Behavior, Biology and Well-Being Study (BeWell)

July 14, 2025 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Comparing the Healthy Minds Program With an Active Control and Waitlist Control in Depression: Pilot Study

The central aim of this pilot study is to compare markers of inflammation and gut microbial diversity with users of the Healthy Minds Program (HMP) app, an intervention designed to promote well-being. The investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 300 participants comparing 4-weeks of the HMP app with an active control (Psychoeducation [HMP without meditation practice]), and a waitlist control in a sample of United States adults with elevated depression symptoms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Depression is highly prevalent and associated with extreme personal and societal costs. Meditation training reduces depression symptoms and psychological distress, but access to in-person programs is limited due to associated cost and lack of available services. Research on neurocognitive and biological mechanisms of mediation training in alleviating depression is at a preliminary stage, and an obstacle limiting research progress is over-reliance on retrospective self-report measures, which are vulnerable to a host of biases. This project will use gold-standard behavioral measures and explore novel measures of relevant neurocognitive and behavioral processes, namely pattern separation, self-referential thought, and video-based assessment of emotional well-being. Furthermore, the project will investigate effects on the gut microbiome (with fecal samples) and inflammation (with dried blood spots), which reflect biological systems hypothesized to be mechanistically related to benefits of meditation and well-being training.

Specific Aims:

  • Aim 1. Determine the feasibility and acceptability of assessing inflammatory activity and gut microbiome within the context of a fully remote randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants with elevated depression symptoms from an RCT (n = 1,100; registered to NCT05183867) comparing the Healthy Minds Program (HMP) app with an active control (HMP with didactic content only) and wait-list will be invited to provide dried blood spots (DBS) for inflammatory protein analysis and fecal samples for gut microbial analysis at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Hypotheses: It will be feasible to recruit 300 participants to provide DBS and fecal samples and 80% will provide samples at both time points (completer n = 240) with no differences in completion rates between non-Hispanic White and racial/ethnic minority participants.
  • Aim 2. Characterize the association between self-reports of well-being, inflammatory activity at baseline, and microbiota diversity at baseline. Hypotheses: Well-being will correlate inversely with both protein biomarkers of inflammation (CRP, IL-6) and mRNA-derived indicators of pro-inflammatory transcriptional activity. Well-being will correlate positively with alpha diversity of the gut microbiome. These associations will not be moderated by participant race/ethnicity.
  • Aim 3. Evaluate intervention effects on inflammatory activity and microbiota diversity. Hypotheses: Participants randomized to HMP or the active control will show larger reductions in inflammation vs. wait-list at 3-month follow-up and larger increases in alpha diversity of the gut microbiome vs. wait-list at 3-month follow-up. HMP will show larger reductions in inflammation vs. active control at 3-month follow-up and larger increases in alpha diversity vs. active control at 3-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53703
        • University of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elevated PHQ-8 or PHQ-9 ≥ 5 at screening and pre-baseline interview
  • Proficient in English
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Have access to a smartphone that can download apps from Google Play or the Apple App Store
  • For payment purposes, must be a US citizen or a permanent US resident

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Regular daily meditation practice for past 6 months or regular weekly meditation practice for past 12 months
  • Attended a meditation retreat or a yoga/body practice retreat with a significant meditation component

    - Previous use of Healthy Minds Program app

  • Current suicidal intent and/or high self-injury risk (determined from the interview)
  • Self-reported history of psychosis
  • Self-reported history of mania
  • Current psychopathology that interferes with study participation as assessed by interview
  • Living or traveling outside the US during the whole study participation period (trips outside US after the interview phase is not an exclusion)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score ≥ 13 for women and AUDIT score ≥ 15 for men
  • Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) score ≥ 8 for women and men

