Fecal Incontinence Type Assessment Scale

February 17, 2022 updated by: Gérard Amarenco

Fecal Incontinence Type Assessment Scale (FITAS): a New Tool to Distinguish Among Subgroups of Fecal Incontinence

Urge faecal incontinence (FI) and passive FI are the two subgroups of FI described by the International Continence Society. Urge FI is described as "the inability to defer defecation once the urge is perceived for long enough to reach a toilet" and passive FI as "the involuntary leakage of faeces without forewarning". If several validated questionnaires are available for FI, all of these questionnaires were developed to assess FI severity. In literature, there is only a small number of studies that investigated clinical and paraclinical characteristics of the different phenotype of FI. Moreover, there is an heterogenicity in the definitions used for both urge and passive FI among these studies. Lastly, patients with mixed FI were commonly excluded from these studies. It can be established that there is a lack of validate tools to distinguish patients between subgroups of FI.

The aim of the present study was to develop and to validate a new tool in order to investigate and classify patients among the different subgroups of FI (active, passive and mixed) defined by Rome IV criteria.

A monocentric prospective study was conducted in the Neuro-urology Department of a University Hospital. All consecutive patients presenting in the Department with FI between December 2019 and June 2020 were screened for inclusion in the present study. Criteria of inclusion were an age older than 18 years old and symptoms of FI according to Rome IV criteria. Exclusion criteria were anorectal fistula, active inflammatory bowel disease, anorectal malignant tumor not treated, rectal or hemorrhoidal prolapses and specific inability regarding the questionnaire (i.e. cognitive disorders, inability to read and to understand questions).

Phase 1: review of literature and qualitative interviews: To determine the dimensions of the different subgroups of faecal incontinence, a literature review was performed using Pubmed without date limitation until February 2020. The key words used were "active faecal incontinence", "active fecal incontinence", "passive faecal incontinence", "passive fecal incontinence", "urge faecal incontinence", "urge fecal incontinence", "questionnaire", "scale", "score" and "tool". In parallel to this literature review, semi-structured interviews were performed on 20 patients from December 2019 to February 2020. During this phase, a panel expert of 9 neuro-urologists and gastroenterologists was composed. At the term of all interviews, dimensions that were both the most used by patients and the most discriminative among subgroups of FI were included in the questionnaire. Redaction of questions was then performed by the panel expert.

Phase 2: feasibility study: The feasibility study was conducted from February to April 2020 on 30 patients. Each patient was asked to rate each version of the 2 questions with a four-point Likert scale (A: very good, B: good, C: difficult, D: very difficult) regarding acceptance and comprehension of the questions.

Phase 3: validation study: To investigate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire, a validation study was performed from April to June 2020 on 100 consecutive patients. In order to evaluate the FITAS' test reproducibility, patients were asked to answer a second time the questionnaire by mail with a second evaluation from 7 days to 10 days after the first one. The "intra-class correlation coefficient" (ICC) was used to determine if these evaluations could lead to similar results for each question. An ICC > 0.70 was necessary to define reproducibility.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Charlotte Desprez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients consulting in a tertiary center in neuro-urology

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age older than 18 years old
  • symptoms of FI according to Rome IV criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anorectal fistula
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease
  • Anorectal malignant tumor not treated
  • Rectal or hemorrhoidal prolapses
  • Specific inability regarding the questionnaire (i.e. cognitive disorders, inability to read and to understand questions)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients enrolled
an age older than 18 years old and symptoms of FI according to Rome IV criteria.
Semi-qualitative interviews and questionnaire FITAS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reproducibility of FITAS
Time Frame: 1 day
Patients were asked to answer a second time the questionnaire by mail with a second evaluation from 7 days to 10 days after the first one. The "intra-class correlation coefficient" (ICC) was used to determine if these evaluations could lead to similar results for each question. An ICC > 0.70 was necessary to define reproducibility.
1 day
Acceptability of FITAS
Time Frame: 1 day
Each patient was asked to rate acceptability of FITAS with a four-point Likert scale (A: very good, B: good, C: difficult, D: very difficult) regarding acceptance and comprehension of the questions.
1 day
comprehension of FITAS
Time Frame: 1 day
Each patient was asked to rate comprehension of FITAS with a four-point Likert scale (A: very good, B: good, C: difficult, D: very difficult) regarding acceptance and comprehension of the questions.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GREEN GRC01 FITAS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Faecal Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Clinical tests

3
Subscribe