Dual-Task Training With Different Priority Instructional Sets on the Gait Parameters in Patients With Chronic Stroke

November 21, 2018 updated by: AMIR IQBAL, King Saud University

Dual-Task Training With Variable Priority Instructional Sets Improve the Gait Parameters in Patients With Chronic Stroke

Balance is controlled through a complex process involving sensory, visual, vestibular and cerebral functioning which get affected by various neurological disorders such as in stroke. Different types of exercises are designed to target to cope up with the imbalance developed due to these neurological disorders. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dual-task training using two different priority instructional sets in improving gait parameters such as self-selected velocity, fast speed, step length, and stride length in chronic stroke patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Balance is controlled through a complex process involving sensory, visual, vestibular and cerebral functioning which get affected by various neurological disorders such as in stroke. Different types of exercises are designed to target to cope up with the imbalance developed due to these neurological disorders. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dual-task training using two different priority instructional sets in improving gait parameters such as self-selected velocity, fast speed, step length, and stride length in middle cerebral artery chronic stroke patients. A total of thirty middle cerebral artery chronic stroke patients were recruited on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria and equally allocated into two groups. Group 1 received dual-task training with fixed priority instructional sets for four weeks and group 2 received dual-task training with variable priority instructional sets for four weeks. The outcome was assessed using a 10-meter walk test and the comparison of footprints on the walkway paper before and after training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11433
        • Rehabilitation Research Chair

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosed case of middle cerebral artery chronic stroke made by a neurologist and verified using CT/MRI
  • Exhibited the age between 45 and 65 years
  • Ability to walk 10 meters without assistance
  • Their stroke onset within 12 months prior to the study and
  • Scored greater than 24 on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants had neurological conditions other than stroke
  • Uncontrolled hearing or visual and vestibular impairment
  • Took more than 15 seconds on Timed Up & Go (TUG) test
  • Had lower extremity amputation
  • A case of diagnosed speech-language impairment (not able to respond verbally to auditory stimuli) by a speech-language pathologist and noticed their concurrent participation in another clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dual-task Training Fixed Priority

Dual-task Training with fixed priority instructional set for four weeks. Balance training sessions of 45 minutes per day, 3 times a week for four weeks, so as to complete 9-12 hours of training warm-up improve the balance performance. This included 12 repetitions in each session for 30 minutes after a 10-minutes warm up.

Attention was focused on both postural and cognitive tasks throughout this session. In postural tasks, subjects were instructed to perform the following: walk narrow base of support with a cognitive task of counting backward by three walk narrow base of support with cognitive task of count forward by three, walk narrow base of support, step, sideways, backward avoiding the obstacles (holding a basket) with cognitive task to remember words.

Dual-task training fixed priority instructional set for four weeks. Balance training sessions of 45 minutes per day, 3 times a week for four weeks, so as to complete 9-12 hours of training warm-up improve the balance performance. This included 12 repetitions in each session for 30 minutes after a 10-minutes warm up.

Attention was focused on both postural and cognitive tasks throughout this session. In postural tasks, subjects were instructed to perform the following: walk narrow base of support with a cognitive task of counting backward by three walk narrow base of support with cognitive task of count forward by three, walk narrow base of support, step, sideways, backward avoiding the obstacles (holding a basket) with cognitive task to remember words.

Active Comparator: Dual-task Training Variable Priority

Dual-task Training with variable priority instructional set for four weeks. Balance training sessions of 45 minutes per day, 3 times a week for four weeks, so as to complete 9-12 hours of training warm-up improve the balance performance. This included 12 repetitions in each session for 30 minutes after a 10-minutes warm up.

During the first half of the training session, attention was focused on postural tasks, while during the remaining half of the session, attention was focused on cognitive tasks.

Dual-task training variable priority instructional set for four weeks. Balance training sessions of 45 minutes per day, 3 times a week for four weeks, so as to complete 9-12 hours of training warm-up improve the balance performance. This included 12 repetitions in each session for 30 minutes after a 10-minutes warm up.

During the first half of the training session, attention was focused on postural tasks, while during the remaining half of the session, attention was focused on cognitive tasks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10-meter walk test
Time Frame: Change from Baseline 10-meter Walk Test scores at 4-Weeks
It is used to evaluate gate parameters such as gait velocity (self-selected velocity and fast velocity, step length and stride length ) in patients with chronic stroke.
Change from Baseline 10-meter Walk Test scores at 4-Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) or Folstein test
Time Frame: Before the study intervention
It is used to to determine any impaired cognition that would affect the ability of the participant with stroke to follow instructions.
Before the study intervention
Timed Up & Go (TUG) test
Time Frame: Before the study intervention
It is used to identify the patient's mobility with respect to healthy elderly subjects, such as the gait parameters and walking endurance in subjects with chronic stroke.The TUG score correlates with gait speed, balance, functional level, ability to go out, and this score can change over time.
Before the study intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: AMIR IQBAL, MPT, Rehabilitation Research Chair

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Dual-task Training Fixed Priority

3
Subscribe