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Healthy Minds Program (HMP) app
Participants will receive access to the 4-week HMP Foundations module. The HMP app is a meditation-based smartphone app designed to promote and protect psychological well-being through sustainable skills training. The program is grounded in constituents of psychological well-being identified in empirical literature. HMP provides core content, with instruction administered through a curriculum of guided practices. HMP is based on research on eudaimonic well-being (e.g., environmental mastery, purpose) and brain-based skills that underlie these qualities (e.g., regulation of attention, mental flexibility). The full HMP has guided audio practices that address 4 constituents of well-being: awareness, connection, insight, and purpose. At post-treatment, participants will be given access to additional HMP content to support their continued practice.
HMP is a 4-week mobile health (mHealth) meditation training program.
Other Names:
  • HMP
Active Comparator: Psychoeducation app
Participants will receive access to the 4-week HMP Foundations module with guided meditation practices removed. The active control will include only the didactic content included in HMP without the guided meditation practices.
Psychoeducation app
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants will receive access to HMP at the end of the study and will be encouraged to continue with their usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of DBS Collection as Measured by Number of Participants Who Provide DBS
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Feasibility is defined as 80% of participants providing samples at both time points (completer n = 240) with no differences in completion rates between non-Hispanic White and racial/ethnic minority participants.
Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Feasibility of Fecal Sample Collection as Measured by Number of Participants Who Provide Fecal Samples
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Feasibility is defined as 80% of participants providing samples at both time points (completer n = 240) with no differences in completion rates between non-Hispanic White and racial/ethnic minority participants.
Baseline and 3 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depression Symptoms Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 (of intervention period), and 3 month follow-up
The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire where participants report how often in the past 2 weeks they were bothered by specific problems. It is scored on a 4-point Likert scale where 0 = not at all to 3 = nearly every day. The total possible range of scores is 0-24 where higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 (of intervention period), and 3 month follow-up
Change in Flourishing Measured by the Flourishing Index Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 (of intervention period), and 3 month follow-up
The Flourishing Index is a 10-item questionnaire where participants report their general level of flourishing (e.g., well-being, health, etc.). It is scored on a 0 to 10-point scale, with anchors varying across items. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher flourishing.
Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 (of intervention period), and 3 month follow-up
Change in Microbiome Alpha Diversity: Species Richness
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Genetic analyses of the microbiome of the fecal sample (microorganism DNA, not that of the person) will be performed. Reported here are the observed (total number of distinct taxa) and calculated (Chao1 = N + S2 / (2 D), where N is the number of observed OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units), S is the number of singleton OTUs, and D is the number of doublet OTUs) number of species represented in the sample. Chao1 is a species richness calculator that accounts for rare species.
Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Change in Microbiome Alpha Diversity: Shannon Diversity Index (H')
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Genetic analyses of the microbiome of the fecal sample (microorganism DNA, not that of the person) will be performed. Shannon Diversity Index quantifies both the richness and the evenness of a community. It takes into account the number of taxa (richness) and their relative abundances (evenness). A higher Shannon index value indicates greater diversity, with both a high number of taxa and more even distribution of abundances among them. It is often used to assess the balance between species in a community. Typically ranges from 0-5 with higher numbers indicating increasing species diversity.
Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Change in Microbiome Alpha Diversity: Inverse Simpson (1/D)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Genetic analyses of the microbiome of the fecal sample (microorganism DNA, not that of the person) will be performed. Simpson is the probability that any two microbes are the same species, ranging from 0-1. Inverse Simpson (1 / Simpson) considers both richness and evenness. It places greater weight on the more abundant taxa. A higher inverse Simpson index suggests a more even distribution of taxa, with fewer dominant species. The inverse Simpson index is sensitive to the presence of dominant species and may emphasize diversity loss when one or a few species dominate the community.
Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Change in Microbiome Alpha Diversity: Pielou Evenness Index (J)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Genetic analyses of the microbiome of the fecal sample (microorganism DNA, not that of the person) will be performed. Pielou Evenness Index measures how evenly the individuals are distributed across the taxa in a sample. It is calculated by dividing the Shannon diversity index by the maximum possible value of the Shannon index (which occurs when all taxa are equally abundant). The Pielou index ranges from 0 (no evenness, where one species dominates) to 1 (perfect evenness, where all species are equally abundant).
Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Change in Microbiome Alpha Diversity: Simpson's Dominance Index (D)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Genetic analyses of the microbiome of the fecal sample (microorganism DNA, not that of the person) will be performed. Simpson's Dominance Index measures the probability that two randomly selected individuals from a community belong to the same species (or taxon). It ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates perfect diversity (no dominance of a single species) and values closer to 1 indicate that one or a few species dominate the community. A lower Simpson's dominance score suggests a more diverse community, while a higher score indicates a community dominated by a few taxa.
Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Change in Inflammatory Biomarkers: C-reactive Protein
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Dried blood spot samples will be used to measure inflammatory cytokines (C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)). Additionally mRNA assays will be used to detect and quantify inflammatory gene expression detect and monitor cellular immune responses. Analyses will focus on transcripts from ~200 genes known to be involved in the regulation of inflammation, and will consider key transcripts (e.g., IL-1beta, TNF-alpha) as well as summary measures reflecting the activity of transcriptional networks that coordinate inflammation (NF-kB, AP-1).
Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Change in Inflammatory Biomarkers: TNF-Alpha, IL-6, IL-10
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month follow-up
Dried blood spot samples will be used to measure inflammatory cytokines (C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)). Additionally mRNA assays will be used to detect and quantify inflammatory gene expression detect and monitor cellular immune responses. Analyses will focus on transcripts from ~200 genes known to be involved in the regulation of inflammation, and will consider key transcripts (e.g., IL-1beta, TNF-alpha) as well as summary measures reflecting the activity of transcriptional networks that coordinate inflammation (NF-kB, AP-1).
Baseline and 3 month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With PHQ-8 Scores That Increased by 5 Points or More Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 (of intervention period), and 3 month follow-up
The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire where participants report how often in the past 2 weeks they were bothered by specific problems. Increase in scores indicates increase is depression symptoms.
Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 (of intervention period), and 3 month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simon Goldberg, PhD, UW-Madison, Center for Healthy Minds

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-0991: Pilot
  • A487400 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • 1U24AT011289-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • Protocol Version 6/29/2023 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Healthy Minds Program

Subscribe