to the most complex), should also be used in an aquatic environment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rm
      • Roma, Rm, Italy, 00179
        • Santa Lucia Foundation I.R.C.C.S.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke with unilateral hemiplegia within the previous six months;
  • Ability to walk without any device or need of continuous physical assistance to support body weight or maintain balance (Functional Ambulation Classification ≥ 3);
  • Acclimatization to water.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Cognitive deficits affecting the ability to understand task instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination > 24);
  • Severe unilateral spatial neglect (diagnosed with a test battery that included the Letter Cancellation test, Barrage test, Sentence Reading test and the Wundt-Jastrow Area Illusion Test);
  • Severe aphasia (diagnosed by means of neuropsychological assessment);
  • Presence of other neurological diseases;
  • Presence of cutaneous and mycosis infections;
  • Presence of open wounds, eczema, skin ulcers, decubitus lesions, severe burns;
  • Presence of PEG (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy);
  • Presence of tracheostomy;
  • Urinary incontinence;
  • Presence of otitis
  • Presence of orthopedic or cardiac comorbidities that would limit participation in the experimental and conventional training (all of which were clinically evaluated).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: experimental
8 individual experimental rehabilitation sessions as outpatients (2 days/week, 4 weeks), in a rehabilitation pool at Fondazione Santa Lucia Neurorehabilitation hospital. Each session lasted 45minutes. The water temperature was between 30°C and 32°C.

The experimental training consists of a sequential and a preparatory approach aimed at enhancing dynamic postural stability. The exercises followed a specific sequence starting from a kneeling position, proceeding to a sitting position and ending with a supine position. Step exercises preparatory for gait were performed using a step and two floating aids. Gait exercises were performed first with the upper limbs placed on two floating aids and then during a dual motor task (i.e., catching a ball thrown by the therapist).

The control aquatic therapy consists of water-based exercises, in line with suggestions of the Hydrotherapy Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Guidance on Good Practice in Hydrotherapy.

These consisted of warm-up exercises, stretching exercises for the lower limbs, recruitment exercises and walking exercises during each phase of gait (single stance, swing and double stance).

ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: control
8 individual of standard aquatic rehabilitation sessions as outpatients (2 days/week, 4 weeks), in a rehabilitation pool at Fondazione Santa Lucia Neurorehabilitation hospital. Each session lasted 45minutes. The water temperature was between 30°C and 32°C.

The experimental training consists of a sequential and a preparatory approach aimed at enhancing dynamic postural stability. The exercises followed a specific sequence starting from a kneeling position, proceeding to a sitting position and ending with a supine position. Step exercises preparatory for gait were performed using a step and two floating aids. Gait exercises were performed first with the upper limbs placed on two floating aids and then during a dual motor task (i.e., catching a ball thrown by the therapist).

The control aquatic therapy consists of water-based exercises, in line with suggestions of the Hydrotherapy Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Guidance on Good Practice in Hydrotherapy.

These consisted of warm-up exercises, stretching exercises for the lower limbs, recruitment exercises and walking exercises during each phase of gait (single stance, swing and double stance).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Berg Balance Scale at 2 months
Time Frame: at 2 months
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline at 2 months. BBS values ranging from 0 to 56, where 0 means the lowest level of function and 56 the highest
at 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke Specific Quality Of Life Scale (SS-QOL)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training
Change of Stroke Specific Quality Of Life Scale (SS-QOL) from baseline at 4 weeks of training and at 4 weeks after the end of the training. SS-QOL values ranging from 0 to 245, where 0 means the worse outcome and 245 the best one.
baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training
Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training
Change of Modified Barthel Index (MBI) from baseline at 4 weeks of training and at 4 weeks after the end of the training. MBI values ranging from 0 to 105, where 0 means the worse outcome and 105 the best one.
baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training
Tinetti Balance and Gait Scale (TBG)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training
Change of Tinetti Balance and Gait Scale (TBG) from baseline at 4 weeks of training and at 4 weeks after the end of the training. TBG values ranging from 0 to 28, where 0 means the worse outcome and 28 the best one.
baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training
Change of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) from baseline at 4 weeks of the training and at 4 weeks after the end of the training. MAS values ranging from 0 to 5, where 0 means the best outcome and 5 the worse one.
baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco Tramontano, Santa Lucia Foundation I.R.C.C.S.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Water-based Sequential Preparatory Approach

3
Subscribe