RCT to Compare Restrata and NPWT to Heal Complex DFUs

July 20, 2023 updated by: Larry Lavery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Restrata and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) to Heal Complex Diabetic Foot Wounds

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Restrata compared to Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) to heal complex diabetic foot wounds.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Screening

  1. Explain purpose and nature of the study and obtain signature on the informed consent document.
  2. Screen the subject against protocol inclusion and exclusion criteria, including all pertinent tests, including pregnancy test if needed.

Baseline (may be done as same day as screening procedures)

  1. Obtain general medical history and demographic information and social history
  2. Complete a physical examination, body weight, height, and vital signs, including measurement of resting heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure while seated.
  3. Select target study ulcer
  4. Obtain complete history pertinent to DFU disease including duration of the target ulcer, previous and current treatment.
  5. Perform debridement and obtain tissue collection (3 tissue and 1 bone if applicable).
  6. Perform standardized photography and measurement of the study wound (eKare or available camera with ruler). Assess the post-debridement ulcer area (cm2), perimeter (cm), and greatest depth (cm) using the inSight device (eKare, Fairfax, VA).
  7. Perform hyperspectral imaging of dorsal and plantar aspects of the foot.
  8. Perform neuropathy assessment (monofilament, VPT)
  9. Skin perfusion pressure (Sensilase)
  10. Collect all relevant concomitant medication (antibiotics, steroids, and diabetes medications)
  11. Complete questionnaires
  12. Place Restrata and dress wound or apply NPWT therapy.
  13. Submit subject stipend

Therapy/Treatment Phase

Study Visit 1-11:

  1. Assess target ulcer (if wound has closed, document as such, skip to END OF STUDY VISIT (EOS).
  2. Document time on/off NPWT if applicable.
  3. If Restrata is removed, assess the ulcer area (cm2), perimeter (cm), and greatest depth (cm) using the inSight device - if the wound is deemed healed by the physician, skip to EOS visit.
  4. Perform hyperspectral imaging of the dorsal and plantar aspects of the foot if wound is active or healed.
  5. Debride wound if indicated. Re-measure wound if surgical debridement is performed prior to dressing the wound
  6. Collect all relevant concomitant medication.
  7. If wound is not healed, redress the wound with Restrata dressing (if removed for debridement) or NPWT.
  8. Disburse subject stipend
  9. Note: at week 3, if wound is not ready for surgical closure, remove Restrata and replace with new piece of Restrata (per randomization schedule)
  10. Assess for AE/SAEs and/or follow up on previous AE/SAEs.

Study Visit Closed

  1. When a study wound has closed, we will perform the EOS evaluation.
  2. If a wound has closed, the patient will enter the follow-up phase of the study.

Study Visit 12/EOS:

  1. If the study wound closes prior to the 12-week study mark, subjects will perform EOS visit at the time of wound closure.
  2. Assess target ulcer.
  3. If wound has not closed, assess the ulcer area (cm2), perimeter (cm), and greatest depth (cm) using the inSight device.
  4. Perform hyperspectral imaging of the dorsal and plantar aspects of the foot if wound is active or healed.
  5. If wound has not closed, redress the wound per physician-directed standard of care.
  6. Perform EOS visit documentation
  7. Complete questionnaires
  8. Follow up on AE/SAEs that have not yet been resolved.

Study Visit Follow-up

1. If the wound heals during the treatment phase or if the wound is not healed after 12 weeks, data from their electronic medical record will be evaluated to identify healing, time to heal, adverse events related to the wound.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of a diabetes mellitus
  • Men/women ≥21 years old
  • Post-operative foot or ankle wounds sized < 15cm
  • ABI ≥0.5 or toe pressures >30 mmHg
  • Wounds indicated for treatment with NPWT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active Charcot arthropathy
  • Unable to use NPWT at home
  • Untreated bone or soft tissue infection
  • Is pregnant or plans to become pregnant
  • Is nursing or actively lactating
  • Developmental disability/significant psychological disorder that in the opinion of the investigator could impair the subject's ability to provide informed consent, participate in the study protocol or record study measures, including untreated schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and psychiatric hospitalization within the last 2 years.
  • Active alcohol or substance abuse in the opinion of the investigator that could impair the subject's ability to provide informed consent, participate in the study protocol or record study materials. Active alcohol (> 14 drinks per week over the last 3 months) or substance abuse (current use of cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamines or if drug or alcohol use will interfere with follow-up visits in foot clinic in the opinion of the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Restrata
Treated with Restrata
Restrata® is a novel synthetic nanofabricated scaffold (Restrata Wound Matrix (RWM), Acera Surgical, St. Louis, Missouri) has been developed which is a sterile, single-use device intended for use in the local management of wounds. The RWM is a soft, white, conformable, non-friable, absorbable matrix that acts as a protective covering for wound defects, providing a moist environment for the body's natural healing process to occur (Figure 2). The RWM is made from synthetic biocompatible materials and was designed to include a fibrous structure with high porosity, similar to native ECM. As a viable wrap for surgical procedures, Restrata conforms to injured tissue, can be sutured, and is arthroscopic and robotic procedure friendly.
Active Comparator: NPWT
Treated with NPWT (Negative Pressure Wound Therapy)
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has dramatically changed the care of complex foot wounds. Compared to standard wound care, patients with diabetic foot wounds that are treated with NPWT are 5.9 times more likely to heal and 4.4 times less likely to require amputation. NPWT involves the delivery of sub-atmospheric pressure through a vacuum pump connected to a specialized dressing to maintain a closed environment. NPWT increases perfusion to the wound, accelerates granulation tissue formation, reduces edema, and reduces bio-burden

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound Closure
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the incidence of wound closure. Closure is defined as complete epithelialization with no drainage.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to wound healing
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Days to complete closure. Closure is defined as complete epithelialization with no drainage.
12 weeks
Differences in wound healing trajectories
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Defined as the change in wound area per week. Measured by wound measuring camera and PI observation/physical exam. Reported as mm^2 per day.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lawrence Lavery, DPM MPH, UT Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-0268

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Wound

Clinical Trials on Restrata

Subscribe