COVID-19 and the Healthy Minds Program for Educators (CAHMP-ED)

August 22, 2024 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the four-week Healthy Minds Program (HMP) app Foundations training in employees of a mid-size urban school district in the United States during the summer of 2020, in the midst of the novel coronavirus pandemic. A 3-month follow-up in the fall of 2020 will also be conducted.

Participants will be recruited via email and mailed postcards, and will first complete an online screen. Eligible participants will then enter a waiting zone for between 2-days and 2-weeks before they are sent the online pre-test. Upon completion of the pre-test, participants will be assigned to condition via a simple random number generator. If assigned to the intervention (i.e., the Healthy Minds Program App), participants will receive instructions and support in downloading and activating the app. Every 7-days over the 4-week intervention period participants in both conditions will complete the same set of measures. A full battery of measures will be administered a second time post-test, following the 4-week intervention period. Three-months after post-test, a follow-up assessment will be conducted.

The investigators predict that participants assigned to the intervention will demonstrate significantly reduced psychological distress after the intervention, and these decreases will persist at the 3-month follow-up. Further, it is hypothesized that baseline participant characteristics and early experience of the intervention will predict treatment adherence, study drop-out and outcomes, and that treatment engagement will moderate outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

698

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 18 years old and up
  • Employees of a K-12 school district in Wisconsin
  • Smartphone or device that can download apps from Google Play or the iTunes app store

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals under 18 years old
  • Significant meditation experience:

    1. Meditation retreat experience (meditation retreat or yoga/body practice retreat with significant meditation component),
    2. Regular meditation practice weekly for over 1 year OR daily practice within the previous 6 months; or
    3. Previous use of the HMP app.
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression score > 70

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training

Healthy Minds Program (HMP) Description:

The HMP app was developed by Healthy Minds Innovations at the UW Center for Healthy Minds, and is based on the work of Richard Davidson, PhD. HMP is designed to promote and protect psychological well-being through sustainable skills training. The program is grounded in constituents of psychological well-being identified in empirical literature. HMP provides core content, with instruction administered through a curriculum of high-quality guided practices. HMP is based on research on eudaimonic well-being (e.g., environmental mastery, purpose) and brain-based skills that underlie these qualities (e.g., regulation of attention, mental flexibility). HMP has >100 guided audio practices that address 4 constituents of well-being: awareness, connection, insight, and purpose.

The HMP is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. The program is unique in several ways. First, all program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). Second, in addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
Other Names:
  • meditation
  • mindfulness
No Intervention: Wait-list control
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Psychological distress will be assessed by aggregating 3 measures: PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression, and the NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale. Averages will be z-scored with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation 1. Higher scores indicate increased psychological distress.
baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscale
Time Frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
A measure of acting with mindful awareness. The total possible range in scores is 8-40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of this facet of mindfulness.
baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)
Time Frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Psychological distancing (i.e., defusion) will be assessed with the 10-item Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS). The total possible range in scores is 0-50, with higher scores indicating greater levels of psychological distancing.
baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
The Meaning in Life Questionnaire Presence subscale will be used to measure perceptions of meaning and purpose in life. The total possible range in scores is 5 - 35 with higher scores indicating greater levels of meaning.
baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
A measure of loneliness (i.e, lack of social connectedness). The total possible range in scores is 1-5, representing the average across all items; higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Time Frame: baseline
The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = "not true of me at all" and 7 = "very true of me" with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.
baseline
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks (post intervention)
The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = "not true of me at all" and 7 = "very true of me" with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.
4 weeks (post intervention)
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Time Frame: 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = "not true of me at all" and 7 = "very true of me" with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.
16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form Score
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
The Self-Compassion Scale Short Form will be used to measure self-compassion. The total possible range in scores is 12-60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-compassion.
baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Change From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Negative ruminative thinking will be measured with the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire. The total possible range in scores is 0-60, with higher scores indicating greater levels negative ruminative thinking.
baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Change From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being Scale
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Well-being will be measured using the WHO-5. The total possible range in scores is 0-25, with higher scores indicating greater levels of well-being.
baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Change From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Being
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention)
A measure of fixed versus incremental mindset regarding well-being. The average across items for a possible range in scores from 1-6 will be measured, with higher scores indicating greater levels of incremental views on well-being (i.e., it can be learned).
baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention)
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
The Neutral Face Rating task is a novel measure of prosocial construal (average likability ratings) and race bias (average liking of white faces minus the average liking of black faces). Total score for prosocial construal is from 1 to 7, with higher scores representing greater prosocial construal.
baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
The Neutral Face Rating task is a novel measure of prosocial construal (average likability ratings) and race bias (average liking of white faces minus the average liking of black faces). Total score for race bias range from -6 to 6, with higher scores representing greater bias favoring white faces (negative scores on the bias measure indicate bias for liking black faces more than white faces).
baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Slope Across Time on Practice Quality and Mood Items
Time Frame: Every other day when participant completes a practice (up to 4 weeks)
4-tems following each app-based practice for treatment participants that ask about perceive quality of the practice, (1 poor, 9 very good), and mood (1 poor, 5 good).
Every other day when participant completes a practice (up to 4 weeks)
Digital Working Alliance
Time Frame: After weeks 1, 2, and 3 during the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention) - Intervention group only
A measure of working alliance in a digital environment that will be averaged across all items for a score range from 1 to 7, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of alliance.
After weeks 1, 2, and 3 during the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention) - Intervention group only

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 12, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 12, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-0533
  • A171600 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • EDUC/COUNSELING PSYCH (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • Protocol Approval 10/15/2020 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be de-identified and listed in public data registries (i.e., osf) based on the publication of preregistered study hypotheses on a manuscript by manuscript basis.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be de-identified and made publicly available based on the publication of preregistered study hypotheses following peer review.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researcher consent. Any reasonable request will be granted.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training

Subscribe