Study on Efficacy and Safety of Divaza in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia and Cognitive Disorders (DIAMANT)

March 9, 2021 updated by: Materia Medica Holding

All-Russian Observational Non-interventional Study on Efficacy and Safety of Divaza in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia and Cognitive Disorders

An open-label, prospective, observational, multicenter study. The study enrolls adult outpatients with CCI from 8 federal districts of the Russian Federation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Medical data (demographic and clinical characteristics - diagnosis, MoCA test results) are collected from patients to whom Divaza is prescribed to be taken according to the following regimen: 2 tablets 3 times per day for 12 weeks.

Neurologists assess the patients' cognitive functions with MoCA scale before starting therapy with Divaza (visit 1) and 12 weeks after the treatment (visit 2).

The efficacy of Divaza for the treatment of cognitive impairment in patients with chronic cerebral ischemia (CCI) is evaluated.

Safety is assessed based on the frequency and severity of adverse events. In addition, the relationship between MoCA test performance and gender or regional social and economic factors is evaluated.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2583

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult CCI outpatients with cognitive impairment (MoCA score <26) or without one (MoCA score ≥ 26) recieving unchanged basic therapy of CCI and underlying vascular disease for a 3 month previous to the onset of the study. Diagnosis of сhronic cerebral ischemia (CCI) was based on the clinical history of underlying vascular disease(atherosclerosis and/or arterial hypertension) and neurological signs. Vascular nature of cognitive impairment in patients with MoCA<26 was determined according to NINDS-AIREN criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients of either gender aged 18+ years.
  2. Diagnosis of chronic cerebral ischemia (CCI) based on the clinical history of underlying vascular disease(atherosclerosis and/or arterial hypertension) and neurological signs.
  3. Unchanged basic therapy of CCI and underlying vascular disease for a previous 3 month.
  4. Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other neurological diseases.
  2. Any known allergy to/intolerance of any constituent of the medication.
  3. Pregnancy, breast-feeding.
  4. Participation in other clinical trials for 3 months prior to enrollment in this study.
  5. The patient is related to the research personnel of the investigative sites that are directly involved in the study, or is the immediate relative of the investigator, or the employee of OOO NPF Materia Medica Holding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Divaza
Oral administration. 2 tablet 3 times daily. Keep the tablets in the mouth until completely dissolved, outside of meal.
Oral administration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean MoCA Score at Week 1 and the End of the 12-week Therapy
Time Frame: week 1 to 12 week
MoCA - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0-30 scores, higher scores mean a better outcome).MoCA test allows to evaluate the presence of cognitive impairment
week 1 to 12 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Patients With a MoCA Score <26 at 12 Week
Time Frame: 12 week
The number of patients with mild cognitive impairment. MoCA - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0-30 scores, higher scores mean a better outcome)
12 week
The Number of Patients With a MoCA Score ≤ 17 at the End of the 12-week Therapy
Time Frame: week1 to week 12
The number of patients with dementia. MoCA - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0-30 scores, higher scores mean a better outcome)
week1 to week 12
The Dynamics of Mean MoCA Score in Each Age Group
Time Frame: week1 to week 12
Age groups:young <35 yo, middle-aged - 35-59 yo, elderly - 60-75 yo, senile - 75-90 yo MoCA - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0-30 scores, higher scores mean a better outcome)
week1 to week 12
The Number of Patients With a MoCA Score Improvement (Increase in Scores) in Age Groups
Time Frame: week1 to week 12
Age groups:young <35 yo, middle-aged - 35-59 yo, elderly - 60-75 yo, senile - 75-90 yo MoCA - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0-30 scores, higher scores mean a better outcome)
week1 to week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Relationship Between Cognitive Impairment and Patients' Gender
Time Frame: Data measured at baseline
Evaluation of the relationship between baseline MoCA test results and gender. MoCA - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0-30 scores, higher scores mean a better outcome)
Data measured at baseline
The Relationship Between Cognitive Impairment and Regional Social/Economic Factors
Time Frame: Data measured at baseline

Evaluation of the relationship between baseline MoCA test results and regional developmental social or economic indicators (poverty, infant mortality, migration, life expectancy, innovation rate, professional development, number of university students, number of R&D personnel, resources spent on R&D, number of doctors, number of hospitals and outpatient clinics, hospital capacity, fertility rate, quality of life index,income).

Relevance of factors (unitless value) provided. The higher the more influential the factor is.

Relevance was assessed with Boruta approach:

KURSA, Miron B.; RUDNICKI, Witold R.. Feature Selection with the Boruta Package. Journal of Statistical Software, [S.l.], v. 36, Issue 11, p. 1 - 13, sep. 2010. ISSN 1548-7660. Available at: <http://www.jstatsoft.org/v036/i11>. Date accessed: 24 nov. 2020. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i11.

Data measured at baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Cerebral Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Divaza

Subscribe