Construction of a Composite Clinical-echo Score Predictive of a Risk of Short-term Aggravation of Respiratory Impairment in Patients Suspected of Covid-19 (VIRUS)

February 23, 2021 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

With the influx of patients suspected of Covid-19 and the limited number of hospital beds, there is a need for sensitive triage to detect patients at risk of pulmonary complications and therefore requiring hospitalization, but also specific triage to safely discharge patients without risk factors or signs of clinical or ultrasound severity. The use of pulmonary ultrasound in addition to clinical assessment seems appropriate. Indeed, it allows early detection of signs of pneumopathy which, in the current context, most often correspond to Covid-19. These signs include B-lines, which indicate interstitial pulmonary oedema, and an anfractuous and thickened pleural line, or even centimetric parenchymal condensations with a low level of pleural effusion. Conversely, the presence of a medium to large pleural effusion is not very suggestive of the diagnosis of Covid-19. In addition, a lung ultrasound score has been developed and validated to assess the severity of acute respiratory distress and predict the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome. It is based on the performance of a 12-point (6 per hemi-thorax) pulmonary ultrasound with the collection of the presence of B-lines, condensation or pleural effusion. In the hands of a trained operator, this examination takes only a few minutes.

The aim of the study is to develop a score based on clinical and ultrasound evidence to allow early and safer referral than that based on clinical evidence alone. To do this, the study will retrospectively collect clinical and lung ultrasound data from departments that use this technique on a daily basis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of the VIRUS research is therefore to develop an innovative clinical-echo score (VIRUScore), based on risk factors, clinical elements and ultrasound data. This predictive score corresponds to a probabilistic measure of the individual risk of aggravation and is intended to become the cornerstone of a decision-making algorithm for triaging/managing COVID-19 patients (VIRUS algorithm). Initial VIRUScore and evolution of clinical and/or clinico-biological signs will thus have to arbitrate different patient pathway scenarios with 2 major objectives: first, to reduce hospital tension and desaturate emergency departments and COVID-19 units to ensure maximum monitoring of moderate forms, some of which are likely to evolve towards severe forms. The negative predictive value of severe short-term aggravation (H48) should therefore be maximized for these patient profiles invited to return home and/or transfer to non-specialized hospitals or clinics. And secondly, it should be sensitive in detecting and predicting the most severe forms with a high risk of resuscitative escalation and/or death, allowing prioritization (access to CT, access to research protocols) and grading the intensity of clinical surveillance, for anticipation of resuscitative resources.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

313

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France
        • Chu de Nantes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The target population for VIRUS corresponds to all patients admitted to Emergency Departments on suspicion of COVID-19 (established by primary care professionals or during regulation by the EMS).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted and managed in an emergency department under suspicion of COVID-19 who received a pleuro-pulmonary ultrasound on admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted and treated in an Emergency Department for suspected COVID-19 but who did not receive a pleuro-pulmonary ultrasound on admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient with suspected COVID-19 infection
Patients admitted and managed in an emergency department under suspicion of COVID-19 infection who received a pleuro-pulmonary ultrasound on admission
pulmonary ultrasound on admission

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Construction of a composite clinical-echo score (VIRUScore) predictive of risk of worsening respiratory impairment in COVID-19 adult patients admitted to the Emergency Department
Time Frame: 48 hours post-admission
Multivariate model predictive of clinical worsening of respiratory impairment within 48 hours post-admission : intubation, oxygenotherapy, need of vasoactive drugs, worsening of state,age, gender, body surface, LUScore (pulmonary ultrasound), FiO2, need of ventral decubitus, risk factor (obesity, asthma...), time from the beginning of the first symptoms
48 hours post-admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the prognostic performance of the VIRUScore on the risk of pulmonary aggravation
Time Frame: 48 hours post-admission
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of VIRUScore on risk of pulmonary aggravation
48 hours post-admission
Evaluate the prognostic performance of the VIRUScore on the risk of severe pulmonary aggravation defined by resuscitation admission and/or death at D14 (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value).
Time Frame: 14 days post-admission
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of VIRUScore on the risk of severe pulmonary aggravation defined by resuscitation admission and/or death.
14 days post-admission
Construction of a decisional algorithm for triage and management of COVID-19 patients.
Time Frame: 14 days post-admission
Research of VIRUScore cut-off values maximizing the negative predictive value and construction of a decisional algorithm maximizing returns home and transfers to non-specialized hospitals or clinics without loss of individual chance.
14 days post-admission
Search for "ultrasound signature" (lung fields and/or severity of involvement) associated with mild (return home) vs. moderate (oxygen therapy) vs. severe (resuscitation/death) clinical forms.
Time Frame: 14 days post-admission
Search for "Ultrasound signature" (lung fields and/or severity of damage) associated with mild vs. moderate (oxygen therapy) vs. severe (resuscitation/death) clinical forms.
14 days post-admission
Evaluate the analytical concordance between the pulmonary ultrasound (LUScore) and the Gold-standard CT-scan (CT score)
Time Frame: 14 days post-admission
Diagnostic concordance of the LUScore and CT score with the severity grades defined by the French Radiology Society
14 days post-admission
Construction of a score predictive of aggravation in the sub-population of patients returned home
Time Frame: 14 days post-admission
Predictive Score for Aggravation in Patients Returned Home
14 days post-admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on pulmonary ultrasound

Subscribe