Continuous Passive Motion Following Fixation of Pelvic and Knee Fractures

April 28, 2026 updated by: H. Claude Sagi, MD, University of Cincinnati

The Role of Continuous Passive Motion in Pain Control of Patients Undergoing Operative Management of Isolated Acetabular Fractures, Supracondylar Femur Fractures, or Tibial Plateau Fracture: A Comparative Study

The investigators will directly compare the visual analog scale scores and narcotic pain medication requirements in the patients who have continuous passive motion (CPM) versus those who do not during the course of the hospital admission following an open reduction internal fixation surgery for acetabular fracture, supracondylar femur fracture, or a tibial plateau fracture.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective comparative cohort study analyzing the practices of three surgeons, one of whom routinely uses CPM following fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures, and two surgeons who do not.

All patients, over the age of 18 years who have undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of isolated acetabular fractures, supracondylar femur fractures, or tibial plateau fracture will be asked to participate. Those who consent will be randomized into two groups. The experimental group will have a CPM applied in the PACU immediately post-op and it will be utilized while the patient is awake in bed for 2 hours on and 2 hours off, when not mobilizing with Physical Therapy (PT). The experimental group will also have traditional PT, including sessions 1 to 3 times a week. The control group will have typical care, including working with physical therapy 1 to 3 times a week. The investigators will directly compare the VAS scores and narcotic pain medication requirements in the patients who have CPM versus those who do not during the course of the hospital admission. VAS scores will be assessed throughout the day by RN and/or PT. Functional outcomes will be assessed at the one-year mark using the Iowa and Majeed pelvic functional outcome tools along with the SF-12. Orthopedic Resident or Nurse Clinical will check the patient for incision integrity each day and each session of using the CPM, the patient will be monitored for adverse events. Data will be collected using Epic.

The investigators will record patient demographics including age, sex, and pre-existing narcotic usage. Fracture type according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association will be recorded. VAS scores and pain medication requirements will be recorded from the first 48 hours during the patient's stay. Pain scores and CPM use will be obtained from Epic using the flowsheet.

Functional outcomes will be assessed at the one-year mark using the Iowa and Majeed pelvic functional outcome tools along with the SF-12.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Kimberly A Hasselfeld, MS
  • Phone Number: 513-558-1933
  • Email: hasselky@uc.edu

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • Recruiting
        • Univrsity of Cincinnati Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Henry Sagi, MD
          • Phone Number: 5137776213
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or greater
  • Isolated acetabular fractures, supracondylar femur fractures, or tibial plateau fracture
  • Have undergone operative intervention for fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injury to either lower extremity that affects the patient's ability to weight bear
  • Under the age of 18
  • Pregnant
  • A prisoner

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CPM
The experimental group will have a CPM applied in the PACU immediately post-op and it will be utilized while the patient is awake in bed for 2 hours on and 2 hours off, when not mobilizing with Physical Therapy (PT). The experimental group will also have traditional PT, including sessions 1 to 3 times a week.
CPM-continuous passive motion device.
No Intervention: No CPM
The control group will have typical care, including working with physical therapy 1 to 3 times a week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS Pain Score
Time Frame: Visual Analog Score for pain will be recorded daily after the surgery each day until the patient is discharged or up to 365 days..
Pain will be assessed by the patient on a scale of 1-10 during hospitalization. 1=no pain; 10=worst pain
Visual Analog Score for pain will be recorded daily after the surgery each day until the patient is discharged or up to 365 days..

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SF-12
Time Frame: This score will be completed at the one-year post-operative visit.
The Short Form 12 (SF-12) uses just 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. An algorithm is used to generate the physical and mental health composite scores for comparison to normative data. The mean score is set to 50. Scores >50 indicate better physical or mental health than to mean. Scores <50 indicate worse physical or mental health than the mean.
This score will be completed at the one-year post-operative visit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Henry C Sagi, MD, University of Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OS19088 IRB 2019-0541

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fractures, Bone

Clinical Trials on CPM

Subscribe